Should Iran release the capture British Marines?

Originally posted by Soleran
I would imagine they do receive basic training in regards to capture and confinement in Britain.

I'm talking about torture resistance, not just keeping your mouth shut and only giving your name and rank when asked what you're mission was/is. Besides, even special forces like the SAS break under torture, it's the human thing to do. Judging them because they admitted to whatever the Iranians wanted them to admit to is foolish.

Fact is, the first transmission the Iranians gave placed the them in Iraqi waters; they then later changed it (repeatedly I believe) to place them in Iranian waters. I'll place my bets on the British being the ones telling the truth.

Originally posted by GCG
In any case, Sailors and Marines should never break silence and loyalty. Brittle minds should have rang that bell earlier at their training camps.

Shame.

what if their is a gun to your head?

Originally posted by GCG
Am O quick to kudge ? How cerain ard we tyat bounfraies were respected as it seems that sowem people here xomment mnore than on what they should.
1 thing is for sure : If erhe sailors stayed on board the Cornwall, they would not have been capture/.

PS. My keyb oard is f*//- up ; Sorry Q

No worries about the keyboard, I understood.

...the first transmission the Iranians gave placed the them in Iraqi waters; they then later changed it (repeatedly I believe) to place them in Iranian waters. I'll place my bets on the British being the ones telling the truth.

wow. another false flag operation to stir up hatred against the iranians. not long now before we start to bomb them ay.

Originally posted by Deano
wow. another false flag operation to stir up hatred against the iranians. not long now before we start to bomb them ay.

🙄 It's what the lizard people want. 😆

you'll see.

how those in control must love the gullable ignorant

Originally posted by Deano
you'll see.

how those in control must love the gullable ignorant

I said three years ago that Iran is the problem and we (the US) will be at war with them. It just took longer.

Right.

So, because Western politicans / journalists say that they were NOT in Iranian waters, it MUST be true.
Because Western politicans and journalists don't lie. Its just Iranians that lie.

Lets get ONE thing straight right now.

If Iranian ships were floating about anywhere NEAR British or American waters, the UK and US government would scream bloody murder, war sirens would go off, and everyone would go schizo : ''WE'RE BEING ATTACKED BY AL-QAEDA!!''

Why is there this assumption that its Iranians who lied to deliberately take hostages. Why not that western politicans lie about the itnention of marines?
Why is that not a possibility?

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Right.

So, because Western politicans / journalists say that they were NOT in Iranian waters, it MUST be true.
Because Western politicans and journalists don't lie. Its just Iranians that lie.

Lets get ONE thing straight right now.

[b]If Iranian ships were floating about anywhere NEAR British or American waters, the UK and US government would scream bloody murder, war sirens would go off, and everyone would go schizo : ''WE'RE BEING ATTACKED BY AL-QAEDA!!''

Why is there this assumption that its Iranians who lied to deliberately take hostages. Why not that western politicans lie about the itnention of marines?
Why is that not a possibility? [/B]

1) They were in Iraqi waters, not American or British

2) Yes it's possible the "West" is lying, but I'm betting it's not. You can choose otherwise.

Originally posted by Deano
wow. another false flag operation to stir up hatred against the iranians. not long now before we start to bomb them ay.

America has almost been at war with Iran since the late 70's... Israel almost bombed them (by proxy of America) them a few months ago. This ISNT new news. Get with the program.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I said three years ago that Iran is the problem and we (the US) will be at war with them. It just took longer.

believe me. iran are not the problem. the invisible global elite are the problem. they already manipulated us into a war with iraq...now watch and see what they do with iran.

how many will be as ignorant and gullable this time eh?

Originally posted by Deano
believe me. iran are not the problem. the invisible global elite are the problem. they already manipulated us into a war with iraq...now watch and see what they do with iran.

how many will be as ignorant and gullable this time eh?

Oh God not the lizards!

Originally posted by BackFire
Oh God not the lizards!

You would think my now the Lizards would take care of him. 😂

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Right.

So, because Western politicans / journalists say that they were NOT in Iranian waters, it MUST be true.
Because Western politicans and journalists don't lie. Its just Iranians that lie.

im just curious, what has the iranian Government done that makes their word anymore credible than the british's?

Why do you side so quickly with a Government that is so against democracy, and the western culture?

Originally posted by Deano
wow. another false flag operation to stir up hatred against the iranians. not long now before we start to bomb them ay.

the sooner the better.

Originally posted by Robtard
1) They were in Iraqi waters, not American or British

2) Yes it's possible the "West" is lying, but I'm betting it's not. You can choose otherwise.

Since begining of the war, British servicemen, have crossed on Iranian side of Arvand river, in 2004.

What are the chances, that 3 years later, instead of 8, 15 British service men and woman get detained for almost exactly the same thing.

Here's what matters: someone's lying; convenient ass timing.

I trust neither

Or maybe Iran was like "Yo homey, they crossed over before, and people know this, so let's like, go capture them when they didn't do anything wrong, and lie and say they were in our water, people will believe us because they did it before, and that obviously means they did it again, he did you get that new JayZ album? Shit is fly, get that gat, foo!"

Something like that.

Originally posted by BackFire
Or maybe Iran was like "Yo homey, they crossed over before, and people know this, so let's like, go capture them when they didn't do anything wrong, and lie and say they were in our water, people will believe us because they did it before, and that obviously means they did it again, he did you get that new JayZ album? Shit is fly, get that gat, foo!"

Something like that.

I'm not going to make any assumptions about what the hell the end of that quote implies...

Originally posted by ragesRemorse
im just curious, what has the iranian Government done that makes their word anymore credible than the british's?

Why do you side so quickly with a Government that is so against democracy, and the western culture?

Western culture is not by default. It is not universaly ''right'', which means that not everyone wants ''american democracy'', or western culture. Fact.

What makes Iranians more credible? Nothing.
But they are far more honest - they are pretty open about their intentions, about their prejudices and about their hate. Which is their downfall.

What they should learn from the west is to hide their true intentions and achieve their goals under the false pretence.

Iranian people are not stupid. They don't need Americans and British to tell them what their life is under allahatoyha's and mullahs. Iranians, just like Iraqi's should be left to revolt their governments and sort their own crap out - by themselves. Without anyone else ''peacekeeping'' and invading.