Originally posted by Seraphim XIIIIt's not the same thing. Duplicate threads are not allowed. It is obviously allowed for there to be more than one knight. And different knights are still different people. These threads are fundamentally the same
That's not what you said.You said if something needs to be defended of it's originality, it's simply not original. That is logical fallacy. Just like if a Knight had to defend his knighthood, he would not be a knight. Do you see the essential flaws in your twisted and broken logic? Or no?
Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
You never said it war srugbut you're trying to avoid the fact you made a mistake.
You're not perfect.
I'm trying to avoid a mistake? You just thought I posted the definition for Distortion, thus making a mistake.
Irony.
Here, one more time now:
DISTORTION
"To twist awry or out of shape; make crooked or deformed: Arthritis had distorted his fingers."
CHANGE
"to make the form, nature, content, future course, etc., of (something) different from what it is or from what it would be if left alone."
Originally posted by Strangelove
It's not the same thing. Duplicate threads are not allowed. It is obviously allowed for there to be more than one knight.
Irrelevant semantics to save yourself. How dissapointing. This is not a duplicate thread and your logic was faulty. Don't make me explain it again. I've done it several times.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I'm trying to avoid a mistake? You just thought I posted the definition for Distortion, thus making a mistake.Irony.
Here, one more time now:
[B]DISTORTION
"To twist awry or out of shape; make crooked or deformed: Arthritis had distorted his fingers."
CHANGE
"to make the form, nature, content, future course, etc., of (something) different from what it is or from what it would be if left alone." [/B]
When you Distort a picture, you have changed its original form.
You're an idiot who can't see through his own ignorance.
You're more ignorant then any other member on this forum, you've even passed Diddy Level.
Just Shut up and give it a rest, for Christs sake.
Saying the same point over and over and over again doesn't change the fact its a duplicate thread.
Originally posted by Strangelove
And you're still wrong.Don't get too broken up about it petpet
We're going to go through this one more time. You think because you state somebody is wrong, it just magically makes them incorrect? F*ck, if life worked like that, I'd have it made.
Originally posted by Strangelove
If you have to spend energy defending the originality of your thread, it's not original
If a knight has to spend energy defending his knighthood, he is not a knight.
If I have to spend energy defending myself in a fight, it's not a fight.
Your logic is simply at fault. If someone enters my thread and dictates that my thread is not original, and I defend it ...
This does not break originality. Sorry, pal.
Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
When you Distort a picture, you have changed its original form.You're an idiot who can't see through his own ignorance.
You're more ignorant then any other member on this forum, you've even passed Diddy Level.
Just Shut up and give it a rest, for Christs sake.
Saying the same point over and over and over again doesn't change the fact its a duplicate thread.
That's logically incorrect. Stop being foolish. Distortion is different. It does not undergo change because it's not a drastic enough performance to do so. This is why it twists or alters something. There is no effective complete CHANGE in the said entity or material.
Don't be a damned hypocrite. GTFO if you're going to be one, basically.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
That's logically incorrect. Stop being foolish. Distortion is different. It does not undergo change because it's not a drastic enough performance to do so. This is why it twists or alters something. There is no effective complete CHANGE in the said entity or material.Don't be a damned hypocrite. GTFO if you're going to be one, basically.
Listen to yourself you idiot, FFS.
But it doesn't matter, you don't care about other people's opinions. When you're mind's set, its all the matters to you.
Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
Listen to yourself you idiot, FFS.But it doesn't matter, you don't care about other people's opinions. When you're mind's set, its all the matters to you.
I value your opinion, you're just being stubborn when you're in the wrong. If distortion and change are the same, why are they labeled as unparalleled? Why are they separate definitions? Why does each one not mention the other through organized explanation?
Just. F*cking. Stop.
The two are different. It's that simple! GOI, FFS!!!! GOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I value your opinion, you're just being stubborn when you're in the wrong. If distortion and change are the same, why are they labeled as unparalleled? Why are they separate definitions? Why does each one not mention the other through organized explanation?Just. F*cking. Stop.
The two are different. It's that simple! GOI, FFS!!!! GOI!!!!!!!!!!!!!
🙄
I know how to settle this.
Wait to see if it's merged.
Originally posted by Vinny Valentine
🙄I know how to settle this.
Wait to see if it's merged.
So, your point gets proven because a thread on a forum is merged? God, I'm f*cking tired of your ignorant shit, Vinny. Go pick up a dictionary BOOK and read Change, then go to Distortion.
Notice. How. They. Are. Two. Different. Things?
Originally posted by Seraphim XIIII didn't just 'state' that you were wrong. I proved it. And you're looking past the whole point to argue semantics about the definition of the word distort. Well here it is.
