Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
Thor is the more durable.Hulk's healing factor isn't part of durability. It makes him last a long time, through a lot of damage, sure, but its not durability.
Healing Factor means he's already taken the damage, and now he's recovering.
Durability means you dont have to recover from the damage...
read thor #385 and than we'll talk again
Originally posted by bigbran
Not the best comic to help support your case...
They stalemated in h2h for a while, until, we all know Hulk can get stronger...
Nothing to do with duribility really. Plus he didn't put Thor down either.
referring to the last image of that issue: do you remember Thor's face ? and Hulk was fresh as a flower
Originally posted by FearOfBlood
referring to the last image of that issue: do you remember Thor's face ? and Hulk was fresh as a flower
Edit: Hulk has a healing factor ,Thor doesn't.
Originally posted by FearOfBloodYou mean in COMICS?
only in fanfiction or you have no idea what the word "KO" meansBTW Marvel Handbook :
- Hulk 7/7 ------Thor 6/7------Hulk>Thor
Plus, what the hell is this ratings about? You know a 7 equals 100 tons right? You know Thor has lifted the weight of the world right?
So in the same post, you proved you were wrong.
Also, in a Marvel event, they had a thing where Thor was above Hulk in base strength, does that also mean that Hulk is a 6 as base strength?
For those of you who think that Thor can survive inside the core of the sun, you're nuts!
Standing in the core of the sun, with the heat and pressure at unimaginable levels, would be akin to standing while a million nuclear bombs are exploding around you.
Thor is durable, but he is not THAT durable. If he could take a million nukes at once without a scratch, then he would almost never even get hurt fighting the enemies he does.
Originally posted by masterbruceHow can we think, when he has?
For those of you who think that Thor can survive inside the core of the sun, you're nuts!Standing in the core of the sun, with the heat and pressure at unimaginable levels, would be akin to standing while a million nuclear bombs are exploding around you.
Thor is durable, but he is not THAT durable. If he could take a million nukes at once without a scratch, then he would almost never even get hurt fighting the enemies he does.
Originally posted by Tassadar
Not counting blocking/absorbing energy attacks and such, Hulk has more durability. Thor usually lasts longer and has a few more impressive feats because he takes his opponents attacks and redirects it or absorbs it with mjolnir, Hulk just stands there and takes it.
co-signed
Well have to agree on one thing, you can´t be 100% sure iff hulk is really more durable, because he got one of the best healing factors in marvel.
So he could heal from minor wounds in almost a second.
While thor has to take it, without healing.
Not counting blocking/absorbing energy attacks and such, Hulk has more durability. Thor usually lasts longer and has a few more impressive feats because he takes his opponents attacks and redirects it or absorbs it with mjolnir, Hulk just stands there and takes it.
Well his healing factor also give him a edge in the taking damage.
He could heal up just like wolverine does in some of his fights, just take the damage he knows he will heal.
Thor won´t or alteast not at the same rate.
I'd say Hulk is definitely more durable.
Wolverine cuts King Thor, he merely scratches Hulk.
The highend is debateable, but for a Hulk fan, the Thor taking shots fromt the Celestial Host might be the definition of pis, while for Thorbags, the Hulk taking antimatter and universe destroying blasts is pis.
You can't pick and choose whats legit.
You can laugh at all feats, but accept them as well.
I'd say Hulk is consistently more durable than Thor.
The taking out by a bullet thing really hurts Thors average, as does the maiming by Wolverine.
Originally posted by UniOmni
I'd say Hulk is definitely more durable.Wolverine cuts King Thor, he merely scratches Hulk.
The highend is debateable, but for a Hulk fan, the Thor taking shots fromt the Celestial Host might be the definition of pis, while for Thorbags, the Hulk taking antimatter and universe destroying blasts is pis.
You can't pick and choose whats legit.
You can laugh at all feats, but accept them as well.
I'd say Hulk is consistently more durable than Thor.
The taking out by a bullet thing really hurts Thors average, as does the maiming by Wolverine.
Taken out by a bullet? When? Thor's taken barrages of assault weapons. He's taken artillery rounds to the face. He's taken nukes. He's taken planet destroying blasts.
A bullet taking him out? Yeah, right. And Captain America could one-shot the Hulk.
Anyways, fact of the matter is, Thor is more DURABLE than the Hulk, but the Hulk would last much longer due to his healing factor. I mean, when hit with the same attack, the Hulk takes more actual DAMAGE, but it heals over. Thor takes LESS damage, but it stays with him.