Originally posted by Shakyamunison
When I ask you something like what is the difference between a hydrogen atom in a living cell and a rock, you disappear.
Really, I disappear? By that do you mean that I have failed to respond to your question. That is where you have lied (based on the facts and the situation). I responded to this particular question perhaps hours ago. Still in disbelief? Well, let me locate the "facts." Ah, here it is:
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Is this a trick question? There is no difference between a hydrogen atom in a living cell and one in a rock. What is your point?
I still luh ya bruh with Christian love, so no love lost between us (the Christian, platonic, non-romantic, love of course).
😄
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Really, I disappear? By that do you mean that I have failed to respond to your question. That is where you have lied (based on the facts and the situation). I responded to this particular question perhaps hours ago. Still in disbelief? Well, let me locate the "facts." Ah, here it is:I still luh ya bruh with Christian love, so no love lost between us (the Christian, platonic, non-romantic, love of course).
😄
That is not an answer to my question. That is a dodge.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That is not an answer to my question. That is a dodge.
No, that is the answer to your trick question, you just didn't expect me to get it, but I did. In fact, I said that there was no difference before you did.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Is this a trick question?(8:53am today) There is no difference between a hydrogen atom in a living cell and one in a rock.
What is your point?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I guess you will never answer my question, so I will answer it for you. (11:58am today) There is no difference between a hydrogen atom in a living or non-living thing.This is true for all elements, but elements do have reactions, they are not static. This is called chemistry. Chemistry works in living and non-living things in the same way. We can predict what is going to happen to a degree. However, how these simple building blocks go together under a variety of conditions is so vast, that we are still finding new arrangement (molecules or chemical compounds) today. This is a natural process that has been going on for billions of years. Human life evolved because there is no difference between living and non-living at the level of the sub-atomic. Life is a chemical byproduct of complex chaotic chemistry.
I responded to your question and it was the answer to your question. I just did not need to go in to detail (it does not take all that to answer that easy, simple question, which by the way, I answered three hours earlier)
😄
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, that is the answer to your trick question, you just didn't expect me to get it, but I did. In fact, I said that there was no difference [b]before you did.I responded to your question and it was the answer to your question. I just did not need to go in to detail (it does not take all that to answer that easy, simple question, which by the way, I answered three hours earlier)
😄 [/B]
OK, now do you see my point? Life can appear to come from non-living.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
OK, now do you see my point? Life can appear to come from non-living.
Sure, life can appear to come from something non-living, but that does not mean that it has.
However, there is are a number of features as it were that living things possess that non-living things do not. First, living things are both complex and organized. Second, living things grow and reproduce. Third, living things respond to stimuli. Fourth, living things acquire and use materials and energy. Finally, living things use DNA to store information.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Sure, life can [B]appear to come from something non-living, but that does not mean that it has.However, there is are a number of features as it were that living things possess that non-living things do not. First, living things are both complex and organized. Second, living things grow and reproduce. Third, living things respond to stimuli. Fourth, living things acquire and use materials and energy. Finally, living things use DNA to store information. [/B]
😆 But I thought your god made everything from nothing.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What kept the Big Crunch in motion?
External and Internal Forces
Gravity, according to the Theory, causes all matter to constrict and collapse to a common point. Eventually, there is too much energy for the Gravity to contain, so another Big Bang is caused.
Think of a Super Nova........A giant star fuels and burns energy, reaction afer reaction, for millenia. Gravity keeps the majority of energy from escaping, however, eventually the energy will be too much for the star to contain. The star will go nova causing a massive and destructive explosion. Eventually all those gasses will cool, and the star is either reduced to a white dwarf, becomes a black hole, or the debris forms other stars.
Also, if you look at Nature, you will not see any existance of "good or evil". Those are human constructs.
Life occurs, Life lives and dies. Life consumes life, and nature can be cruel and generous at the same time.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
😆 A god this is a "him" is a limited god.
It appears that you are at your wits end brother. Have you thrown in the towel so soon? We were just getting started. Don't go out like that. Don't let a believer win on a technicality, I wanted to knock you out. Just kidding!
😄
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It appears that you are at your wits end brother. Have you thrown in the towel so soon? We were just getting started. Don't go out like that. Don't let a believer win a technicality, I wanted to knock you out. Just kidding!😄
Well, say what you mean. All I have is what you write.
Originally posted by Goddess Kali
External and Internal ForcesGravity, according to the Theory, causes all matter to constrict and collapse to a common point. Eventually, there is too much energy for the Gravity to contain, so another Big Bang is caused.
Think of a [b]Super Nova....
....A giant star fuels and burns energy, reaction afer reaction, for millenia. Gravity keeps the majority of energy from escaping, however, eventually the energy will be too much for the star to contain. The star will go nova causing a massive and destructive explosion. Eventually all those gasses will cool, and the star is either reduced to a white dwarf, becomes a black hole, or the debris forms other stars.Also, if you look at Nature, you will not see any existance of "good or evil". Those are human constructs.
Life occurs, Life lives and dies. Life consumes life, and nature can be cruel and generous at the same time. [/B]
What or whom actuates or governs gravity?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
What or whom actuates or governs gravity?
No one and nothing governs gravity, it has always existed. Gravity is determined by the matter and energy it is promoted by. All forces are interdependent.
According to the First Law of Physics- Matter and Energy cannot be created or destroyed. That means it has always existed.
What part do you not understand, JIA ? 😬
Let me ask you...who or what created God ?
Let me answer that for you...we did. 😉
Originally posted by Goddess Kali
No one and nothing governs gravity, it has always existed. Gravity is determined by the matter and energy it is promoted by. All forces are interdependent.According to the [b]First Law of Physics
- Matter and Energy cannot be created or destroyed. That means it has always existed.What part do you not understand, JIA ? 😬
Let me ask you...who or what created God ?
Let me answer that for you...we did. 😉 [/B]
Gravity is a force that operates in the universe. As a result, gravity is subject to time and thus it is not eternal.
God is a Spirit; therefore, He is not bound by the laws of physics. Thus God has no creator. In addition, God exists outside of time so He is not bound by the laws of cause and effect.