AOTC Kenobi vs. ANH Kenobi

Started by Count Makashi4 pages
Originally posted by vader11
I think ROTS Obi>ANH>AOTC>TPM

I completely agree.

Originally posted by Count Makashi
I completely agree.
Thanks 🙂
But that's just my oppinion 😄

Mine to.

****, I typed up responses to most of your stuff and then accidentally hit the x by the tab box **** I'm pissed oh well here goes again:

How does it not matter? He's no Sidious in the least. And you'll have to forgive me for laughing that you think he Alec Guiness moved faster than Ewan did...thats ridiculous. Gideon said that Jolly Jim was the one who said that Vader was toying with Ben to "wear him down" before killing him, so no, i don't think he was as strong as Vader. And can be as powerful as he wants, it doesn't alter the fact that he was/is slower than AOTC OB1. And it said that OB1 started to perfect form 3 after he saw the holes and flaws in QGJ's form and how easily he was killed. So, if he started perfecting it at the end of TPM, he's had 10 years to learn how to utilize it. I doubt there was a significant increase in his saber technique in the three years between AOTC and ROTS, granted there would be some, but nothing monumental, meaning that OB1 is already extremely proficient with his form. And being in practice makes a huge difference in fighting.

Never said he was a Sidious, did I? He wasn't slower, watch the Cabtina scene again. In AOTC he was only a Soresu Practitioner, by ROTS he was THE Soresu master. There was a lot of increase during those 3 years.
And do you have proof that ANH Ben is even 60% of Sidious in any incarnation? Or are you just making an assumption? Explain how you wouldn't decrease n skill if you hadn't practiced in 20 years. Even still, Ben isn't Vader and he isn't Sidious. I'm quite sure that being the supreme chancellor and being able to come and go as you please gives you time to practice here and there. And I know being the leaders of the Empire, you can do and afford any and everything needed to stay on point with your saber skills.

Vader = 80% of Sidious. Old Ben roughly = Vader. Palpatine was very busy during the Clone Wars and had no time for practice, but I could say the same thng about Kenobi, that he had as much time as he wanted to practice. I never said Palpatine didn't practice between ROTS and ROTJ, I just said he didn't during the PT and didn't decrease any.

With what? A remote droid? That in no way compares to what would be at an active Jedi temple member's disposal.

He could easily train with a remote droid if he wasn't trying to increase and just stay at an even level. He could also train alone with nothing like Barriss did in the Medstar Duology, just pratice is moves and his speed and such.

Two old grimy pirates are in no way comparable to an AOTC OB1 in speed, power, or fighting prowess. I already mentioned the keeping up with Vader. Vader toyed with everyone in the OT. No reason to assume that he didn't toy with Ben as well.

Who ways they were were old and being dirty doesn't make you weak or slow. Who says they were not strong pirates, most pirates aren't weak and being as wanted as they were those pirates were probably pretty strong. I never said theyw ere fatser than AOTC kenobi just that when Old Ben took them out he moved faster than AOTC Kenobi ever does. Proof that Vader toyed with Ben? There's a lot of reason for him not to, Kenobi beat him last time, Vader hates Ben, Vader wouldn't want to take chances after last time and Vader was even breathing hard in their duel so he can't have been toying with him.
I thought Gideon provided it, but he said JJ did, so it'd be up to him provide it again, although I'm sure his bias in this debate would hinder him from doing so. And no, just because he lost to Vader doesn't mean he can beat his younger self. What kind of sense does that make? If he could have beaten Vader, he would have. He wouldn't have given up. No one searches for a fight just to commit suicide.

You brought it up, so you provide proof or withdraw your statement. Never said he could have beaten Vader, look again at what I said:
"if Old Ben is even close to Vader then he should definitely be able to beat young Kenobi." That's what I said.

Cause when I hear people mention that Ben is still a powerful warrior, it's usually followed up with "the strongest good guy around" which wouldn't include Yoda. So i was just just saying he was only considered to be that strong because we didn't have Yoda yet to compare him to.

Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me, Old Ben is stronegr than Yoda by ANH because in the ANH AC, when we DO know about Yoda, GL says that Ben is the strongest good guy at that time, but that's probably because Yoda has decreased a lot because hie life is almost over, you know the last 20 years of a 900 old person's life is like the last 2 years of a normal persons life who died of old age.
Moving your forearms a distance of less than a meter is completely different that engaging in a full out battle with a powerful Jedi.

It doesn't matter, Old Ben still moves his forearms faster than AOTC Kenobi ever does when fighting droids or anything.
Ben, by his own admission, was too old to even go out and help Leia by himself. His younger counterpart was going out on all kinds of missions by himself and was successful. That has to tell you something.

"You must learn the ways of the Force if you're to come with me to Alderaan." So you're saying that Ben was to old to fly to Alderaan and hand Bail organa a droid? Lol, yeah right, Ben was just trying to get Luke to become a Jedi because he knew that Luke was the Jedi's only hope.
Are you fcuking kidding me?! Its harder to swing a weightless beam of concentrated energy that cuts through anything, than it is to swing a heavy chain that is attached to you over a huge slug's corpulent neck while having to hop over his craftmatic bed? PLEASE! And post a still of them having their weapons drawn. You forget that it was two of them in a bar when Jabba was surrounded by his faithfuls and confidants in HIS area...advantage Ben there. More props go to Leia there.

