Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too. None of your arguments are logical. "Hey look at me I decide what's canon and what isn't". Dumbass
Oh my fricking days, you are such a moron? For an argument to be logical, it has to be devoid of logical fallacies, so 'You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too' makes zero sense. You're a retard, and I'm done with arguing with you. ACStyles proved how much of a loser you are, and you've been constantly proving him right ever since.
Originally posted by allfg
Oh my fricking days, you are such a moron? For an argument to be logical, it has to be devoid of logical fallacies, so 'You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too' makes zero sense. You're a retard, and I'm done with arguing with you. ACStyles proved how much of a loser you are, and you've been constantly proving him right ever since.
I guess you really do bring out the moron in yourself. I suppose I need to clear it up for you since you are too stupid to even attempt to use common sense. Here are 3 types of arguments
1. Logical arguments
2. Illogical arguments
3. NO arguments(which is what you are doing)
I realize you live in a black and white world, but the rest of us don't. You do understand that something that doesn't even constitute as an argument, doesn't really have to be devoid of logic right? Or is that too much above you? And if by "ACS proved this this and that" you mean I pwned argument to hell and back, then you're correct. I wouldn't be calling anyone a loser, considering you're the biggest loser to ever grace this forum, and you embarass yourself every single time you post.
1. I did post an argument, you moron.
2. Your exact words were. 'You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too.' Not, 'You don't have an argument to point out the fallacies too,' but, 'You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too.' In other words, you contradict yourself every other post, moron.
3. AC made you look silly, and the funniest thing is how before that, all you did was cheer lead his posts like a b1tch.
4. ((The_Anomaly)), you're a troll, it's annoying, be quiet, you weird old man.
LOL, nice! how aggresive did you go?
My partner and I totally dominated the debate, but seeing how our opposition managed to do some Pathos persuasion on the audience (they vote for the best debating team) (the topic was on U.S. immigration policies), I totally went into the Final Negative and took every single point and destroyed them, basically making the Affirmative look like dumbasses. LOL, it was nice...
LOL, jk, but seriously, what kind of stuff did you say?
First of all, these views on immigration ARE NOT MY OWN!!! I was chosen to debate for the Negative position on U.S. immigration policies, or basically making them stay the same.
And Nebaris. We pointed out evidence showing the percentages of environment degradation 1 average immigration does to the U.S, and one of my opponents said "everybody pollutes the U.S, so it's not just the immigrants fault."
Then I'm like, "wow, congratulations for giving us THE most obvious statement in the world. No duh, all individuals pollute the world!!! But we have specifically said the rate for 1 AVERAGE IMMIGRANT coming to the U.S"
Then we were like explaining the connection of the citizens's view on immigration and how what the people want on this is what they should get (following the principles of how immigrations affect jobs and Popular sovereignty). They replied saying we were using a logical fallacy: Appeal to Popular Opinion and totally killed that argument saying "like in the Salem Witch Trials, the ppl were wrong."
I simply replied, "Hey kid, what the hell does the Salem Witch Trials have to do with Immigration?'
There was more to that speech, but there was some ridiculous stuff I just totally had to demolish out there.
Originally posted by allfg
1. I did post an argument, you moron.
2. Your exact words were. 'You don't have a [b]logical argument to point out the fallacies too.' Not, 'You don't have an argument to point out the fallacies too,' but, 'You don't have a logical argument to point out the fallacies too.' In other words, you contradict yourself every other post, moron.
3. AC made you look silly, and the funniest thing is how before that, all you did was cheer lead his posts like a b1tch.
4. ((The_Anomaly)), you're a troll, it's annoying, be quiet, you weird old man. [/B]
1. No, you didn't. You can consider it an argument but nobody else does, fool.
2. What's going on, you've been embarassed so your natural defense mechanism is to point out my errors? That's cute. So let me rephrase, so that you have NOTHING to ***** about. You have NO argument for me to begin calling it logical or illogical, happy? You're an idiot.
3. I guess you missed the pwnage, figures. Poor kid.