Can you handle the Truth?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I never said that the apostle Paul was a homosexual. I just used his instance of self-discipline to illustrate the point that inappropriate desires or lusts must be brought under subjection to the will and Word of God. God's Word says one thing and your flesh says another. Which one are you going to listen to/obey? If I did everything that my unregenerate flesh wanted to do I would be a mess. But I don't allow my body or mind to run me. I tell my flesh when to get up in the morning, what to eat, what to look at (what not to look at), what to say (what not to say), etc. It is a battle, but I win everytime I aim to please my Heavenly Father and live for Him.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Just for the record,

Lets not blame Jesus for JIA.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How is saying that it's "disgusting" very different from saying it's "sinful"?

It's completely different. I think ranch dressing is disgusting, but I would never call it "sinful".

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Just for the record,

Lets not blame Jesus for JIA.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
It's completely different. I think ranch dressing is disgusting, but I would never call it "sinful".

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
It's completely different. I think ranch dressing is disgusting, but I would never call it "sinful".

An object cannot be sinful. A valid comparison would have to involve an action.

Originally posted by chickenlover98
who do you blame? i think its proof that evolution exists 😆

J

I

A......your adorable

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
An object cannot be sinful. A valid comparison would have to involve an action.

Okay: I think eating ranch dressing is disgusting.

My point is that "disgusting" and "sinful" are not synonymous. But you implied there were when you responded to chickenlover98.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Okay: I think eating ranch dressing is disgusting.

My point is that "disgusting" and "sinful" are not synonymous. But you implied there were when you responded to chickenlover98.

No I said they weren't really very different. Which they aren't, especially to an atheist.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No I said they weren't really very different. Which they aren't, especially to an atheist.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No I said they weren't really very different. Which they aren't, especially to an atheist.

They are different, and it doesn't matter "to who". Disgusting is subjective, but sin isn't; its a law in a given religion. Despite betting my last penny on ranch being disgusting, I can't prove it. I can prove that murder is a not allowed in Christianity, by showing the verse in the Bible.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
No, God does not allow sinners into Heaven. But God does love sinners so He has made a way for their sins to be wiped out so that they can go to Heaven.

[B]John 3:16
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son , that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.

Romans 5:8
But God demonstrates His own love toward us , in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

No, I don't hate anyone. I can disapprove of someone's behavior, conduct, lifestyle, mindset, and philosophy without hating that person. [/B]

So based on what JIA is saying, does this mean that gay animals (as in other than humans) are going to hell as well?

JIA has been indoctrinated, so his belief is just that. It doesn't make it true.

My answer would be No, we don't know what we will encounter after this life, yet it could or could not include such ideas, yet there is not a Hell, so that is NOT a possibility.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
JIA has been indoctrinated, so his belief is just that. It doesn't make it true.

My answer would be No, we don't know what we will encounter after this life, yet it could or could not include such ideas, yet there is not a Hell, so that is NOT a possibility.

You contradict yourself, Debbie.

You state that there is no absolute way of knowing what happens after death (which is true), state that the idea of Heaven and Hell could be a possibility on those grounds, but then state "there is no Hell".

Ladies and Gentlemen I might be in Heaven or Hell in a few days...I shall let you know my findings...

I won't be back on KMC till the weekend or so

Toodles.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Ladies and Gentlemen I might be in Heaven or Hell in a few days...I shall let you know my findings...

I won't be back on KMC till the weekend or so

Toodles.

What is going on with you? PM me if you wish.

Originally posted by Robtard
You contradict yourself, Debbie.

You state that there is no absolute way of knowing what happens after death (which is true), state that the idea of Heaven and Hell could be a possibility on those grounds, but then state "there is no Hell".

Originally posted by Deja~vu
Well according to the Hebrew scriptures which have now become Christian scriptures, the original meaning for hell is not a place of torment with fire and a devil. It is not a literal place is what I mean.

I agree that Hell in a place of torment, but it is a state of mind in this life time.

Yep and not a literal place.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
Yep and not a literal place.

But real none the less.