You know what I don't like?

Started by BackFire5 pages
Mourn the loss of someone who was just walking along and got stabbed. Don't adopt the lame argument of "He got killed, just doing his job as a cop.". Putting themselves in the line of fire.

Why? Everyone knows anytime you leave the house you run the chance of getting killed in any number of ways. They made the choice to do it, so they shouldn't be mourned. The only people that whould be mourned apparently are people who get murdered while sleeping, but even that, they know when they sleep that they're vulnerable, they made the choice to sleep, so I guess we shouldn't mourne them either. Mourne no one.

Oh wait, maybe we can mourne babies, they didn't choose to be borne, so if they die it's not really their fault.

Then again, they did choose to try and swallow that fork...

But BackFire, "rebels" don't do socially acceptable things like 'mourning'...

Rebels aren't people, they'll eventually get AIDS from sharing a needle with the wrong guy/selling their ass to someone for pot money and die, they don't matter.

Seems like this vistor von always picks and arguement with someone about every forum he comments to. Strange! He did the same to my forum also. Someone is very lonely or something Dude you need a dog to argue with!

He's insecure about his masculinity. I hear he's really small in the pants.

I'm lying, I know he's very small in the pants.

I wish i understood this, but i dont.sorry.

I am not even going to ask how you KNOW

Originally posted by vandergirl
I am not even going to ask how you KNOW

I've seen it.

In his steadfast determination to deny his small affliction, he's posted photos of it all over the internet, particularly on gay porn sites.

His photos are usually met with laughter and confusion. Often times, anger, when his penis is mistaken for that of a 7 year old boys and thought to be a case of child pornography.

Originally posted by soin2cal
I wish i understood this, but i dont.sorry.

If you're referring to the post directly above yours:

"In the pants" refers to penis.

BackFire is referring to Victor Von Doom's penis as being very small.

Originally posted by BackFire
Why? Everyone knows anytime you leave the house you run the chance of getting killed in any number of ways. They made the choice to do it, so they shouldn't be mourned. The only people that whould be mourned apparently are people who get murdered while sleeping, but even that, they know when they sleep that they're vulnerable, they made the choice to sleep, so I guess we shouldn't mourne them either. Mourne no one.

Oh wait, maybe we can mourne babies, they didn't choose to be borne, so if they die it's not really their fault.

Then again, they did choose to try and swallow that fork...

Another good point.

AC, you can have whatever opinion you wish, but please do not pass it off as the "truth" as you did in this thread. Your opinion is not the truth, it is merely your opinion.

Pretty much all deaths should be mourned, some more than others, I think. Like I said before, I think that civil servants and members of the armed forces should be held in the highest regard for their sacrifice, as they are often killed protecting others or fighting for our country. To simply dismiss their deaths and say they shouldn't be mourned for simply because they took a dangerous position is simply asinine.

personally, I think mourning should be done by those who knew and cared about the person, rather than just everyone who does it just to be polite and human.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's a broad blanket judgement to make don't you think? There are [some] exceptions where death would seem preferable than living; e.g., what if you had an illness that was going to kill you for certain without the [medical] possibility of a "reversal" and the short time you had to life was nothing but chronic pain? Would it be "cowardly" to end your own suffering? Don't be so ready to judge.
Needless to say, my opinion is not 100% applicable. For illnesses like you mentioned, death might indeed be preferable in the face of difficult treatment coupled with the possibility of death. I admit when I wrote my opinion was I thinking of teen suicide rather than legitimate reasons. I'm just coming out my teen years myself, so that's where my thoughts were. I apologize.

In the cases of a persistent vegetative state or coma, I'm a staunch advocate of living wills, as well.

Originally posted by JacopeX
The Holocaust. If you were known to become as a Non survivor in the tragic time. Explain that. You are about to die a Painful death.
Again, I was thinking primarily of teen suicide in this day and age. Obviously in the cases of the Holocaust, a quick death would have been preferable.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Needless to say, my opinion is not 100% applicable. For illnesses like you mentioned, death might indeed be preferable in the face of difficult treatment coupled with the possibility of death. I admit when I wrote my opinion was I thinking of teen suicide rather than legitimate reasons. I'm just coming out my teen years myself, so that's where my thoughts were. I apologize.

No need to apologize, I just wanted more insight into your opinion; you gave it and I can sympathize with your angle/approach.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're referring to the post directly above yours:

"In the pants" refers to penis.

BackFire is referring to Victor Von Doom's penis as being very small.

LOL im meaning the thread in generally LOL!
I like to try and understand things.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Suggesting that holding an opinion different to yours, automatically means the people arguing have direct experience in the matter, reveals your frailty of mind. One who cannot even take into account the other side of an argument may as well argue with ones self in my opinion. I'll give you this quote to savour:
'The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.' F Scott Fitzgerald

ok.....all i did was ask a question. no need to let your english show.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
ok.....all i did was ask a question. no need to let your english show.

Showing my English? How exactly was I doing that? Is it the fact that I used a quote from an author?

*pssst* It's because you're black.

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you equate someone dying doing a needed dangerous job with suicide?

No, but I am as of yet unaware how much credit to give you.

Originally posted by vandergirl
Seems like this vistor von always picks and arguement with someone about every forum he comments to. Strange! He did the same to my forum also. Someone is very lonely or something Dude you need a dog to argue with!

How very sweet.

Originally posted by BackFire
He's insecure about his masculinity. I hear he's really small in the pants.

I'm lying, I know he's very small in the pants.

They appear small because they are spectacularly filled.

(B-by male organs).

(M-mine).

Thanks for viewing me as a rebel, Robtard. Perhaps just accepting that not mourning the loss of nobodies is actually acceptable would have been a better choice.

Originally posted by BackFire
Why? Everyone knows anytime you leave the house you run the chance of getting killed in any number of ways. They made the choice to do it, so they shouldn't be mourned. The only people that whould be mourned apparently are people who get murdered while sleeping, but even that, they know when they sleep that they're vulnerable, they made the choice to sleep, so I guess we shouldn't mourne them either. Mourne no one.

Oh wait, maybe we can mourne babies, they didn't choose to be borne, so if they die it's not really their fault.

Then again, they did choose to try and swallow that fork...

I'm saying if you are "about" mourning random loss, then mourn who didn't invite it.

-AC

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
No, but I am as of yet unaware how much credit to give you.

Well, it was a rhetorical question, but there it is; the answer to your 'hopes' and 'imagininings.