Omega Flight

Started by grey fox25 pages
Originally posted by Juntai
Like The Spirit being 87 and the Zombie/AoD one being 29.
Examples are all over that.

29 !

That's a frikken insult !!!

Originally posted by King_Mungi
#3 came out today, and ooooooh baby Tanaraq is a pimp.

Seems Surtur's demon army was in fact Tanaraq's

Just read it, awesome issue. The fight between the wrecker and BRB was awesome.

Originally posted by Big Sexy
Just read it, awesome issue. The fight between the wrecker and BRB was awesome.

Scans ?

It was not "awesome", it was actually a little disappointing ... it took ages to build up to something happening and as soon as something did happen the comic ended.

😐

Originally posted by Scoobless
It was not "awesome", it was actually a little disappointing ... it took ages to build up to something happening and as soon as something did happen the comic ended.

😐

Co-signed.

I'm glad Avengers: The Inititave got the nod for an ongoing series and this was made a mini, Slott's doing a much better job on the former IMO.

Originally posted by grey fox
Scans ?

I posted it in the Great Beasts section and soon in the Wrecking Crew section

Originally posted by Scoobless
It was not "awesome", it was actually a little disappointing ... it took ages to build up to something happening and as soon as something did happen the comic ended.

😐

Considering how they have treated Alpha Flight characters in the past, the way Mike is dealing with Tanaraq is AWESOME.

Originally posted by grey fox
Scans ?
probably have to ask Mungi. I can't translate C-display.

Originally posted by CasanoVa
Co-signed.

I'm glad Avengers: The Inititave got the nod for an ongoing series and this was made a mini, Slott's doing a much better job on the former IMO.

Mike has gone onto record saying the way OF has been written was on the basis of it being an on-going. Marvel screwed him over, not leaving him much time to change his story.

Maybe its just me. I liked the issue. You know a "Good vs Evil issue" funny how that seems almost rare now a days.

The reviews have been favorable

http://www.silverbulletcomicbooks.com/reviews/118106174380385.htm

Originally posted by Big Sexy
Maybe its just me. I liked the issue. You know a "Good vs Evil issue" funny how that seems almost rare now a days.

"Good Vs Evil" is a pretty naive, outdated, concept ... no one is all good or all evil and comics should reflect that.

Originally posted by Scoobless
"Good Vs Evil" is a pretty naive, outdated, concept ... no one is all good or all evil and comics should reflect that.
🙄 I am tired of Hero vs Hero and you know what I mean by "Good vs Evil". Lets not get into semantics on it.

Originally posted by Scoobless
"Good Vs Evil" is a pretty naive, outdated, concept ... no one is all good or all evil and comics should reflect that.

But comics should present the world not as it is, but as it could/should be...

Originally posted by shksprtx
But comics should present the world not as it is, but as it could/should be...

So you think there should be people who are pure evil fighting people who would never do a single thing to harm another person in any way?

How would you relate to those characters? it's completely unrealistic ... even by comic/sci-fi standards.

Originally posted by Scoobless
So you think there should be people who are pure evil fighting people who would never do a single thing to harm another person in any way?

How would you relate to those characters? it's completely unrealistic ... even by comic/sci-fi standards.

I wouldn't say the concept is outdated

There are definitely people out there who really are just plain out evil, selfish beings.

Not every goddamn villan has some sympathetic backstory or something like that. Sometimes, bad guys are just bad

Originally posted by Scoobless
So you think there should be people who are pure evil fighting people who would never do a single thing to harm another person in any way?

How would you relate to those characters? it's completely unrealistic ... even by comic/sci-fi standards.

In the sense of using comics as a moral allegory (that good triumphs over evil, that truth/virtue/etc. are laudable ideals, and so on) then yes, I do.

I think we get the message better and are engaged more when we have a clear idea of who's on which side.

The same applies with movies...name a movie with an ambiguous good guy/bad guy relationship, and it'll probably be the exception to the rule.

By the way, this concept goes back to Aristotle and before...

Originally posted by Grimm22
Not every goddamn villan has some sympathetic backstory or something like that. Sometimes, bad guys are just bad

True...even so, we generally have to have some reason to at least identify with them, otherwise the moral of the story gets diluted.

Instead of being able to see that same evil within us, when faced with an unsympathetic antagonist we generally find ourselves saying that there's no WAY we could harbor that kind of evil within ourselves...

It's a precarious balance.

I know this post and the one directly above seem contradictory, but I can guarantee you that the two ideas are in fact compatible...

This issue was alright, but yeah, it only felt like half an issue.

Originally posted by Lucid Lui
This issue was alright, but yeah, it only felt like half an issue.

I agree...I wanted more of an ending than what I got...I've re-read it several times since this morning and am still not sure why Oeming would have ended the issue so abruptly...

I really liked the latest issue...

BRB especially caught my interest.