It's not postponing anything. I just haven't gotten around to closing discussion. I never want to cut people short if there's more to say, but if it's just goober and cresh over the next few days, I won't have a problem saying "ok, you guys have had your say, let's move on." That said, I'm still not in any rush. But you can lay to rest any worries about someone philibustering a decision simply by talking more.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Actually its 23 voting for, 16 voting against with a 7 person lead.For: (23)
Leonidas, Creshosk, batdude123, Battlehammer, Kris Blaze, Ha-Son, Blanket, Wagstaff, Badabing, Philosophia, -Pr-, The Nuul, xJLxKing, Nihlist, iceman24567, Blair Wind, ~The Wickerman~, gobstakid777, Juk3n, kgkg, Meissier 83, Digi, -K-M-Against: (16)
SuperiorTech, Rage.Of.Olympus, Enyalus, Original Smurph, Newjak, Endless Mike, Harbringer, KuRuPT Thanosi , Slaneesh, 1d369, starlock, Naija Boy, ExodusCloak, psycho gundam DarthgooberBut thanks for playing.
#$%^ those 7 people though right? The minority should win, as those 7 people don't count for anything right?
You silly responses while trying to moderate the thread are amusing. First, show me where I said those 7 votes shouldn't count? I never said any such thing. Second, your attempt at demeaning was rather amusing.. I was off by one vote and you say thanks for playing... hahaha lol. If you look throughout this thread you will see it being said by Digi and others that there needs to be a overwhelming/clear majority. Now why isn't that same criteria being used here for Batman? I see no overwhelming majority in the least. I see 16 people voting against something and nothing even close to double that for. You have it being that close with people "changing their votes" Changes their votes because of arguments and it being genuine is one thing. Getting PM's saying change your vote and I'll vote this way or that way is another. That taints the whole process and we still see a relatively close score of 23/16. By no means does that seem overwhelming in the least. What now that Digi "changed" his mind and wants Bats moved that no longer applies.. Ummm okay
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Getting PM's saying change your vote and I'll vote this way or that way is another. That taints the whole process and we still see a relatively close score of 23/16. By no means does that seem overwhelming in the least. What now that Digi "changed" his mind and wants Bats moved that no longer applies.. Ummm okay
I seeeee......
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You silly responses while trying to moderate the thread are amusing. First, show me where I said those 7 votes shouldn't count? I never said any such thing. Second, your attempt at demeaning was rather amusing.. I was off by one vote and you say thanks for playing... hahaha lol. If you look throughout this thread you will see it being said by Digi and others that there needs to be a overwhelming/clear majority. Now why isn't that same criteria being used here for Batman? I see no overwhelming majority in the least. I see 16 people voting against something and nothing even close to double that for. You have it being that close with people "changing their votes" Changes their votes because of arguments and it being genuine is one thing. Getting PM's saying change your vote and I'll vote this way or that way is another. That taints the whole process and we still see a relatively close score of 23/16. By no means does that seem overwhelming in the least. What now that Digi "changed" his mind and wants Bats moved that no longer applies.. Ummm okay
Shut up. baka
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiReported for trolling.
You silly responses while trying to moderate the thread are amusing. First, show me where I said those 7 votes shouldn't count? I never said any such thing. Second, your attempt at demeaning was rather amusing.. I was off by one vote and you say thanks for playing... hahaha lol. If you look throughout this thread you will see it being said by Digi and others that there needs to be a overwhelming/clear majority. Now why isn't that same criteria being used here for Batman? I see no overwhelming majority in the least. I see 16 people voting against something and nothing even close to double that for. You have it being that close with people "changing their votes" Changes their votes because of arguments and it being genuine is one thing. Getting PM's saying change your vote and I'll vote this way or that way is another. That taints the whole process and we still see a relatively close score of 23/16. By no means does that seem overwhelming in the least. What now that Digi "changed" his mind and wants Bats moved that no longer applies.. Ummm okay
When did I ever cite 2/1 as a necessary criteria for a passing vote? I mentioned the number not long ago, but it was only because we had that ratio for a particular vote. Try not to put words in my mouth KT.
Also, we'll remove Batman from the list entirely if this can't remain civil. For a list that is intended as a rough gauge of power to help newer members determine power levels, all of you are taking this way too seriously. If you disagree with a placement, make your own list. Because the moment I start, say, fielding angry PMs because a vote does or doesn't pass because of a few votes is the moment where that person loses their voting rights.
Further bickering will result in warnings. Keep it on topic or don't post.
Originally posted by xJLxKing
Digi, I agree. I think you should remove Batman from the list. Yeah, I do believe he should be moved up, but if you do that, then there are a few characters that are considered his peers. If he is to be moved, then his peers should be too.
Characters can and have been removed because discussion can't be kept civil. However, it has nothing to do with Batman's placement, nor the placement of his peers. So don't lobby to get him removed because you think you see a future problem with the list. Frankly, that's the last of my concerns, and your post seems less concerned with my warning for civility than it does for using the "remove him" suggestion to further your opinions about the list. The list will change according to forum votes, as it always has.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiReported for trolling and for spamming.
haha. how was my post trolling? Cres.. I got news for you.. your not a mod and stop trying to act like one. There was no trolling there and actually you should get a warning for false reporting and abusing the function
So digi, is batman going to be moved? I don't want to be a pest about it but...
Originally posted by Battlehammerlol, no, just curious if a decision was made one way or the other. I might have missed it.
it almost dinner time and your hungry? 😛
Originally posted by Phantom Zone
To be quite honest I think this has got out of hand I cant even be bothered to care.
Originally posted by Digi
When did I ever cite 2/1 as a necessary criteria for a passing vote? I mentioned the number not long ago, but it was only because we had that ratio for a particular vote. Try not to put words in my mouth KT.Also, we'll remove Batman from the list entirely if this can't remain civil. For a list that is intended as a rough gauge of power to help newer members determine power levels, all of you are taking this way too seriously. If you disagree with a placement, make your own list. Because the moment I start, say, fielding angry PMs because a vote does or doesn't pass because of a few votes is the moment where that person loses their voting rights.
Further bickering will result in warnings. Keep it on topic or don't post.
Ummm Digi.. how am I trying to put words in your mouth? You just said you referenced that number not long ago but it was for a different vote. So, how am I putting words in your mouth? What I said, and what you & others have made very clear, by using words like... overwhelming/clear majority/ two thirds has even been referenced. Those aren't me putting those words anywhere but a criteria that you and others have said throughout the thread. Seems to me those words no longer apply when Batman is up for a vote..