Who ever said the chain was heavy and she didn't swing it, she merely flipped it over Jabba's head, no swinging involved. And she jumped off his bed before she flipped the chain over his head. Most of Jabba's guards were outside fighting Luke, the only ones inside were otehr crime lords who wanted him dead anyways plus they were distracted and so was Jabba and it was dark.

And look here: http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=swtcg/cardlist/anewhope&tablefilter=Obi-Wan%20kenobi%20(E)

Ludicrous to assume. If i remember correctly, and i could be wrong, you were arguing for Dooku in the Dooku vs Vader thread, right? And everyone's point there was "you have to go by the highest form of canon which is the movie, in which he moved like a slow piece of shit." And that same logic and reasoning applies to Ben. I said you could even provide any EU feats to your argument which you haven't done. So choreography aside, Ben is slow and thats all there is to it. To argue against that is too argue against canon.

Yes I was. That was what Sith'ari said, I never did, but it doesn't f*cking matter anyways, because the Cantina Scene is in the movie, is it not. You couldn't say the same for Ben ebcause he is wickedly fast in the movie during the Cantina scene. Okay, go by movies only for speed, then Ben is by far the fastest one in the OT and faster than AOTC Kenobi, too. Fine by me.
Prove he is quicker than he was in AOTC. No he wouldn't be more experienced (in sabers at least) if he was out of practice. That's what experience is. Thugs =/= AOTC OB1. Strong doesn't mean shit here -- AOTC OB1 was strong too.

He still has more expeirence, you can't lose experience. Yes, AOTC kenobi would beat those thugs but not nearly as quickly. If you want proof watch the Cantina scene, do I have to get the exact time of the scene for you? AOTC Kenobi is strong but not strong as hell.

I would say AOTC OB1 spinning around and cutting off a dangerous bounty hunter's hand (even more quickly than old Ben's feat) is more impressive than being face to face with a guy and cutting his arm off. Also he pulled it out slow enough for the bartender to notice what was going on and scream, "no blasters, no blasters!" and duck. In AOTC no one had time to say shit, he spun and her arm was gone. Which is more impressive? That's right, AOTC...

True, he does that fast, but he was already ready for that, in ANH he was facing the bar to buy Evazan a drink when he turned back towards Evasan and it wasn't quite as quick in AOTC, either. The bartender yelled it very quickly and it doesn't take very long to duck, plus he yeleld and ducked as it was going on not before or anything. By the time he was to the ground the fight was over. No one wanted to say shit in AOTC. ANH is more impressive, you need to watch it again to refresh your memory.

I'll try to respond to this when i get out of class tonight, or tomorrow. Got a shitload of homework and my daughter's sick with an ear infection, so i don't have the time to type out a long ass rebuttal. But i will reply to you, fair enough?

Sure, take your time. I used to get ear infections all the time when I was younger, they suck, hope your daughter gets well soon.

Thanks, Im at work right now and had a few minutes, but this one will take slightly longer to type out, so i will get back to it...

Oh, you are pretty young to have a daughter...

I'm almost 27. And I have a 6 1/2 year old son. How is 26 young out of curiostiy? (being that shes only 1)

So you have a son when you are 20? That's definitely young!
Many people still havn't got marry when they are above 25...

And some are when they turn 18.

20 is a little young, not that young... some people do have children at the age of 16 or 17 but that is to young, imho you should be at least a responsible 20 to have a child.

Yeah, 20s pretty young, but not crazy young. My eldest brother's 20 and he has a 2 year old daughter.

"Old" Ben loses

My mom had me, when she was 19 and she was always responsible, at least thats what she tels me, i just hope she didnt smoke while she was pregnant.

My mom was 32. When she had my brother she was 29. My mom's mom had her oldest child at 23 and her youngest at 33, my dad's mom had him at 22 and he was her first, her last was at 34. So yeah, my post has no point except one:

"Old" Ben loses

Wow, he's old, that doesn't mean he loses, look at Yoda, he was 877 years old in ROTS and he'd have pwnd 38 year old Kenobi, or 35 year old AOTC Kenobi or just about anyone younger than he is during his life time, except Sidious. Wow, so he's old, great point. 🙄

20 is young yes, but i had also made the decision to join the Army to support him. Unlike a lot of deadbeat dads, I stuck around despite not being married (at the time) and did everything i had to do to make sure he was taken care of, i.e. work two jobs, pick up odd jobs while my now wife couldn't work. Its better than all these teenage kids that still live at home and expect their parents to raise their kids so they don't lose the last part of their childhood. But he was planned cause i wanted to ensure that I could always be young enough to play with him and do allot of things that dads who had kids when they were 20 can't do. That and I'll always be young enough to be "hip" to him. 😛

The world record for youngest pregnant girl is 9 years old...><

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Medina

No, it's five years old.

Oh, I don't know about that...I think the 9-year-old record is an old record...