Can you handle the Truth?

Started by Shakyamunison432 pages
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive

Gravity is a force that operates in the universe. As a result, gravity is subject to time and thus it is not eternal...

🤨 You don't know what you are talking about. Gravity is the product of the shape of space-time.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
🤨 You don't know what you are talking about. Gravity is the product of the shape of space-time.

Right! Hence it is not eternal. Space and time are characteristic of the physical universe (which according to scientists had a beginning). Scientists believe that the universe is expanding from the point it started from (this means that it had a beginning because it is obeying the laws of cause and effect).

😄

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Right! Hence it is not eternal. Space and time are characteristic of the physical universe (which according to scientists had a beginning). Scientists believe that the universe is expanding from the point it started from (this means that it had a beginning because it is obeying the laws of cause and effect).

😄

I believe that the big bang is just one of an endless number of big bangs and big crunches. Space-time is infinity.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I believe that the big bang is just one of an endless number of big bangs and big crunches. Space-time is infinity.
As do i......hey i just checked up here and noticed all the threads were by JIA...wtf?

Originally posted by TRH
As do i......hey i just checked up here and noticed all the threads were by JIA...wtf?

Ya, all of mine are in page two hell. 😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Ya, all of mine are in page two hell. 😆
I think i need to start posting here again....what happened to the muslims

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I believe that the big bang is just one of an endless number of big bangs and big crunches. Space-time is infinity.

Well, too bad the scientific community does not believe this.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Well, too bad the scientific community does not believe this.
to bad i am not in the scientific community

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Well, too bad the scientific community does not believe this.

The scientific community does not have an opinion one way or the other.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The scientific community does not have an opinion one way or the other.
I to be honest am not sure.....but i think Hawkins said what you said....didn't he?

Originally posted by TRH
I to be honest am not sure.....but i think Hawkins said what you said....didn't he?

I believe you are correct. 😄

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I believe you are correct. 😄
Good i was hoping i would not look like a fool again

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The scientific community does not have an opinion one way or the other.

Yes they do, but it is based on scientific theory. Your claims contradict their theories.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Yes they do, but it is based on scientific theory. Your claims contradict their theories.

What theories are you talking about? I would bet that you don't really know.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Yes they do, but it is based on scientific theory. Your claims contradict their theories.
Who's theory's,were are they,and don't give me some Christian website

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What theories are you talking about? I would bet that you don't really know.

The theory that the universe is expanding from the point it started from (this means that it had a beginning because it is obeying the laws of cause and effect).

from what I've read, the law of cause and effect is predominant in classical physics. What makes you think it prevails in an environment such as that of a theoretical singularity (i.e. our universe before the expansion)?

Edit: I would like to add that the big bang is not the only theory of universal creation, but since the others are not being brought into question, I wil refrain from discussing them.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
from what I've read, the law of cause and effect is predominant in classical physics. What makes you think it prevails in an environment such as that of a theoretical singularity (i.e. our universe before the expansion)?

Edit: I would like to add that the big bang is not the only theory of universal creation, but since the others are not being brought into question, I wil refrain from discussing them.

Trick question? There was no universe before the expansion. The moment of creation and expansion of the universe (i.e. the instance of the creation of the space-time continuum together with matter) began
simultaneous.

I don't recall stating that the Big Bang Theory "was" the only theory of universal creation.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive

Trick question? There was no universe before the expansion. The moment of creation and expansion of the universe (i.e. the instance of the creation of the space-time continuum together with matter) began
[B]simultaneous
.

I don't recall stating that the Big Bang Theory "was" the only theory of universal creation. [/B]

I never said that you said that there was only one theory. I only stated that information in order to indicate that it is not the only major theory out there, in case someone had chosen to point that out.

As for the "trick" question, there is no trick behind it. It just asks if you have an understanding of how the laws of physics are governed in a point of infinite mass and density. I have to answer to it, but I was wondering if you did since you seem to be asking so many probing questions about it towards the rest of us.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The theory that the universe is expanding from the point it started from (this means that it had a beginning because it is obeying the laws of cause and effect).

It only means that there was a time when all galaxies where together in one location. There may have been a singularity, but that could have lasted for eternity. No one can know.