Jason Kidd vs Steve Nash

He deserved to be in 2nd place that's what he deserved.

Sure he did.

✅

🙂

A wise man once told me, 3 is better than 2 and a championship means more than a MVP, never caught his name though. 😉

Originally posted by Lord Evolution
A wise man once told me, 3 is better than 2 and a championship means more than a MVP, never caught his name though. 😉

Kobe did deserve it more last year though, honestly.

And so did Dirk, who coincidently deserves it more than anybody this year (Nash better not steal it from him again).

nash is better.. he creates plays and shoots better than kidd. his passes r better and everyone plays better when he is there

Originally posted by Darth Martin
😆 Nice one!

Kobe did deserve it more last year though, honestly.

He is deserving every year (again) but last year he was really robbed.

Originally posted by Lord Evolution
A wise man once told me, 3 is better than 2 and a championship means more than a MVP, never caught his name though. 😉

Was it Shaq, the guy who was the best player, and carried the Lakers to all 3 championship while Kobe played the role of Scottie Pippen.

Originally posted by Darth Martin

Kobe did deserve it more last year though, honestly.

Please, if Kobe played like he did in the playoffs that whole year you might have an argument.

I'd laugh so hard if Nash were to win it again. 😆

Nash is good but is not on the level of Dirk, or Kobe for that matter. So far Dirk deserves it most this season.

Here Here!

Originally posted by Myth
Here Here!

It means I agree 😉

It's hard to actually rate who deserves it the most, but I also think Dirk should get it (that is...if he keeps up the pace).

WE DONT CARE ABOUT DIRK. Omfg, read the topic of this thread.

Okey, well, I still remember that game where they had to go to a triple bonus time, and that match held record for the Knick's most points let in and shot in... Almost everyone was fouled out except Nash vs Kidd, and they were both doing 3 pointers and getting field goals in, but when it came to the last second and it was Kidd's turn to shoot, which would determine who won.. Kidd missed. So currently Nash is much better.

But if we are talking about Kidd 5 years ago... Gee, i'm not sure. The difference isn't THAT big...

I would say Nash. He's a great teamplayer, he's the guy you want with the ball at the 4th quarter. Kidd is more of an assist player, after all.

You mean "overtime" and Nets, not Knicks. Don't confuse the two. And one game doesn't determine who's currently better. Think about their respective teams. Many players fouled out on both sides, but Nash still had Marion, Bell, Barbosa, etc. Kidd only had RJ, who had an off night btw. Carter fouled out, so basically Kidd had to run the show for NJ by himself, while Nash had other teammates who really helped him int the 3 overtimes. Unfair comparison. And anyway, Kidd finished with better stats. He had like 30, 14, and 14. Kidd is just as much of a team player as Nash, and oh yeah, Kidd is 10x better in defense.

We are talking about Kidd 5 years ago.

And who is this "we" you speak of when you said, "WE DONT CARE ABOUT DIRK". You are the only person who seems to not care. And it isn't completely irrelevant because we are saying Nash didn't/doesn't deserve MVP by saying Dirk did better.

C'mon, Nash is arguably the best guard in the leaugue, on one of the best teams in the league where he is the key focal point, and he doesn't/didn't deserve an MVP, right.

Shaq in his prime did better than most MVPs, and deserved more than one MVP, yet noone b!tched when Duncan, KG, and Kidd were getting more votes than him.