Originally posted by Battlemaster
LOL, is that all you can rebuttal against for now?
You are an amazing example of human ignorance. Perhaps you should volunteer yourself to scientific study, so that we might discover the true limits of stupidity. I'm certain that they might even compensate you for your time.
So, I'll get to responding. In the meantime, don't try to correct my grammar. You've looked incredibly stupid (twice) trying to.
You'd know all about that.
From an observational standpoint, yes, watching you try to debate has made me absolutely familiar with the level of ignorance a human can exhibit.
Yes it is.
Wow, so you're agreeing that I'm right, and it is fortunate that I am? Thanks...
He's a retard. Everyone knows it.
He can act retarded. But, is he all the time? No. He doesn't live or function as a retard (acting and functioning are two different things). You seem to do both, though.
He'd kick your butt any day of the week.
Not that it matters, and I'm sure he's pleased that you highlight his debating skills, but has - and would still likely be - the first one to disagree with you there.
I love you too.
You didn't understand me, did you? I suppose I'll have to learn to speak Stupid. Don't suppose you could tutor me?
Duh? lol
Glad that we agree.
Your welcome
My dear, if you're going to correct or insult someone's grammar, be sure that you are naturally skilled with the English language.
"You're welcome". You're = contraction for 'you are'. 'Your' is possessive and makes no sense.
This is the third time I've corrected you.
More skilled than you. 😛
Right.
I know because you sound dumb. 😆
Again, not that it matters, but everyone else on this thread - including Darth Sexy - has agreed with me. "Sounding dumb" isn't something that I do.
True that, but the fact I've presented means more than your mongoloid opinion.
You actually have presented nothing but an unsupported opinion. My opinion is reinforced by facts from multiple sources. You have one source and it doesn't even apply.
Yeah, and I was making a point of how most of the people, most likely didn't know exactly what it was.
You failed to make that point, and your opinion is irrelevent. The idea of the Sith was around when those authors wrote the novels in question; they knew what a "Dark Lord of the Sith" was.
What Path of Destruction says is completely consistant with the rest of the SW Universe?
Wow, news to me.
No, the sources I have cited aren't an inconsistency. The Path of Destruction book is an inconsistency, because it contradicts dozens of previous sources, and it doesn't apply, because Bane was not present during Sidious's rise to power. Thus, if he decided to give Maul the title of "Dark Lord of the Sith", it isn't dependant on Bane.
No, but I can see you are, amongst other things.
I live in the real world. In the real world (this one), people are agreeing with me, not you. I've corrected you three times. Reading comprehension isn't something you excell in.
You claimed Sith Master was a title, not just Master. Genius. 😛
"Sith Master" = Sidious is a Sith and he is a Master. Thus, he is a Sith Master.
Heh, you could never rock my world, pal. 😎
If you say so.
Yup, and I already salute to you, General. tank
The prize for "Biggest Nonsensical Statement" is clearly in your favor, with this...
You are afraid. Afraid Im right.
...and this statement, too.
Dark Lord is the central title of leadership for the Sith.
No. In Sidious's case, it is the title of both Sith Lords.
Sith do not share leadership. Bane saw that.
What Bane saw is irrelevent.
Sith Lord by the way, is the common high ranking for a Sith, like Jedi Master for Jedi.
Gee, thanks for this update.
Exactly. 😉
Yeah, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Thank you, General Obvious, Sir! w00t
Sweetheart, I corrected you, when you made an insult. This doesn't warrant a "General Obvious" comment when I proved you wrong. Witty retorts aren't your thing, I see.
Thank you. Hehe
Right...
Lol, Its not only your grammar I have to correct... 😆
Again, you don't understand. You insulted my grammar; you did not correct it. I corrected your grammar three times, and that means you're nothing special (nor are you superior to me) when it comes to grammar.
I don't think I can possibly look any stupider than you! wink3
Well, what a "stupid" person thinks isn't much, now is it? You're proving that to us every second.
Battlemaster, I'm not responding to that at all until you learn to use the quote function properly. You've slapped in your rebuttles with my remarks, and expect me to sort them out? Hardly. Take the time to go back and quote.
Once I get back - if you've performed properly - I'll respond. Until then, this discussion is over.
Edit: And if you continue to act ridiculously illogical and not actually respond to my statements other than with a "LOL", don't espect a response.
From an observational standpoint, yes, watching you try to debate has made me absolutely familiar with the level of ignorance a human can exhibit.
