FrothByte
Nailcutter Massacre
strength: both are too near each other in terms of strength. strength feets nulled.
durability: same with strength. too near each other for a clear winner.
weapons: i still believe mjolnir is more powerful than lasso, bracelets, and headband... but lets just say they're equal.
speed: now everybody agrees ww is faster than thor right? but thor has faced runner, gladiator, silver surfer, and quicksilver and has never looked worse off for his lack in speed. he has shown that he is quite capable of matching super speedy beings. so... speed feats nulled. i don't think ww's speed should be used as a trump card in the arguments.
fighting ability: altho ww looks like she uses more acrobatic moves, i would argue that thor has thousands of years more experience in fighting than ww. but since we have no way to measure this, lets call it even.
so they're all tied up. what gives the edge to the other fighter? I would like to think that thor's versatility should give the win. He has so many methods of war at his disposal (thanks to mjolnir) that if he just uses his head, he should get the win. I mean, if they ever wrote this in comics, ww might get the win, but honestly it should be thor. he just has so much power in his disposal. that is the one thing clear here.