We're going to go through this one more time. You think because you state somebody is wrong, it just magically makes them incorrect? F*ck, if life worked like that, I'd have it made.
To distort something, you must change it. If you're not changing it, then there is no distortion. Change is the fundamental assumption when you are talking about distortion.
To use the law of syllogism:
(Reminder: Law of Syllogism
Major premise- A=B
Minor premise- B=C
Conclusion- A=C)
Distort: to alter
Alter: to change
therefore,
Distort: to change
Originally posted by Strangelove
I didn't just 'state' that you were wrong. I proved it. And you're looking past the whole point to argue semantics about the definition of the word distort. Well here it is.To distort something, you must [b]change
it. If you're not changing it, then there is no distortion. Change is the fundamental assumption when you are talking about distortion.To use the law of syllogism:
(Reminder: Law of Syllogism
Major premise- A=B
Minor premise: B=C
Conclusion- A=C)Distort: to alter
Alter: to change
therefore,
Distort: to change [/B]
Oh my god, this is ridiculous. Naturally, the two entertwine, but listen carefully here.
Each has their own definition, differential function and are essentially considered DIFFERENT. That's the basic logical principal.
Fine, let's do this by your logic then.
A Human and a Rabbit are parallel things. They are both the same. Why? BOTH ARE ANIMALS.
Forks and Spoons are the EXACT same thing. Why? THEY'RE BOTH STAINLESS STEEL.
See where you logic loses it's function? You're digging too deep into the rabbit hole. You cannot consider distortion and change the same thing.
Why?
THEY SIMPLY ARE NOT THE SAME.
The Earth and Mars are the same thing. They are EXACTLY THE SAME. Why? They're both planets.
I hope you get the point. Your fundamentals are off course by miles, son. Learn to use syllogism to your advantage.
Likewise, if speaking logically correct, distortion or change should not exist if both are parallel.
They are FUNDAMENTALLY the same, but are not parallel enough to be considered exactly the same thing. Ergo, the thread should not be merged because of major indifference.
You lose.
Originally posted by Seraphim XIIIThe examples you name do not follow the Law of syllogism. So therefore, you completely ignored my point. Good job.
Oh my god, this is ridiculous. Naturally, the two entertwine, but listen carefully here.Each has their own definition, differential function and are essentially considered DIFFERENT. That's the basic logical principal.
Fine, let's do this by your logic then.
A Human and a Rabbit are parallel things. They are both the same. Why? [B]BOTH ARE ANIMALS
.Forks and Spoons are the EXACT same thing. Why? THEY'RE BOTH STAINLESS STEEL.
See where you logic loses it's function? You're digging too deep into the rabbit hole. You cannot consider distortion and change the same thing.
Why?
THEY SIMPLY ARE NOT THE SAME.
The Earth and Mars are the same thing. They are EXACTLY THE SAME. Why? They're both planets.
I hope you get the point. Your fundamentals are off course by miles, son. Learn to use syllogism to your advantage.
Likewise, if speaking logically correct, distortion or change should not exist if both are parallel.
They are FUNDAMENTALLY the same, but are not parallel enough to be considered exactly the same thing. Ergo, the thread should not be merged because of major indifference.
You lose. [/B]
Here's what you tried to do.
Human=animal
Rabbit=animal
Human=rabbit
wrong
Fork=stainless steel
Spoon=stainless steel
Fork=Spoon
wrong
Earth=planet
Mars=planet
Earth=Mars
wrong
You would fail logic miserably
Originally posted by Strangelove
The examples you name do not follow the Law of syllogism. So therefore, you completely ignored my point. Good job.Here's what you tried to do.
Human=animal
Rabbit=animal
Human=rabbit[b]wrong
Fork=stainless steel
Spoon=stainless steel
Fork=Spoonwrong
Earth=planet
Mars=planet
Earth=Marswrong
You would fail logic miserably [/B]
Halftruth, Logical Fallacy.
You're indecisively trying to dismiss something as an absolute truth when you're wrong.
Here's the run down.
I'll use your logic. Earth and Mars are fundamentally the same thing. Why? They're both planets.
^ That is what you're trying to dismiss.
Distort utilizes a form of change, so it is change itself.
^ What you're saying.
A Simile utilizes a form of a metaphor, so it is a metaphor itself.
^ Incorrect. They're separate things. They have separate definitions and usages, making them unparalleled.
Distortion is essentially a change, but is not primarily indifferent. Therefore, Distortion serves as a different function.
How would I fail logic miserably? You're dismissing Distortion as change.
Hell, remember this?
Distortion = Change.
^ WRONG!
If distortion is changed, why do they exist as two separate functions? I'm waiting.