I was referring to you. But of course you were too dumb to understand that. hysterical
Wow, so you're agreeing that I'm right, and it is fortunate that I am? Thanks...
Sarcasm? hehe
He can act retarded. But, is he all the time? No. He doesn't live or function as a retard (acting and functioning are two different things). You seem to do both, though.
Says the retard 😉
Not that it matters, and I'm sure he's pleased that you highlight his debating skills, but has - and would still likely be - the first one to disagree with you there.
Perhaps. 😎
You didn't understand me, did you? I suppose I'll have to learn to speak Stupid. Don't suppose you could tutor me?
I can’t tutor someone who happens to be a Professor in it. 😆
Glad that we agree.
Sarcasm again? LOL!
My dear, if you're going to correct or insult someone's grammar, be sure that you are naturally skilled with the English language.
Right back at ya.
"You're welcome". You're = contraction for 'you are'. 'Your' is possessive and makes no sense.
Like you.
This is the third time I've corrected you.
You think your correcting me. In reality your making me double over in my chair in laughter! LOL!
Right.
Yup.
Again, not that it matters, but everyone else on this thread - including Darth Sexy - has agreed with me. "Sounding dumb" isn't something that I do.
LOL…
You actually have presented nothing but an unsupported opinion. My opinion is reinforced by facts from multiple sources. You have one source and it doesn't even apply.
My one source is actually correct. But then again this is one of the things we’re arguing about.
You failed to make that point, and your opinion is irrelevent. The idea of the Sith was around when those authors wrote the novels in question; they knew what a "Dark Lord of the Sith" was.
Apparently not.
By the way its spelled irrelevant not irrelevent, O’ master of the English language AKA “English Master”. LOL!
(Since you speak English and are a Master of it, LOL!)
No, the sources I have cited aren't an inconsistency. The Path of Destruction book is an inconsistency, because it contradicts dozens of previous sources, and it doesn't apply, because Bane was not present during Sidious's rise to power. Thus, if he decided to give Maul the title of "Dark Lord of the Sith", it isn't dependant on Bane.
Doesn’t matter. Sidious followed Bane’s Rule of Two faithfully.
I live in the real world. In the real world (this one), people are agreeing with me, not you. I've corrected you three times. Reading comprehension isn't something you excell in.
It’s excel not excell.
"Sith Master" = Sidious is a Sith and he is a Master. Thus, he is a Sith Master.
You claimed it was an actual title, genius. 😄
If you say so.
Oh, But I do. 😄
The prize for "Biggest Nonsensical Statement" is clearly in your favor, with this...
No…no…I don’t deserve it…It belongs to you my dear Professor of English, AKA English Master.
...and this statement, too.
Yay.
No. In Sidious's case, it is the title of both Sith Lords.
Therein lies an inconsistency.
What Bane saw is irrelevent.
No, because he instituted the Rule that all Sith were to follow later.
Again, It’s Irrelevant, Professor.
Gee, thanks for this update.
You’re welcome.
Yeah, you have no idea what you're talking about.
LOL…
Sweetheart, I corrected you, when you made an insult. This doesn't warrant a "General Obvious" comment when I proved you wrong. Witty retorts aren't your thing, I see.
Yes, General Obvious, Sir! tank
Right...
Sarcasam...Hehe! bangin
Originally posted by GideonAgain, you don't understand. You insulted my grammar; you did not correct it. I corrected your grammar three times, and that means you're nothing special (nor are you superior to me) when it comes to grammar.Now I've corrected yours...Professor! LOL!!!
[QUOTE]Well, what a "stupid" person thinks isn't much, now is it? You're proving that to us every second.
Or, is it that your proving it every second?
By the way, bravo for spelling second properly. clapping
I was referring to you. But of course you were too dumb to understand that. hysterical
Actually, I understood perfectly. I simply made a wittier retort.
Sarcasm? hehe
For future reference, this is the Internet. Emotion can be extremely difficult to trace, considering how we're not in person, thus, I cannot interpret inflections in your voice or attitude via vague text on a screen.
Says the retard 😉
How witty. Please, we both know that I am far from being retarded.
Perhaps. 😎
No, I can all but guarentee it.
I can’t tutor someone who happens to be a Professor in it. 😆
You call Nebaris a retard? Even he could come up with much funnier and wittier retorts than this.
Sarcasm again? LOL!
I have already addressed "sarcasm" and detecting it.
Right back at ya.
