Spiderman's little problem

Started by DigiMark0073 pages

...yeah, it's not like he's insanely more uber or something.

Besides, Pete outgrew half his rogues gallery years ago, even pre-upgrades. Green Goblin, for example, one of his most iconic villians, hasn't been an actual threat to Pete in a fight since the 70's. He's just a threat to Pete's loved ones and life.

So it's refreshing....he really hasn't had many of his "classic" rogues for a while, and it's high time he ditched a few of them.

Originally posted by Black Adam
Grimm hates everything. He's funny like that.

2guns Jumpy

No, I just hated how he had to get saved by those kids

Originally posted by willRules
What we need is that now Brock is gonna be Venom again, but Macgargan should go back to being scorpion but because of his time with the symbiote he is a like a powered up version and should pwn spidey a couple of times ✅

Scorpion should be pwning Spidey anyway 😐

He's got most of spidey's powers, plus that tail

Originally posted by Grimm22
Scorpion should be pwning Spidey anyway 😐

He's got most of spidey's powers, plus that tail

😕

You mean, minus webs and spider-sense, right? And now, persumably, a bit lower in strength. The SS is really a difference maker, because with it he's consistently faster than most of his rogues. Scorpion's a prime example of what I'm talking about. He hasn't taken Pete through his paces without a plot device since at least the mid 80's, maybe earlier.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
😕

You mean, minus webs and spider-sense, right? And now, persumably, a bit lower in strength. The SS is really a difference maker, because with it he's consistently faster than most of his rogues. Scorpion's a prime example of what I'm talking about. He hasn't taken Pete through his paces without a plot device since at least the mid 80's, maybe earlier.

Yeah 😛

Still though, I would like to see Scorpion fighting him on a more even playing field

Originally posted by H. S. 6
40s to 50s? He's like, 80 in that book.

nah, it was implied that he was 30 something when what happened to MJ happened....

and that was 20 something years after, so if anything he was in his 60s...

how would JJJ been alive if Pete was in his 80s?

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
nah, it was implied that he was 30 something when what happened to MJ happened....

and that was 20 something years after, so if anything he was in his 60s...

how would JJJ been alive if Pete was in his 80s?

I got mixed up. I'm thinking of Peter as Jameson.

Jameson was in his 80's, at the very least.

Originally posted by H. S. 6
I got mixed up. I'm thinking of Peter as Jameson.

Jameson was in his 80's, at the very least.

yeah...😕

so pete was in his 40s-50s.....

Originally posted by NiñoAraña
yeah...😕

so pete was in his 40s-50s.....

Yeah, I'd put him somewhere around 55 to 60.

If we figure Jameson was 45 (at the youngest) when Peter started working for the Daily Bugle, and he's around 85 in Reign, then Pete would be around 55.