GEB vs Merlyn/The Brothers/LT

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Did you get what I just said. The retcon didn't happen. If it were sanctioned by DC, then marvel could have used the Spectre's name and Image. They didn't have permission to do an official retconn thus they had to say hooded spectral ally. And It was implied that The LT had to wiat for the Go ahead to even retconn the brothers from the hooded spectral ally.

Actually Marvel didn't mention Spectre because Spectre has NOTHING to do with Marvel.

SO they used a term that alludes to it being Spectre, to give the reader referrence of the Brothers' originality, which involved Spectre.

But had Marvel used Spectre name, this would suggest that Spectre is involved in the Cosmological affairs of Marvel,

which is impossible.

The whole point of the RETCON, is to make them Marvel's Brothers,

NOT Marvel's and Spectre's.

LT Mvell 👆

Originally posted by Mr Master
Actually Marvel didn't mention Spectre because Spectre has NOTHING to do with Marvel.

SO they used a term that alludes to it being Spectre, to give the reader referrence of the Brothers' originality, which involved Spectre.

But had Marvel used Spectre name, this would suggest that Spectre is involved in the Cosmological affairs of Marvel,

which is impossible.

The whole point of the RETCON, is to make them Marvel's Brothers,

NOT Marvel's and Spectre's.

Marvel cannot, I repeat Cannot, take jointly created characters and make them all thier own. The only thing marvel did was create 3 new Characters. Two megaverses and someone called the Hooded Spectral Ally. Thanks.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Marvel cannot, I repeat Cannot, take jointly created characters and make them all thier own. The only thing marvel did was create 3 new Characters. Two megaverses and someone called the Hooded Spectral Ally. Thanks.

As you wish. 🙂

Originally posted by Darth Wolverine
LT Mvell 👆

Cool

Originally posted by Mr Master
As you wish. 🙂

Not as I wish. As the Copy right laws of the land wish.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Not as I wish. As the Copy right laws of the land wish.

"Laws" that were ignored right here:

"Two Siblings whom the Tribunal has a place for in HIS great scheme of things"

On Panel and in the Bio, your "Laws" were RAPED

"the Living Tribunal also helped fashion the twin Entities the Brothers,

each of whom became the guardian of a different Megaverse"

(up close)

SO they just happen to look EXACTLY ALIKE,

and they just happen to have the EXACT SAME NAME. 😆

So Marvel can get sued for using Spectre's name,

but not the Brothers name and look,

which according to you, HALF belongs to DC.

Originally posted by Mr Master
"Laws" that were ignored right here:

"[B]Two Siblings whom the Tribunal has a place for in HIS great scheme of things"

On Panel and in the Bio, your "Laws" were RAPED

"the Living Tribunal also helped fashion the twin Entities the Brothers,

each of whom became the guardian of a different Megaverse"

(up close)

SO they just happen to look EXACTLY ALIKE,

and they just happen to have the EXACT SAME NAME. 😆

So Marvel can get sued for using Spectre's name,

but not the Brothers name and look,

which according to you, HALF belongs to DC. [/B]

You just can't stand to be wrong. You are really not that great of a debator when you look at it. You are doing nothing but trying to force your view of how things should be. The brothers from marvel vs DC were not retconned becuz they were published in a join book and must be retconned with consent of both companies. No where has DC established that this retconn was approved by them. What if DC decides to take two similiar looking "brothers" and make them Trillions of times more powerful than the Spectre and his hooded 3 faced freind? Then what? You see how silly that is. Now go run along.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
You just can't stand to be wrong. You are really not that great of a debator when you look at it. You are doing nothing but trying to force your view of how things should be. The brothers from marvel vs DC were not retconned becuz they were published in a join book and must be retconned with consent of both companies. No where has DC established that this retconn was approved by them. What if DC decides to take two similiar looking "brothers" and make them Trillions of times more powerful than the Spectre and his hooded 3 faced freind? Then what? You see how silly that is.

Now go run along.

firefirefireph

Took you long enough.

Originally posted by Mr Master
firefirefireph

YOu do this alot when you really have no comeback. Oh master debator. As I said, your tricks get old.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
YOu do this alot when you really have no comeback. Oh master debator. As I said, your tricks get old.

What is there to come back with?

You think being intransigent makes one a good debater? no2

All you've done is pump your unsupported opinion,

while I have presented OBVIOUS On Panel proof and a Bio reference to back it up.

So whatever.

Originally posted by Mr Master
What is there to come back with?

You think being intransigent makes one a good debater? no2

All you've done is pump your unsupported opinion,

while I have presented OBVIOUS On Panel proof and a Bio reference to back it up.

So whatever.

YOu have presented no proof. The brothers come from a DC marvel book. now produce DC/Marvel confirmation on the retcon or shut the kcuf up.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
YOu have presented no proof. The brothers come from a DC marvel book. now produce DC/Marvel confirmation on the retcon or shut the kcuf up.

Yes curse, that's your only outlet, frustration.

AGAIN!!!