To be fair, you insulted my grammar first. I simply corrected you.
Like you.
I would give a sarcastic "how witty", but, frankly, but it's getting repetitive.
You think your correcting me. In reality your making me double over in my chair in laughter! LOL!
Perhaps you should just stick to the argument instead of trying to deliver witty remarks.
"You think you're correcting me", by the way.
Yup.
Yeah, I think you should stick to the argument.
LOL…
What an earthshaking response.
My one source is actually correct. But then again this is one of the things we’re arguing about.
You're not George Lucas. You do not determine "what is correct" and "what is not correct". I have a multitude of sources as opposed to your singular source. A source that is the intent of a long-dead Sith Lord which doesn't mean that Sidious actually executed it, verbatim.
Apparently not.
Why? Because you say so? Very convincing.
By the way its spelled irrelevant not irrelevent, O’ master of the English language AKA “English Master”. LOL!
(Since you speak English and are a Master of it, LOL!)
I didn't claim to be an "English master", LOL!
Doesn’t matter. Sidious followed Bane’s Rule of Two faithfully.
Yes, it does matter, actually. The sources that span Sidious's rise to power and Sith reign say that his apprentices were entitled "Dark Lord of the Sith". Thus, they apply more than Bane's intent.
It’s excel not excell.
Nice edit. Earlier, you had: "it's excel not excel".
You claimed it was an actual title, genius. 😄
No. I claimed that he was the Sith Master (because he is a Sith and a Master).
Oh, But I do. 😄
That made no sense. From this point on, if you want to debate, stick to the argument.
No…no…I don’t deserve it…It belongs to you my dear Professor of English, AKA English Master.
Actually, earlier, you said I was a professor of the Stupid language. Now I am a professor of English? Interesting.
Yay.
First, you say I deserve it, and then you give a sarcastic "yay" when I attribute it to you? Once again, stick to the argument...
Therein lies an inconsistency.
The PoD is, quite simply, wrong.
No, because he instituted the Rule that all Sith were to follow later.
Again, It’s Irrelevant, Professor.
Right. Like I said, what Bane "intended" for the Sith to doesn't mean that Sidious actually followed the instructions verbatim. In fact, the current "Sith Lord", Krayt, replaced Bane's Rule of Two with the Rule of One, thus proving that it is simply a tradition that any Sith can cast aside at any time.
You’re welcome.
Good, you've used the proper word.
LOL…
Stick to the argument, please.
Yes, General Obvious, Sir! tank
Again, that makes no sense. Stick to the argument, please.
Sarcasam...Hehe! bangin
I've already discussed sarcasm. Stick to the argument.
Now I've corrected yours...Professor! LOL!!!
There you are, then. We've both made mistakes, and yet you called me out first.
Or, is it that your proving it every second?
No, that would be you're. It is a contraction for "you are".
By the way, bravo for spelling second properly. clapping
Sweetheart, I think we've just proven that you're no better than me when it comes to spelling. Might wanna lay off that joke. 😉
Originally posted by Battlemaster
Guess you don't.
In the OT movies the word "Dark Lord" was never mentioned.
Many people assumed it was just the regular title of the Sith and not a singular leadership position.
And just to refresh your memory, Bane's interpretation of the Rule of Two (Which he completely agreed with and practiced to its every nuance) was the same method that Sidious utilised in his reign.Gideon, you seriously need to re-learn your knowledge of the Sith.
And no, Sith Master was a title cooked up by the Brotherhood, and Bane saw how retarded they were, since they decided to make all the Sith Dark Lords.
It would be like making everyone in the Senate a President. 🙄 [/B]
Originally posted by Battlemaster
Or, thinking about it more closely, It would be like making a prince a King just like his father and having two Kings ruling the same Kingdom.Royalty of that kind works on total power and control.
The Sith work in the very same way. They don't share any kind of power. [/B]
Originally posted by Battlemaster
What Path of Destruction says is completely consistant with the rest of the SW Universe?
Wow, news to me.
Sith do not share leadership. Bane saw that.
You better hope that you are a somewhat decent looking girl at the very least because you don't have much going for you in the way of logic or intelligence, and I either argue with smart people, or attractive people.
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Eh um... Too young and too old? That's if I acknowledge being in love with Advent and you... Ew....
Some things are better left unspoken. 😍
Lmao.
Edit: I'm not so arrogant as to speak for myself (though at my high school, girls say I'm good looking), but Advent's a hottie. 😍