"Exceptional debating"? I spit my milk out, and was rolling on the floor, laughing my ass off at that. You sound like some corny rival in Pokémon.
Now, really nearly nothing you wrote even proves anything. You just engaged in feat wars, as well as type up a huge response against things I didn't even mention, or was trying to argue against. In reality, "exceptional debating" is every post I make, every post Gideon makes, etc. You, and "exceptional", hell even "debating" in the same sentence? Rofl.
I mean, just look at the bullshit you posted on behalf of Kavar. Not just that, but let me show what you I'm talking about:
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
1. The handmaiden in KOTOR II described the fight between Revan and Malak as an Epic one. The vision of Duron Qel Droma also indicated Revan holding his ignited Light Saber and standing tall over fallen Malak. Even on official Star Wars blogs section, it was indicated in the profile entry of Revan that Revan killed Malak in a “Titanic” Duel. All these cases suggest that immense Saber Combat took place between Revan and Malak on Star Forge.
Thank you for being completely irrelevant. How does getting a description ("titantic", "epic", etc.) indicate anything about a lightsaber duel, as you said 'all these cases'? Oh? What's that? They don't?
Now, can you provide me with any proof that it was specifically, and undoubtedly just a saber duel, as Nebaris' initial post implied? Thought not, so go back to the sandlot, junior.
Now obviously Revan was not posing there with his Light Saber.
So, because he's merely got his lightsaber pointed down, and whatnot, it was a straight lightsaber duel? If that's the case Count Dooku never tried to assault Obi-Wan with Force lightning in AotC, simply because to anyone who saw just that part where Dooku is about to bring his blade down on Obi-Wan, it would've looked as if they were dueling the entire time.
Thanks for, again, proving nothing. For all we know, they had a huge Force battle initially, and ended it off in a short, two second samurai saber duel, or similar circumstances. We don't know what happened, and you can't make a deduction based off the evidence we currently have. Too bad, so sad.
2. The above cases suggest nothing about straightforward lightsaber combat, nor do they prove much of anything, except that the duel was seemingly close; which means that Revan didn't utterly demolish Malak.
The entire Force that Malak had on his disposal was indeed very powerful and with support from Bastilla’s Battle Meditation, they were invincible.
That just furthers my point. Thanks for the support.
But SW Databank also used word “he” when referring to Malak , when using the term “nearly unstoppable”.
Wow, you're not lying at all. Let's see the quote from the databank:
"Malak was nearly unstoppable, but the Republic emerged from that epic conflict victorious, as the Star Forge was eventually destroyed."
It says "Malak", not whatever you've suggested. So, what are you smoking? Furthermore, even if it did, it really doesn't matter, because if you had any grasp over the English language (you don't), you'd know that nearly the entire paragraph was dedicated to talking about the Republic against Malak's forces, likewise, it states that the Republic won due to the fact that Star Forge was destroyed, so we can make an inference through that, that it was insinuating Malak was nigh unconquerable, because of all the support he had at his disposal (Star Forge, Bastila, etc.).
The choices of words do matter here as this is mentioned in an official source. They could have said that Malak’s Forces were nearly unstoppable when mentioning this but they did not and instead chose to say that Malak was nearly unstoppable.
Again, you have no grasp over the English language. It's clearly indicating that the Star Forge's infinite supply of forces are what is making him "nearly unstoppable", hence the beginning, and end of the lines talking about "Republic forces", and "Malak's forces".
Even if you don't want to believe such, the quote is up for interpretation, ergo you cannot say that "Ooh! Malak himself is nearly unstoppable", and act as if it matters much, because it can be said both ways, and you can't prove yours as being absolutely correct (neither can I, but that's not what I'm trying to do anyways).
^
You see, if I want to take down your argument, I will. It's not hard, I just have to take time I'm not going to take, because in my perspective, your posts are pathetic, and the one you made in response to mine was needlessly lengthy, because it didn't prove much of anything.