Odin vs Tyrant

Originally posted by Larceny
What don't you understand about me caring little about the forum consensus?

As long as Odin's feats remain superior o Tyrants than I'll stand firm in my belief that he can defeat him. It matters not that I'm the only one standing with this view.

From what you've shown, you know very little about Odin.

The unbias logical choice would be to choose that character depicted as more powerful in comics. I've done so.

Are debates are depended entirely on feats. Forum rules you know?

The creator of the characters have decided already who the more powerful of the two are. One being depicted as more powerful than the other. 🙂

Originally posted by Larceny
Nope, I've ben arguing with the belief that this was full powered Tyrant. A full powered Tyrant that fought an ambiguous Galactus, and was unsure if he actually destroyed a galaxy. 🙂

Originally posted by lando005
if you want to stand firm in your belief then go ahead but stop posting here then because this matter is already resolved we all believe tyrant to be odin's superior and like it or not you are not convincing anyone otherwise so you are simply wasting your time to continue. I've told you i ave an average knowledge of odin and from my stand point he looses case close end of story and the creators have not stated who is more powerful but if you insist on draging this out any further i will soon correct that and get their statements myself if need be. Dont be so one side with feats alone tyrant never had a chance to do any feats stop clinging to that as your validation for odin. If you want to continue we can do this from now till we're 80 but as long as the facts of the tyrant/thanos fight remain your not going to win

Lando please stop acting as if you've proved something. You've proved nothing other than your lack of knowledge of Odin.

Know, I think I've done fairly well. You can't even prove Tyrant destroyed a galaxy, and I've not only proved that Odin's capable of doing that, but much more.

Your going to get Stan Lee's statement? Go ahead, he's the one that depicted Odin as powerful as he is. The destruction of multiple galaxies, the tearing of he the multi-verses fabric, simultaneously fighting on every plain of existence, the re-ignition of suns, that recreation of life, etc. All done by Stan Lee. Feats that completely dwarf Tyrants on feat of being defeated by an ambiguous Galactus.

Feats mean all on these boards, thus Odin wins.

Originally posted by lando005
you and i have been arguing the thanos fight and based off of that there is a huge difference in power you cant just jump from odin having trouble beating thanos to claiming he rivals galactus

Here we go with this Thanos fight again. We've long evolved past this but you can continue clinging and lying.

Originally posted by Larceny
Lando please stop acting as if you've proved something. You've proved nothing other than your lack of knowledge of Odin.

Know, I think I've done fairly well. You can't even prove Tyrant destroyed a galaxy, and I've not only proved that Odin's capable of doing that, but much more.

Your going to get Stan Lee's statement? Go ahead, he's the one that depicted Odin as powerful as he is. The destruction of multiple galaxies, the tearing of he the multi-verses fabric, simultaneously fighting on every plain of existence, the re-ignition of suns, that recreation of life, etc. All done by Stan Lee. Feats that completely dwarf Tyrants on feat of being defeated by an ambiguous Galactus.

Feats mean all on these boards, thus Odin wins.

Originally posted by Larceny
Here we go with this Thanos fight again. We've long evolved past this but you can continue clinging and lying.

Originally posted by lando005
i haven't attempted to prove anything with tyrant destroying galaxies, i prefer a much more direct approch which is why i stuck to the thanos fight you cant ask for a better direct comparison than that. you failed to prve odin did better all you got to go on was thanos was down in that fight and have attempted to move on to the galaxy feat because you know odin would have more feats in that area

My following post will be my best imitation of you and your bullshit logic.

Odin's more powerful than Tyrant because when Odin fought Surfer, Surfer was oneshotted yet against Tyrant he lasted...... Direct comparison, and we can ignore all other feats because they don't matter......

That = bullshit 🙂

Originally posted by lando005
i'm not lying everyone else said the same thing so we're all lying now? your the only one who sees the truth come on you cant be that delusional that's why you choose to avoid this topic

I didn't avoid it, I simply grew tired of arguing about how bad Odin beat Thanos, but according to your logic Odin is more powerful than Tyrant because while Tyrant allowed Tyrant to last Odin one shotted him.

Originally posted by Larceny
My following post will be my best imitation of you and your bullshit logic.

Odin's more powerful than Tyrant because when Odin fought Surfer, Surfer was oneshotted yet against Tyrant he lasted...... Direct comparison, and we can ignore all other feats because they don't matter......

That = bullshit 🙂

Originally posted by Larceny
I didn't avoid it, I simply grew tired of arguing about how bad Odin beat Thanos, but according to your logic Odin is more powerful than Tyrant because while Tyrant allowed Tyrant to last Odin one shotted him.

the reason why i dont want to look at their whole scope of feats is because that would be an unfair advantage to odin he has a pluthera of feats to choose from while tyrant has next to none trying to compare them like that is really being one sided. However they do have that one thing in common and we can use thanos as a base to gauge their power one could almost make a mathematical equation out of it to me that is the better option

it's not that i dont want to discuss other feats with you it's just that tyrant doesn't have any the whole galaxy destroying feat is completely ambiguous and left to interpretation and often corrected and reconted later i dont view such feats as being a completely reliable source but a direct battle against an opponent of thanos's stature should give use much better results

Originally posted by lando005
and your interpritation is odin has been around for years and has a bunch of feats so he must be greater that tyrant who's only been around for about a week in comparison to him

Is your head really that hard? Quality over quantity you dufus.

Originally posted by lando005
this doesn't even make sense

the reason why i dont want to look at their whole scope of feats is because that would be an unfair advantage to odin he has a pluthera of feats to choose from while tyrant has next to none trying to compare them like that is really being one sided. However they do have that one thing in common and we can use thanos as a base to gauge their power one could almost make a mathematical equation out of it to me that is the better option

I meant Surfer. Odin was able to one shot Surfer while Tyrant had the same opportunity but allowed him to last. Thus Odin is more powerful.

Quality over quantity, and Odin has he more impressive feats. The same argument has been used for years in regards to Sentry vs Superman. Superman has the more impressive feats, hence he's stronger.

We can also use Surfer, whom it took Tyrant a harder time to beat.

Originally posted by lando005
it's not that i dont want to discuss other feats with you it's just that tyrant doesn't have any the whole galaxy destroying feat is completely ambiguous and left to interpretation and often corrected and reconted later i dont view such feats as being a completely reliable source but a direct battle against an opponent of thanos's stature should give use much better results

So you admit Odin has the superior feats?

Originally posted by Larceny
I meant Surfer. Odin was able to one shot Surfer while Tyrant had the same opportunity but allowed him to last. Thus Odin is more powerful.

Quality over quantity, and Odin has he more impressive feats. The same argument has been used for years in regards to Sentry vs Superman. Superman has the more impressive feats, hence he's stronger.

We can also use Surfer, whom it took Tyrant a harder time to beat.

Originally posted by Larceny
So you admit Odin has the superior feats?

Originally posted by lando005
here's the thing though sentry is still around and has time to make up more feats and is establishing his position if tyrant was still around today you may have a valid point for your case but that's simply not the case and why i say your wrong in your judgement

Why am I wrong? Because you wish me to be or do you have some logic behind your reasoning?

Originally posted by lando005
odin has tons of years worth of feats tyrant does not tyrant has his fight with galactus, his fight with the heralds and his fight with thanos pretty slim pickings to come up with a defense against years worth of feats

So you admit Thanos has the superior feats?

Originally posted by Larceny
Why am I wrong? Because you wish me to be or do you have some logic behind your reasoning?

Originally posted by Larceny
So you admit Thanos has the superior feats?

i'm assuming you ment odin