Pillow Biter
Senior Member
Originally posted by Q99
And he was also, y'know, transformed to be doomsday-y, cover-with bone, more muscle than normal form ^^Also he had help- Silver Swan stole her lasso early on to prevent an easier win.
There is nothing about him being amped physically in that issue. The Doomsday-like cosmetic changes are just a magical manifestation of his new bestial personal and unleashed rage. When Diana remarks on his strength, she isn't surprised by him being stronger than normal. She says she forgot how strong he was.
Any help by Swan is more than compensated for by Superman fighting like a mindless beast--something Diana clearly capitalizes on to survive. Nothing in that fight suggests Diana would win, or even draw, a fair fight with a smart Superman. This isn't evidence for Diana being equal to Clark in a fight.
Sacrfice, however, is. Though what I find weird about that fight is how much ambiguity it introduced. I spoke to Rucca directly on a rather obscure message board (might have been his website or blog) just a short time before that fight came out. Rucca was very straightforward in his opinion that Superman is more powerful than Diana, and overall more formidable in most kinds of situations (fighting robots, big groups with varied power sets, space armadas, etc.). But he thought that her martial skills and equipment were very effective in 1 on 1, primarily physical fights, between humanoid opponents--situations that martial arts are ideal for. Thus he felt Diana had a slight edge n a straight 1 on 1 fight versus Superman. I naturally tend to interpret the fight in Sacrifice in light of those comments--and give him the benefit of the doubt. But I find it curious why in the end he didn't write a fight that gave Diana an unambiguous victory. Having her pass out for a bit, and having Superman think she was Doomsday (who doesn't have weapons or fight like she does) introduces ambiguity. So why he didn't give her a totally clean win evades me. Maybe editorial got involved?