Originally posted by Phantom ZoneKeep in mind if you feel other characters should be bumped how your actions on the batman vote would reflect on you.
haha you got that from the wire. I was gonna start using that, you beat me to it. Sheeeeiit.I dunno man Bats standard gear. I mean his utility belt gear really isn't that good, and he rarely uses his Batmobile in a fight, dont see that as a reason to bump him to low-meta. He might have gear to help tangle with low-meta, doesnt neccesarily make him low-meta. Hell I think hes taken down some fully fledged metas, does that make him meta...nope.
Personally I don't care about the "matching feat for feat" thing. Since this isn't really about "feats" but the power output since we're suppoesed to assume that characters are operating to their full capacity, anyway and some feats might be there simply for the sake of the plot. Like How captain aamerica once bounced his shield off of some bricks and later throws it right through something made of metal. Not really consistant, as its behavior is that which the writer needs it to do for the plot.
Does it have a sharp cutting edge, in which case it should have embeded rather than bouncing off the brick wall, or does it have a dull edge to allow it to do that in which case it shouldn't cut metal apart?
Originally posted by Phantom ZoneHe uses skill to dynamically change the physical properties of something that's physical structure can't be altered?
Cresh yes its pretty consistent. I always thought it was a blunt edge, Cap uses skill to do stuff like that.Dont know why youre facepalming me you already said something stupid and im just trying to be polite.
Maybe Cap can use his skill to remove the adamantium from Wolverine's skeleton since his skill allows him to change physical properties of stuff. 🙄
"I don't know what you're talking about, but you're probably wrong." Is facepalm worthy methinks.
Originally posted by batdude123
You're being difficult just to be difficult.Sheeeeiit, I forgot I was talking to the #1 Batman expert on the boards. 😂
You expressed your opinion on the matter by voting "no." The current vote is 23 for, and 16 against. End of discussion. How the f*ck is that me promoting an agenda? facepalm
Once again, it's pretty f*ckin arrogant for one guy to try and stall the voting process, when the whole thing has already been discussed for the past 2 weeks, just because he doesn't like Batman being voted up. It's like nobody else even matters.
I never pretended to be the #1 Batman expert.
This is a discussion thread, not a "just voting" thread. I'm free to talk about the vote at hand for as long as it's going. I know you'd rather people who are voting "no" just say it without making actual points about it but that's not how I roll. Are you asking for decision to be made by a slimmer margin than we've allowed in the past? And that's a real question. Like I said I've always been under the impression that we needed a more decisive vote to bump someone, but you can correct me if I'm wrong because it's very possible that we've been bumping people by margins like this and I was just unaware of it.
I can't stall anything because I'm not the one who blows the whistle, Digi is. If he's not calling an end to the debate then he's either not satisfied with the vote or he thinks that people like Newjack and myself are bringing up valid points. If you really want me to stop before Digi ends it, try addressing the points I'm bringing up rather than dodging them.
Originally posted by darthgoober
I'm free to talk about the vote at hand for as long as it's going.
Originally posted by darthgoober
And as long as I'm talking about it the vote is sstill open and a decision can't be reached against my point of veiw even though the majority disagree with me. And in this way, I get my way.
noteFiiiilibusteriiiiingnote
Originally posted by darthgoober
No I'm not.I never pretended to be the #1 Batman expert.
This is a discussion thread, not a "just voting" thread. I'm free to talk about the vote at hand for as long as it's going. I know you'd rather people who are voting "no" just say it without making actual points about it but that's not how I roll. Are you asking for decision to be made by a slimmer margin than we've allowed in the past? And that's a real question. Like I said [b]I've
always been under the impression that we needed a more decisive vote to bump someone, but you can correct me if I'm wrong because it's very possible that we've been bumping people by margins like this and I was just unaware of it.I can't stall anything because I'm not the one who blows the whistle, Digi is. If he's not calling an end to the debate then he's either not satisfied with the vote or he thinks that people like Newjack and myself are bringing up valid points. If you really want me to stop before Digi ends it, try addressing the points I'm bringing up rather than dodging them. [/B]
I'm completely fine with people expressing their opinions on why they think Batman should stay at street level. That's never been what the issue is. The issue that I have a problem with is the idea of Batman being kept at street level until BP and Cap are voted on just because that's how you want it.
It demeans the other voters, and it would basically be like ignoring the past couple of weeks completely. 😬
This isn't a package deal. BP and Cap are not being voted on right now. They'll both have their chance to be voted up as soon as the thread reopens.