New Abortion law, about ultra-sounds...

Started by Alliance17 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
I am not debating "she" has to have the child as this topic is not about abortions being legal/illegal.

I just don't see why people assume childbirth and being a parent is such a horrible thing and it will ruin lives... as you put it "feeding a parasite". That was my point/question a few post above

Are you a parent yourself?

Originally posted by Alliance
Are you a parent yourself?

Yes.

Then surely you must understand the fear of not being able to provide for a child.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yes. But why should she have to go through 9 months of discomfort feeding a parasite?

Because unless she was raped, she knew exactly what she was doing.

Yes, because sex=preganancy and other things don't affect people's judgement.

You don't fear that if every single woman gave birth every single time she got pregnant, that the overpopulation would increase ?

What stupid rationale.

Originally posted by Alliance
What stupid rationale.

Uh Oh....is this about the Islam thing ? 😬

How is that rationale stupid ?

Do you know how often women use birth control? How often women have sex ? If Sithsaber's proposal to end abortion and stop usage of birth control were to be passed, we would have serious problems...

We have "serious" population problems anyway, abortion in the US isn't significant.

Originally posted by Alliance
We have "serious" population problems anyway, abortion in the US isn't significant.

Abortion is not....but if Abortion were banned that would contribute to the problems. We already have over population issues in the U.S.A. and all over the world....If Sithsaber had his way, we would be overpopulated beyond measure.

If abortion is not significantly detreacting from the population, its suspension would not significantly increase it.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and no creadible reason why we should believe your sensationalism.

Why would you need an Ultra Sound for an abortion?

Originally posted by Alliance
If abortion is not significantly detreacting from the population, its suspension would not significantly increase it.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about and no creadible reason why we should believe your sensationalism.

Again this is about the Islam thing, isn't it ?

You have never spoken to me this way until my recent speakings against the Quran...wow bro, get over it already.

Secondly, you misunderstand my point...if Abortion and Birth Control had definate restrictions placed over them, then YES we would have major problems...not immediate, but in the long run.

Fact:

1) We are ALREADY over populated.....so is much of the world, in terms of space and resources.

2) Guess what..most women have something called SEX....very OFTEN 😱

And you know what ? There are a LOT of pregnancies, both in teenage girls and young women....

You know what helps these things ? Birth control baby 😉

Likewise, Abortion helps as well. At least the option of it being there DOES....If Abortion and Birth Control were banned, we would have serious problems...not immediately, but in the long run. It would make the biggest difference.

Your argument that it wouldn't make a difference is as ABSURD as when Conservatives argue that the Environment can "take one more for the team" in terms of pollution and industrialization ****ing up our planet and rapidly increasing our Global Warming....

And seriously...quit being such an *******.....get over our past arugment already. You seem to be taking this more personal than myself. Stop being a fk baby.....either prove me wrong with facts, or don't address me at all...but do not continue to insult me left and right like you have been doing for the past 2 days

Actually Alliance, don't bother...you are on my Ignore .....

I refuse to address someone who simply wants to pull a fight in every thread.....

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Because unless she was raped, she knew exactly what she was doing.

Women are NOT the only ones responsible for getting pregnant. The guy knew what he was getting into as well, if you want to go by that reasoning. Do not make it out like it's entirely the woman's fault when they are facing an unwanted pregnancy because it is not.

And if a couple has sex, and uses contraception, and it fails, then why should they have to have an unwanted child? Why should the woman have to go through with the pregnancy? They took precautions but it didn't work.

Tell me this, Sithsaber -- are you for or against welfare?

Originally posted by Alliance
Then surely you must understand the fear of not being able to provide for a child.

Yes, I clearly understand that... I do not think a majority of abortions are for that reason and even then, adoption would provide for the child if that is the leading concern.

But then again, this has more to do with abortions being legal/illegal...

Originally posted by Lana
Women are NOT the only ones responsible for getting pregnant. The guy knew what he was getting into as well, if you want to go by that reasoning. Do not make it out like it's entirely the woman's fault when they are facing an unwanted pregnancy because it is not.

And if a couple has sex, and uses contraception, and it fails, then why should they have to have an unwanted child? Why should the woman have to go through with the pregnancy? They took precautions but it didn't work.

Tell me this, Sithsaber -- are you for or against welfare?

Men are the gas women are the brakes?

Originally posted by Bardock42
The hell? That basically totally makes no sense. You are evil authoritarian ****ers. That's basically all there is to say about pro-life people. So, why don't you think about making the lives of actual living people better for a change, instead of fighting for not self conscious, parasitical lump of cells?

Actually, it makes perfect sense.

Now, if we're dispensing with ad hominems:

You're an immoral, indulgent, douchewad **** who is a slave to his most base of desires and espouses principles that indicate his moral degradation. Maybe you should think about doing the right thing instead of what feels good.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Actually, it makes perfect sense.

Now, if we're dispensing with ad hominems:

You're an immoral, indulgent, douchewad **** who is a slave to his most base of desires and espouses principles that indicate his moral degradation. Maybe you should think about doing the right thing instead of what feels good.

You over use the word "immoral"....you sit there and preach....how much moral good are you responsible for ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You over use the word "immoral"....you sit there and preach....how much moral good are you responsible for ?

The prevention of evil ought to be defined as good, and your argument has little bearing on this conversation. Yet more ad hominem STFU Urizenus.