Can you handle the Truth?

Started by Da Pittman432 pages

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
says you because i just posted proof. why don't you address my proof (AKA THOSE ****ING TREES) and stop trolling.
How about you explain this oh great one of the sciences

Originally posted by AngryManatee
I'm just gonna leave this here YouTube video

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
those were all qoutes from your scientist that you have bn siding from your link........ now who is the dumbass? do we seriously expect to believe you, when you just showed a blatant hypocrisy of your believe of the person your are referencing and his believes of how the earth and climate would work. seriously you just question milankovitch so you have a better understanding then him and scientist today who support him.

his calculations are wrong. the atmosphere would be unsurviveable.

this was the most obvious pick and choose moment of his theory so far.

there is a word called critical thinking learned it in school it is what allowed me to make a similar argument in my previous post similar to what was just mention here with the ice sheets and the equator.. take a look at my last post. i am no scientist but you can see the similar thinking and common sense at play.

I am a scientist, and my calculations say that you are wrong.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
his calculations are wrong. the atmosphere would be unsurviveable.
I am a scientist, and my calculations say that you are wrong.

hysterical

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
his calculations are wrong. the atmosphere would be unsurviveable.
I am a scientist, and my calculations say that you are wrong.
And I can show you other calculations that say that you are, and your point being? So what makes you smarter than the "scientist" that agree with him?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
hysterical

hilarious....... do i get points for pointing out the obvious?

💃

okay everyone lets all focus on the tree fossil and then move on to the halo thinging machik

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
hilarious....... do i get points for pointing out the obvious?

💃

It was the "I am a scientist" part that killed me. But you got point too.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
I am a scientist, and my calculations say that you are wrong.
For a scientist you seem to have a hard time with numbers. 😉

I think this is what he is talking about:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100,000_year_problem

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
hilarious....... do i get points for pointing out the obvious?

💃

okay everyone lets all focus on the tree fossil and then move on to the halo thinging machik

Stop mocking me because you have no argument left because you CANNOT accomplish advanced mathematics. Actually look at the polonium halos instead of making parodies of my scientific terms that make you sound like an *******?

or will you mock me when i do scientific calculations and explain to you the basic premise of microscopy?

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
or will you mock me when i do scientific calculations and explain to you the basic premise of microscopy?

If you can't stay on the topic and debate people civilly, then maybe you should get away from the computer and go for a walk.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
It was the "I am a scientist" part that killed me. But you got point too.
hypocrisy?

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
hypocrisy?

You do not come across as a scientist.

ok i looked at your diagram i mean your "algebra".

i see what you are saying with the 2000 heat differentual, but i still stand by the ice sheets and fast rotation of the sun to help keep the earth cooler then the tempature you are mentioning oh and the equator/hemisphere . you are only taking the equation as proof but their are far more variable at play.

you have faster rotation of the earth
massive ice sheets to help reflect solar radiation
the oceans themselves that help block solar radiation when evaporated to form a umbrella effect...
and the most important one of all is solar dust and other such things that some scientist believe help the earth avoid such a direct concentration of solar energy when the earth reaches closer to the sun. it is believed the earth passess through a cosmic dust cloud.
oh yeah that is if the theory ion itself is accurate,

😛 friends 😛

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
ok i looked at your diagram i mean your "algebra".

I did all of the calculations in that diagram myself. that's "algebra" lol.

i see what you are saying with the 2000 heat differentual, but i still stand by the ice sheets and fast rotation of the sun to help keep the earth cooler then the tempature you are mentioning oh and the equator/hemisphere . you are only taking the equation as proof but their are far more variable at play.

indeed. It is rough, and not accounting for everything, but even if you cut the rough estimate of 2000 degrees in half you still have 1000 degree weather.

you have faster rotation of the earth
sure, all that friction is sure to help.

massive ice sheets to help reflect solar radiation
where does this idea come from? and what about all of the creatures [b] living on the ice sheets
? just the solar radiation enough is enough to kill them.

the oceans themselves that help block solar radiation when evaporated to form a umbrella effect...

but they only evaporate at 212 degrees, which, is unbearable temperature.

and the most important one of all is solar dust and other such things that some scientist believe help the earth avoid such a direct concentration of solar energy when the earth reaches closer to the sun. it is believed the earth passess through a cosmic dust cloud.
oh yeah that is if the theory ion itself is accurate,
that "cosmic dust cloud" is going to be incredibly hot in itself. You haven't proven anything, and even if you take the heat down to 1/10 of my estimate the climate is still unsurviveable.

for the moment, lets just assume that this makes it surviveable, how about all of these things when it gets to the other side of the spectrum? now its unbearably cold.

still not convinced why havent the majority of the world scientist accepted this believe of the young earth theory?

obviously we are missing something from this picture.
something is not being told...

OK, here are a couple of questions that I would like your answer too.

What about Snowball Earth?
What about hyperthermophiles?
What about Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis?

Both of these organisms live today is environments that would kill 95% of the life on this planet, so why wouldn't life that evolved during extreme temperatures resist even your temperatures if correct?

OK, looking at a bit more about your 100,000 year thing I still see nothing that comes even close to 2000 degree day.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Earths-Temperature-Brief-History-of-Recent-Change

Originally posted by Da Pittman
OK, here are a couple of questions that I would like your answer too.

What about Snowball Earth?
What about hyperthermophiles?
What about Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis?

Both of these organisms live today is environments that would kill 95% of the life on this planet, so why wouldn't life that evolved during extreme temperatures resist even your temperatures if correct?

OK, looking at a bit more about your 100,000 year thing I still see nothing that comes even close to 2000 degree day.
http://hubpages.com/hub/Earths-Temperature-Brief-History-of-Recent-Change

Ya, 22 deg. is not 2000 deg. 😈

Originally posted by AngryManatee
I'm just gonna leave this here YouTube video

Darwin in Doubt

YouTube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jfc55XAm2xs&feature=related

Cambrian Explosion Destroys Evolution!

YouTube video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=855L4WP26zA&feature=related