OH for ****s sake.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
And you are still as misguided as ever, you still leave your posts open to misinterpretation quite often. It is practice in an argument to be direct and precise and your direction is often misdirected.
And your still full of it as ever.. NOT ONCE in my post that started this mess did I inquire as to the direction of the bears. It obvious wherever the bears are they'll be "directed" at Logan.. What I asked was why it's assumed he'll be surrounded.
And NOT ONCE did I say anything that had ANYTHING to do with stealth missions, so again I ask you why the hell you would even bring that up?
And to top it all off you're now blaming ME for your Short sidedness? HAHAHAHAHA! That's a hoot.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
You seemed to have a problem with him being in close quarters to them and even then would it really matter? Logic dictates that he would be surrounded quite quickly or facing a solid surface with nowhere to move, it makes it harder for him in some aspects. 😬
Actually there were several ¡§points¡¨ I could have responded to, and I did. Just because you don¡¦t like when someone goes down on your posts doesn¡¦t mean they won¡¦t.
What¡¦s so hard about it is that people in this forum seem to have a hard time comprehending things so I am saying, which is why I am constantly forced to rehash and rehash it because:
A: They have issues with basic reading skills and points of connection. Or¡K
B: They intentionally misinterpret things to be frustrating. Or¡K
C: They misinterpret it for their own benefit.
I think with you it's usually a mixture of the three, particularly C. .
I don't have a problem with Logan in close quarters, That's how he needs to fight this, but I do have a problem with him being assumed to be surrounded when the fight kicks off. He won¡¦t be, and it does matter.
And no, I didn't have a tough time comprehending what you said, I have a tough time connecting it to anything I said, and then I gave you ample opportunity to change that¡K You failed. But it's nice to see you blame me for your problems yet again.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
No I¡¦m quite right actually, it¡¦s just that you don¡¦t want to see that. And never will.
No youre not.. maybe in C-world.. not the real one.. the only people the hand "job" to, beat the hand for a reason. You just don't want to see that, and you never will.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterDo YOU understand that PIS is entirely subjective?
Do you understand what plot devices or PIS are? Why do you even bother using something as evidence, and then when I explain why it¡¦s bad evidence, use evidence contradicting it which only hurts your own damned argument? Do you like owning yourself? This is what I mean below¡K
Because you do a piss poor job of explaining WHY it's bad evidence.. "its crap because its crap".
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
So applying this to your logic that Sabretooth is a more vicious Wolverine, why the hell can¡¦t they beat Wolverine? Either your evidence is very circumstancial, and/or it¡¦s because it¡¦s all PIS in the first place and you just want to keep the bad evidence in the field.
Because wolverine obviously has circumstances going for him that Sabretooth didn't.
A better healing factor (by leagues), an adamantium skeleton that protects his vitals and allows his healing factor to have to work less due to no necessity for mending bones, being a smaller target that's more easily lost among the fray, using more skill, speed, and agility to his advantage, and the fact that he's already well versed in their style of combat (which captain America admitted took some time getting used to).
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterAnd you still fail to see that they don't "job to give EVERYONE a chance". They lose to a select group; everyone outside of that select group who isn't invulnerable or top tier in power levels hasn't faced the hand with much success.
You fail to see many things, in great numbers characters perform less well and tend to job to give everyone a chance. Hand ninjas like bullets are there to make the character look good and not much more. Why the hell can¡¦t thousands of armed man do anything to a street leveler? It doesn¡¦t make sense and is a poor example to use, period.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
You¡¦re still bad at logic and connecting points S with P, so I¡¦ll have to help you again so you can misinterpret it¡K. Again.
I¡¦m bad at logic because I don't agree with you? Yes.. excellent."logic".. 🙄
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
But not all foot, and they both still job. Some of S is P.
Not all foot? Are you referring to the elite? Because earlier you WERE talking about foot soldiers in which case. YES hand still>>> foot.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
But not while they are jobbing. None of S is P.
Assuming they were jobbing, yes even then.. hand>>>sentinel. Sentinel>>bears.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Well at least you admit they are jobbers now, which unfortunately throws your argument out of the water since we arguing by KMC rules, something that you always seem to forget.
Since none of S is P in one example and some of it is in another, it makes the statements contradictory and therefore out of place. You can¡¦t say that something is absolutely not something and then say that some of it is later on. Keep up. .
I didn¡¦t say they WERE in fact jobbers.. I said "IF THEY WERE", which implies that as it stands they are not. (you can't even grasp that concept but I need to keep up?) Pffft.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterI guess if you're wearing C goggles.
Well by looking above it seems your logic is. *snicker
Originally posted by Tha C-Masterso now you're admitting that you DID bring it up.. guess that makes you a liar don't it?
In response to your favorite tactic or bringing up a feat war with bad examples, so that¡¦s that.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Says something about those ninjas doesn¡¦t it?
Only if you look at it with a skewed C perspective.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
It does in an argument about whether he can win or not¡K *sigh * it almost hurts.
No it doesn't. No one's arguing that he can be hurt.. And there¡¦s certainly no argument ¡§about whether he can win or not¡¨.. He obviously loses.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Yes, I¡¦d say even a hot pop tart is more formidable
Well you say a lot of things..
So pop tart> Captain America. I see why you thought the trio didn't stand a chance in the trio thread..
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
[B] Well thank you for proving my previous two points and now owning yourself, you saved me having to do it for you.
Pretty sure I just proved that Hand>bears.. but whateva.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Or you can¡¦t specify the time so you¡¦ll choose the optimal one anyways. Who keeps bringing up ¡§knocked out¡¨ anyways, it seems to pop up like ¡§Spiderman¡¨ when the Wolverine Supporters are backed against a wall.
Who¡¦s backed against a wall here? You brought up the elk feat and insinuated that "he had been out", which if you read the story itself, you would know was a fallacy.. I'm just trying to tell you what happened.
Originally posted by Tha C-Master
I think you just explained why you love them. We all know Spiderman mopped the floor with the X-men before in this and the Ultimate universe right?
Spiderman proved to be a pain in the ass for a bunch of holding back x-men that were trying to capture him.. Everything Spiderman did was within his capabilities to do save sneak attack professor x. The X-men suffered from hardcore CIS in that skirmish and it¡¦s obviously not representative of a fight. That's the problem though isn't it? When you use feats they're always skewed.
Originally posted by Tha C-Masterpeople on this forum LOOOOVVVVE bad logic.. It's what makes the comic world go round.. and you need to realize that.
Anyone knows I hate featwars because they are stupid circular arguments that can be countered so easily because it¡¦s based off of comics inconsistency and no logic. A beat B, so B beat C, C is tougher than a, but I¡¦ll neglect it and use it anyways. They are used by fanboys like the word ¡§Spiderman¡¨ is used by them when they are losing because they don¡¦t want to use anything else and neglect the forum rules of PIS CIS. It won¡¦t change anyways, because people like bad logic.
However the logic that you're referencing is only applicable if it was being initiated as you stated.. it isn't; in this case C isn't tougher than A.
Originally posted by Tha C-MasterI'm not complaining about anything.
I also notice you are always the first person to get offensive in your posts and complain about it later, don¡¦t be a hypocrite please, I was perfectly civil with you. 😬
