Originally posted by Battlehammer
It negates ones ability to heal, not there other powers. Not sure what the problem is, it extremely dangerous to uses, which is why it stays hidden and not used untill certainly writers completely ignored it. It no more absurd then DP immortality.
How is "You're cursed with immortality.", anywhere near as absurd as Daken's third claw being able to negate powers for no justifiable reason?
Originally posted by Battlehammer
It one ability to negate heal thats it. Yes I want the character to retain the ability that was two arcs in the making. So it ok to simply ignore powers now? Whats annoying is that it not like he uses much if at all, which is why they easily could of had him using his two claws instead, but of course how rediculous of me to assume a writer would actually read up on a character he going to uses in his issue........
Two arcs in the making, so if we assume he's been in more then four arcs, and only two contained that power...then it's the minority isn't it? They're working with the character, it's still new. If we stuck with originals, Superman wouldn't even be able to fly.
What makes you so arrogant as to think Bendis didn't read up on Daken? Maybe he did and just decided it wasn't something he agreed with? You don't hear Daniel Way complaining.
Stop assuming you know more about Marvel and that these writers somehow miss things just because they don't include them.
Daniel Way isn't writing Deadpool how I'd like him to. It doesn't mean he hasn't read The Circle Chase. It means he probably has and just doesn't want to write him like that.
Originally posted by Battlehammer
You missed my point. It annoying that a character has theses astablish abilities and currently still show them and his run, but then randomly his abilities are completely ignore in a cross over and in another on going and is shown to be nothing but a poor mans Logan.You missed my point. I am not speaking of his current run or dark avengers. I am talking about dark x-men cross over, new avenger cross over and sinster spiderman. Each of which his pheramones was ignore, his magical claws (which they could have left sheathed and his his character, replaced with a brainless rage riod individual.
I never saw him as a poor man's Wolverine or a roidrage individual at all, to be honest.
I thought he was good in Dark X-Men.
Sure, it doesn't make the most sense. I see what you're saying. You're saying that if they didn't wanna use the claw, they didn't have to and they could have left it hidden. However, they exposed it and just ignored the ability? Yes, that'd probably be a bit of a pisser.
However, if that's JUST appearances or cameos, why worry? The established character will always win through in the end.
-AC
