Can you handle the Truth?

Started by chickenlover98432 pages

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I don't believe that the Scriptures state that "men are better than women."

[B]Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus
.

This Scripture contradicts your statement. [/B]

wrong, that is why you fail

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
That evolutionary and big bang theory violate the scientific method/laws of scientific approach towards arriving at fact.

I don’t believe you know enough to make such a statement.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
If I were talking about Buddha or Mohammed would you accuse me of bigotry?

Yes.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Might? You mean you don't know (just kidding pal)? What is the origin of the forces of nature?

“I don’t know” is the beginning of knowledge. The origin of the forces of nature is beyond our current understanding.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What caused the big bang?

Instability.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why not?

You would have to know something about science to understand.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
But then I would be just as uninformed/confused about how the forces of nature came into existence, what caused the big bang, where atoms originated, etc. as every scientist on the planet is. But since I believe the Scriptural account relative to these questions, I am more informed and assured of how all of these events transpired than ever before.

Your ignorance is bountiful.

Ignorance is bliss.

Comic microwave background radiations is actually a product of the first ions gaining their electrons because the universe had cooled enough for the bonding to occur. At this moment, the universe turned on like a light and it must of been a brilliant moment.

This is the big bang that we talk about. It really occurred hundreds of thousands of years after the initial expansion from the origin singularity.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Comic microwave background radiations is actually a product of the first ions gaining their electrons because the universe had cooled enough for the bonding to occur. At this moment, the universe turned on like a light and it must of been a brilliant moment.

This is the big bang that we talk about. It really occurred hundreds of thousands of years after the initial expansion from the origin singularity.

Now were is THAT in the bible?

"Let there be light," I'd imagine.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Try not to become flustered. You persist in putting the cart before the horse. Where did the star originate from?
do you even read othr peoplespost before saying theyare wrong? we've stated fifty millions times that stars were created when the big bang occured. and the bible definately does not suppr equalness as christany is known for it's stance on anything or anyone that believes different from them which is basically this "because you dont believe what i believe i'm going to kill you" which is the main reason i oppose religion.

another note i was thinking about what a very wise man said about Adam and Eve and i relized the Tree of Life and Tree of Knowledge re basicaly them saying if you play dumb and follow orders you'll live, if you become intellegent and disobey you'll die

He was not a very wise man then, he couldn't even read properly. It's called the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Subtle, but kinda crucial difference.

well he is one of the world's leading physisits....must not know wuch about the bible

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Now were is THAT in the bible?

Seriously?

God separated the light from darkness=the universe came to life with light because electrons finally joined with ions to form atoms

It could be as simple as that. 😕 Since I believe God didn't have much of an active hand in evolution of the universe other than creating, at some point, a "matter" biased, I don't believe he did that stuff with an "action verb"...that stuff in the works since the universal nascence. God already planned that out and didn't have to do anything beyond introducing the origin singularity, IMO.

Edit-

Originally posted by Zeal Ex Nihilo
"Let there be light," I'd imagine.

Oops...looks like Feceman already thought of that.

Originally posted by queeq
He was not a very wise man then, he couldn't even read properly. It's called the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Subtle, but kinda crucial difference.

There are two trees.

The tree of life

and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

[/sundayschool]

so i was right there is a tree of knowledge *sticks tongue out at queeq* although i didn't have the full name

The Tree of Life is also in the Kaballa.

kaballa? is that a place or food?

Another belief.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Seriously?

God separated the light from darkness=the universe came to life with light because electrons finally joined with ions to form atoms

It could be as simple as that. 😕 Since I believe God didn't have much of an active hand in evolution of the universe other than creating, at some point, a "matter" biased, I don't believe he did that stuff with an "action verb"...that stuff in the works since the universal nascence. God already planned that out and didn't have to do anything beyond introducing the origin singularity, IMO.

Edit-

Oops...looks like Feceman already thought of that.

I respect your opinion, but why do you separate God from the universe? IMO there is no separation.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I respect your opinion, but why do you separate God from the universe? IMO there is no separation.

Because God is in another plane of existence. This existence is for his spirit children. There is a degree of separation between what you and I believe as the Creator and where we are physically.

Because God is in another plane of existence. This existence is for his spirit children. There is a degree of separation between what you and I believe as the Creator and where we are physically
ohh sounds like one of those rhetorical speeches of A.H just with different words, same idea though........sieg

Originally posted by anaconda
ohh sounds like one of those rhetorical speeches of A.H just with different words, same idea though........sieg

What is A.H.?

Adolf Hitler