Should Iran release the capture British Marines?

Started by WrathfulDwarf9 pagesPoll

British capture Marines.

Should Iran release the capture British Marines?

Or should they put them on trial?

What's your opinion?

My own...they should be return immediatly.

Re: Should Iran release the capture British Marines?

.

Oh goody, another sock...

who? TC?

Some stupid clowns sock who has just been restricted... fear not, the clownboy will make another as always.

Would Britain release captured Iranians?

Nobody would release their enemy.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Would Britain release captured Iranians?

Nobody would release their enemy.

-AC

Good point, Iran should be ready to have it's ass kicked then.

If Iran seeks peaceful negotiations concerning them being allowed to produce nuclear products, then holding British soldiers captive will definitely be counterproductive.

Like Doug Stanhope said, it's a bit presumptuous and arrogant to assume there are rules to war.

"You have to release our guys!". They are marines, the enemy in Iran's eyes. Britain wouldn't do the same.

Again, it's simple sense to me. You go to Iran, you risk having this happen to you. It'll never happen to me.

-AC

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh goody, another sock...

Where 😖hifty:

-Molly

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Like Doug Stanhope said, it's a bit presumptuous and arrogant to assume there are rules to war.

"You have to release our guys!". They are marines, the enemy in Iran's eyes. Britain wouldn't do the same.

Again, it's simple sense to me. You go to Iran, you risk having this happen to you. It'll never happen to me.

-AC

They weren't in Iran they were in Iraqi waters and were abducted by Iran who have changed the point at which they 'caught' them several times.

This was a real bad idea on Iran's part, when George want's an excuse to go to war, don't ever give him one.

Originally posted by Help
They weren't in Iran they were in Iraqi waters and were abducted by Iran who have changed the point at which they 'caught' them several times.

This was a real bad idea on Iran's part, when George want's an excuse to go to war, don't ever give him one.

That apostrophe does not belong in wants. George will just have to lump it, there's only a certain ammount wars you can have at once even if it is the 'almighty America'

Let them go.

The British Marines are bargaining chips during UN negotiations on new nuclear sanctions.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
That apostrophe does not belong in wants. George will just have to lump it, there's only a certain ammount wars you can have at once even if it is the 'almighty America'

Oh don't worry... if the "almighty America" attacks Iran, the UK will follow with some measure of support. Even then, it wouldn't be a war America couldn't handle alone, most likely it would only be blasting their nuclear capabilities back 10 years.

Also, the UK could surprise us all and do something military against Iran if the sailors aren't returned. That's also a slim possibility.

The soldiers should be released immediately unless Iran can prove that they tresspassed (which seems highly unlikely at this point).

Iran also needs to stop helping George Bush retain political power in the US by pulling stupid stunts like having the British soldiers say it is time to leave Iraq.

Originally posted by Alliance
...Iran also needs to stop helping George Bush retain political power in the US by pulling stupid stunts like having the British soldiers say it is time to leave Iraq.

hysterical

IMO, Iran is playing a dangerous game. Clearly its overall strategy is to provoke the West into military confrontation, thus inflaming the "War against Islam" to the next level.

Needless to say, he thinks the West will lose.

Like Hussein, Khadafy and others before them, Ahmadinejad fancies himself the savior of the Arab world.

Originally posted by Mindship
IMO, Iran is playing a dangerous game. Clearly its overall strategy is to provoke the West into military confrontation, thus inflaming the "War against Islam" to the next level.

Needless to say, he thinks the West will lose.

Like Hussein, Khadafy and others before them, Ahmadinejad fancies himself the savior of the Arab world.

''War against Islam'' you ought to be careful where you say that and whom to.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
''War against Islam'' you ought to be careful where you say that and whom to.

I know, especially since there is no war against the religion.