Originally posted by Adam_PoE
What I think is that you need to read the previous page again to see what was actually stated.Case in point, the fact that he "related this to his own experience" was never in question. I acknowledged that this was the case when I asked:
To which he replied:
Had he not been making a generalization about Buddhists based on his experiences with Buddhists, he whould have responded, "I am not making a generalization about Buddhists."
Furthermore, since I acknowledged that his argument is based on his experiences, and he conceded that his argument is based on his experiences, where is the misrepresentation?
By all means, illustrate how "truth" is subjective in Buddhism.
This is getting rather ridiculous. It's obvious that you purposely misquoted and misinterpreted what was said. He did not make a generalization, seeing as how he only referred to his own experience, not the experiences of others. This is getting a bit off topic and grossly repetitive, so I'll let this be my final post on this issue.