Originally posted by 2damnloud
And that would prove what?? 😕
...
your point?
that you are correct?
that there is evidence behind your reasoning?
You should really look into logical philosophy, especially about the idea of proof. It is NOT, and nor should it be, easy to prove anything. This prevents people from just being able to prove anything with mere speculation.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Why would she have to ionize matter "outside of weather" in order to ionize Kitty?? Electrons are electrons.
Well, since her powers are manifested in weather based phenomena, the idea that she could affect non weather items, like a solid human, is speculative. Even her most intriguing feat, the transmutation of air into a dress, is a weather based manipulation.
Really, you need to have on panel evidence when you say stuff like this.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Again, nix your "Storm should be doing other things argument." It can be said about every comicbook character.
Really? Can you make that argument for the Hulk?
It IS a valid point, one that I hadn't brought up, but you were astute enough to know what was coming, good job trying to outright dismiss it, although that is a logical fallacy called the "confirmation bias".
The reason that the "chronic underachiever" hypotheses does apply to your version of Storm is this: In comics, real matter manipulators don't waste their time with weather. It would be a complete waste. You are completely right, if Storm had access to the powers you say she does, then she would be at least low level herald. However, there is no evidence that even suggests she has access to this power. The fact that you cherry pick appearances for writers alluding to some previously unseen power level only further shows that you are reaching.
Think about it, if she was REALLY as powerful as you think, wouldn't you have 1000s of examples? She has been around for over 30 years.
So, unless you have a better matter manipulation feat than "weather manipulation" she is a weather manipulator and not a matter manipulator.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Kitty really wouldn't be "matter" anyomore anyway. She'd be Atoms, straight up Atoms.
are you able to tell me the difference between atoms and matter?
Originally posted by 2damnloud
In order for kitty to be intangable she seems to force her atoms to repel each other and......hmmmm.
Is this stated on panel or is it further speculation...
I have personally never seen an appearance where her body is in danger of ripping itself apart. Even when caught in explosions.
Originally posted by 2damnloud
I'm trying to figure out how storm can induce tangability. 🙂
See, here is the problem. You are trying to figure out.
Well, all due respect, but it doesn't matter in the least what you think or figure
Show it on panel and we can start discussing
Originally posted by 2damnloud
Storm's main avnue toward a win is her lectrical powers. I just have to figure out how she would use them. I'm on to something.
Considering DC posted a variety of scans showing that Shadowcat is
unaffected by electricity...
here is the post quoted for you:
Originally posted by DarkCrawler
Because part of her phasing power has always been, since the first comic she appeared in, that electricity does jack shit to her when she phases?
http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/3888/9distrupselectromagneticfieldsgp9.jpg
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/5596/13lightningdoesnotworkne6.jpg
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/6941/51destroyssateliteexplouy8.jpg
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/6732/53phasingcerebrori2.jpg
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6504/57scramblesystemshv6.jpg
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3445/59beatsskrull2zy2.jpg
In an honest intellectual discourse aimed at discerning the "fact" of the matter, you NEED to address these. Why is it that Storm's electricity will affect Kitty now, but not here:
http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/5596/13lightningdoesnotworkne6.jpg
However, I would hardly call your Storm pumping an honest intellectual discourse...
Originally posted by 2damnloud
I could say storm makes her into a bathing suit, she did do that. 💃
Wow... the strange thing is that there is MORE evidence for this claim than ANYTHING ELSE you have said. Simply because there is ONE scan of this, vs ZERO of the others.
On the main boards there is a discussion devoted strictly to what PIS is. I think it is called something like PIS vs "I don't like it, it didn't happen". Look that one up, there is some pretty good talk about why certain things are specifically admissible as valid.