Originally posted by Da Pittman
Here I will make it easy for you.Name: Casey Landreth
Born: Anchorage, Alaska
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Age: 36
Status: Married
Occupation: Graphic Designer/Web Developer
Education: UACT (Bachelors of Science)
Hobbies: Reading, Sci-Fi, Gamming, Darts, Art
History: Navy Veteran
Don't you think that that is TMI?
Originally posted by Devil King
And that's all it really comes down to; assuming that you have something everyone else wants. I have never heard a better analogy than god's favor being equal to the chance of winning the lottery. I'm glad you embrace it so obviously and willingly.
I am not assuming, I'm in faith.
Originally posted by Da Pittman
So by your view if I have not traveled in a car going over 200mph, it is faith that a car can travel over 200mph? Since I have not taken calculus then it would be faith that it works? Since I have not raised a cow it would be faith that a cow can grow? Do you realize how ludicrous that view is?So if you didn’t translate the Bible from its original language to the KJV then it would be faith that it was done right? Since you didn’t interview Jesus is it faith that he didn’t lie and that he was nuts?
So with your tire track example it is not deductive reasoning that you are using but faith because you didn’t test the tire tracks to make sure they were authentic and not a reproduction or a naturally occurring event? So you have faith that the Earth revolves around the Sun? You have faith that if you jump off a building you will fall? You have faith that if you drink Draino that you will die? So when you mail something to someone you have faith that it is not all being sent to some guy in his basement? You have faith that airplanes can fly?
I was simply trying to show you the same rationale that you employ towards me (that's all) to see if you could empathize with me.
Originally posted by Da Pittman
So by your view if I have not traveled in a car going over 200mph, it is faith that a car can travel over 200mph? Since I have not taken calculus then it would be faith that it works? Since I have not raised a cow it would be faith that a cow can grow? Do you realize how ludicrous that view is?So if you didn’t translate the Bible from its original language to the KJV then it would be faith that it was done right? Since you didn’t interview Jesus is it faith that he didn’t lie and that he was nuts?
So with your tire track example it is not deductive reasoning that you are using but faith because you didn’t test the tire tracks to make sure they were authentic and not a reproduction or a naturally occurring event? So you have faith that the Earth revolves around the Sun? You have faith that if you jump off a building you will fall? You have faith that if you drink Draino that you will die? So when you mail something to someone you have faith that it is not all being sent to some guy in his basement? You have faith that airplanes can fly?
Originally posted by King Kandy
Um no, there's a reason that it hasn't been excepted. Complexity is a bad argument, and ID can't be tested because it works off of bad arguments... All of it's evidence is a matter of interpretation.Of course, only a total idiot would think that evolution if it was true, would "Disprove" God. Because it wouldn't, and I don't know where you got the idea it would from.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I never said that evolution would disprove anything. Here is what I said:[QUOTE=9227612]Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
How can biased evolutionists be trusted? They work off of the assumption that evolution is true. They do not use the scientific method objectively, they are bent on disproving the existence of God.
I simply stated that evolutionists are determined to disprove God. I did not say that evolution would or was capable of disproving God .[/QUOTE]
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive[/B]
I simply stated that evolutionists are determined to disprove God. [B]I did not say that evolution would or was capable of disproving God .
For starters, where do you think scientists get the "assumption" that the theory of evolution is sound?
Furthermore, the goal of the theory of evolution is not to disprove a god.
I do recall recommending that you look up what a scientific theory is. It is apparent that you have yet to comprehend the definition. By the way, this will help out with the first question.
Originally posted by dadudemonHow is this to much information, it is nothing more than common knowledge and nothing more that I have on my own personal site and everything that I have talked about on this site. What the hell do I have to worry about?
Don't you think that that is TMI?
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveWhy not answer my questions, what are you afraid of? What do you need to hide, or is everything you are saying complete and utter BS?
I do.
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveIt is not proof because as you have already stated that unless you do your own research and experiments then it is faith in the other, this is not proof so unless you show us your own experiments and research you can not claim any link or anything you say as proof. You can’t even say the Bible is proof until you show us your own personal research and experiments.
I can but it seems that you cannot (go back one or two pages for proof).
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveHow, please explain without trying to use a cope out and please stop trying to dodge my question. I have asked you straight forward countless of times now and I will not let it go until you explain your logic about this statement.
I was simply trying to show you the same rationale that you employ towards me (that's all) to see if you could empathize with me.
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveYou have stuck your foot in your mouth and I want to see you try and remove it.
Facts or research that you have not personally conducted or arrived at through the scientific method (this includes anything that you have read regardless if it is peer-reviewed or not).
Originally posted by Da Pittman
How is this to much information, it is nothing more than common knowledge and nothing more that I have on my own personal site and everything that I have talked about on this site. What the hell do I have to worry about? Why not answer my questions, what are you afraid of? What do you need to hide, or is everything you are saying complete and utter BS? It is not proof because as you have already stated that unless you do your own research and experiments then it is faith in the other, this is not proof so unless you show us your own experiments and research you can not claim any link or anything you say as proof. You can’t even say the Bible is proof until you show us your own personal research and experiments. How, please explain without trying to use a cope out and please stop trying to dodge my question. I have asked you straight forward countless of times now and I will not let it go until you explain your logic about this statement. You have stuck your foot in your mouth and I want to see you try and remove it.
Identity theft.
😱
Originally posted by AngryManateeFor starters, where do you think scientists get the "assumption" that the theory of evolution is sound?
Furthermore, the goal of the theory of evolution is not to disprove a god.
I do recall recommending that you look up what a scientific theory is. It is apparent that you have yet to comprehend the definition. By the way, this will help out with the first question.
They get the assumption from their bias.
Originally posted by Devil King
Faith is nothing but an absolute confidence in assumption.
Originally posted by Devil King
How so?
Do you want the truth?