Originally posted by quanchi112
I asked you a question first which is more powerful the ig blast or Odin's best. You answer mine before you keep asking me questions.
Odin's best destroyed a galaxy, that blast didn't even seriously hurt Thanos, I'd say Odin's best definitely looked more powerful.
Now, exactly how powerful was that IG blast?
Originally posted by Silent MasterOdin only started affecting Thanos after a lengthy battle the first Odin blast affected him like a cool breeze.
Odin's best destroyed a galaxy, that blast didn't even seriously hurt Thanos, I'd say Odin's best definitely looked more powerful.Now, exactly how powerful was that IG blast?
A lot more powerful than Odin's best.
Originally posted by Black bolt zThe only reason Odin did damage was because he resorted to a weapon after a lengthy battle. The ig leaps and bounds more powerful than Odin in Magus' hands.
And then the second knocked him off his feet and the third sent him flying.Thanos's blasts did nothing.Prove it.
Originally posted by Black bolt zIt's my opinion it is which is common sense. Odin only damaged him through a lengthy battle and after Thanos ran through a concentrated blast.
He drew his weapon after he knocked thanos halfway across asgard.Yes the IG is.You can't prove the blast was.
Originally posted by Silent MasterNeither have you.
You haven't provided any proof.
Originally posted by Black bolt zOnly due to Thanos charging him. He easily tanked the first blast he couldn't run through ig blasts and mock the ig like he was against Odin.
No lengthy battle.Odin was knocking him across asgard without his weapon.And thanos took one blast.
Originally posted by Silent MasterI gave my opinion on the outcome which is speculation either way.
Why would I waste time providing evidence for your claims? That is your job.