Oh boy again
I changed some of the sentences around, they are from multiple posts of yours
Originally posted by 2damnloud
All Kitty would be are Atoms. What happens to Atoms when exposed to electical fileds?
I'll let you answer this:
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Ionisation is when an atom or molecule loses electrons.
Ionization can also be the adding of electrons to an atom, as an Ion is a particle with a charge. Unimportant:
Originally posted by 2damnloud
It is in storm's realm of power to cause Kitty to lose electrons.
hmmmmmmmmmm....
this is interesting. Maybe I missed something in the thread, but do you have a scan of her ionizing matter outside of manipulating weather patterns? Or creating plasma from solid matter? I know she has the solar wind feat, but this seems much different.
For instance, just because spider-man climbs on walls doesn't mean he controls friction.
I am also unaware of what ionizing all of kitties molecules would do. We are describing a fictional character that can phase through walls, I don't assume that altering the charge of her body is going to do much considering the outlandish physics already involved in her powers. Damn, we need to name the logical fallacy of applying real world standards to fictional events...
SO
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Once again, this is a completely hypothetical situation. That is just a way for Storm to win.
and
Originally posted by 2damnloud
I have no evidence that Storm could do it to her in comics. It's only a hypothetical option for her since already can do it to other particles.
So, in neuro-science, this German biophysicist just hypothesized that neurons in fact communicate by sound rather than by electrical conduction.
Even though this guy's math works out, and he does raise an interesting theoretical point, at the end of the day, there is no direct evidence that this is how neurons function (With the exception of a very strange phenomenon he describes) and there is overwhelming evidence for the "Ion Channel Hypothesis".
To relate this to what you are saying, sure, you have an interesting point. I would be interested in seeing the evidence that Storm can ionize trillions of atoms at once in solid matter in a way that has nothing to do with weather.
However, unless I missed it, this has never happened.
Debating hypothetical would be nice. I tend to get carried away in debating what I know or would do with a power set in much the same way you are here. Unfortunately the type of hypothesizing you are doing here is unacceptable in a forum of discussion like this, simply because it would allow for further extrapolations like spider-man controls friction.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
You have no proof that Storm can't Ionize Kitty.
Unfortunately it is impossible to prove a negative.
Prove that there is not a tea cup orbiting the sun.
It is impossible.
Also, it is YOU who are claiming that Storm CAN ionize kitty, thus placing the burden of proof on you. There is no reason to believe that Storm can ionize kitty until you have provided the required evidence to support this claim.
So far you have given an unsupported hypothesis extrapolated from your interpretation of the real science behind fictional super powers. Not to sound cheeky, but that isn't a very strong argument.
There is a whole philosophy behind what makes a valid argument, it's been going on for thousands of years.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Storm still wins since there is no way for Kitty to get close to her, let alone HURT her, yet Storm has long range electrical attacks and Wind driven dibris attacks that could possibly, in ALL likelyhood, KILL Kitty.
And finally, I co-sign this.
I wouldn't put nearly as much of a slant on it as you have, I don't think this is easy for Storm either, and if she isn't smart, she is going down fast.
I personally think this will be an endurance test for them both, but Storm should be able to outlast Kitty by staying away, and picking her moments.
If kitty can stay intangible forever though, I don't see a win for Storm