On Panel and in the Bio, your "Laws" were RAPED

SO they just happen to look EXACTLY ALIKE,

and they just happen to have the EXACT SAME NAME. 😆

So Marvel can get sued for using Spectre's name,

but not the Brothers name and look,

which according to you, HALF belongs to DC.

Originally posted by Mr Master
Yes curse, that's your only outlet, frustration.

AGAIN!!!

[B]On Panel and in the Bio, your "Laws" were RAPED

SO they just happen to look EXACTLY ALIKE,

and they just happen to have the EXACT SAME NAME. 😆

So Marvel can get sued for using Spectre's name,

but not the Brothers name and look,

which according to you, HALF belongs to DC. [/B]

LOL you are indeed one of the seriously worst debators ever. You present your on panel proof and everyone is supposed to go oooh awe becuz you posted some scans. The brothers Appeared only in DC vs. Marvel. Thus those two imitations are nothing but marvel creations. Marvel is only one half of the omnipotent power that birthed these two. Which means these two could never be the real brothers becuz it took the power of two companies to produce them and two companies is the only way to reduce them.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
LOL you are indeed one of the seriously worst debators ever.

Gibberish.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
You present your on panel proof and everyone is supposed to go oooh awe becuz you posted some scans.

You present NO on panel proof, you present NO Bio proof,

you don't even know where you get 99% of your info,

and eveyone is supposed to what?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
The brothers Appeared only in DC vs. Marvel. Thus those two imitations are nothing but marvel creations. Marvel is only one half of the omnipotent power that birthed these two. Which means these two could never be the real brothers becuz it took the power of two companies to produce them and two companies is the only way to reduce them.

😴

Originally posted by Mr Master
Gibberish.

You present NO on panel proof, you present NO Bio proof,

you don't even know where you get 99% of your info,

and eveyone is supposed to what?

😴

I like not presenting on panel proof. And then when idiots call me nvrhadaclue, weeks or even months later, they find themselves arguing the same thing I did, or someone else coming in and peeking into our forums and posting scans of what I said. I like to be the underdog and then turn around and be right. As I said, it took the power of Two Companies to create the brothers and it shall take the power of Two companies to retconn the brothers. All you did was present proof that Marvel created some new characters for thier reality.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
I like not presenting on panel proof. And then when idiots call me nvrhadaclue, weeks or even months later, they find themselves arguing the same thing I did, or someone else coming in and peeking into our forums and posting scans of what I said. I like to be the underdog and then turn around and be right.

sarcasticclap

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
All you did was present proof that Marvel created some new characters for thier reality.

That just happen to look exactly the same as the Brothers,

and just happen to have the exact same name,

and even the same exact founded story line concerning the Brothers,

like they're "eternal struggle" ...

I think your intrasigence is taking obvious common sense away from you. 🙂

Originally posted by Mr Master
sarcasticclap

That just happen to look exactly the same as the Brothers,

and just happen to have the exact same name,

and even the same exact founded story line concerning the Brothers,

like they're "eternal struggle" ...

I think your intrasigence is taking obvious common sense away from you. 🙂

LOL, You have no logic. The Orginal brothers each represented a company each. Why in teh **** would DC let the LT hold one of it's megaverses? You have no logic. AT ALL. DC wouldn't let The LT be judge over something that is suppose to represent thier company. GTFOH.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
LOL, You have no logic. The Orginal brothers each represented a company each. Why in teh **** would DC let the LT hold one of it's megaverses? You have no logic. AT ALL. DC wouldn't let The LT be judge over something that is suppose to represent thier company. GTFOH.

You're the one claiming that's Marvel and DC, but Marvel has already told us through the Bio and On Panel depictions that those are Two Megaverses that belong to Marvel.

So you "GTFOH" with your ignorance.

If you're considering Marvel vs DC as canon,

are you ready to concede that LT and Spectre Owned and almost OBLITERATED the Supreme embodiments of DC & Marvel?

If you're gonna claim something, go all the way, not just half.

Originally posted by Mr Master
You're the one claiming that's Marvel and DC, but Marvel has already told us through the Bio and On Panel depictions that those are Two Megaverses that belong to Marvel.

So you "GTFOH" with your ignorance.

If you're considering Marvel vs DC as canon,

are you ready to concede that LT and Spectre Owned and almost OBLITERATED the Supreme embodiments of DC & Marvel?

If you're gonna claim something, go all the way, not just half.

Marvel Vs. DC in no way looked as if The spectre and LT did any kind of pwning. They both stated several times that they couldn't fix what was being imbalanced. then they were like gnats to the brothers. in a last ditch effort, the Spectre and the LT merged the realities, ( which is within thier power to do,) to save them. But They only happened to do this becuz the brothers were unaware of this plan of attack. I can catch mike tyson off guard and knock him on his ass. But when he gets up, I better run. You sir are done. I tire of arguing with a weak debator with pretty pictures and a rediculous sense of security in his OPINION! DC is not putting the sum of it's reality in the hands of the LT. Now get outta here with that bullshit.