Can you handle the Truth?

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm going to ignore the ''immortal" and "need to eat" questions, as they're utterly retarded.

Bacteria and viruses change and adapt too. EG Becoming immune to one virus, doesn't make you immune to all viruses. HIV is a perfect example, it's ever mutating state is a major reason why a cure is not to be found, at least yet.

Then evolutionary process is false. If it ain't making me better then it ain't real and it don't exist. (Just felt like adding a little levity to the situation.)

Originally posted by Robtard
While the small details may be wrong, ie eye color, skin color, feather color, skin texture etc may be incorrect interpretations, the structure of the body and feathers are correct, unless you think the fossil remains which that drawing was based are fakes placed in the ground by someone to trick us.

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't you know that ancient men (well, men from 4-6 thousand years ago) used to keep those as pets.

Here's the proof!
YouTube video

Damn right. My family actually has one from our family heritage that is stuffed and preserved. His name was Stabby, rest his body thetans sadwalk

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Using your rationale, human organisms are many times more advanced than bacteria how come we are not yet resistant to death, disease, sickness, and old age? Why do we still need to eat? Shouldn't we be resistant to these inferior, lower-level dependencies? Shouldn't we be getting better with age instead of closer to the cemetary if evolutionary process is true?

http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/20questions19.html

again another retarted comment to somehow disclaim the validity.. i neither made any of those claims that you just referenced to me..

but ill play with you........ first off we modern humans do have a longer life span as well as a better immunities then our predecessors going back hundreds if not thousands of years. now comparing a virus and bacteria to humans and its ability to adapt within 40 or 50 decades is idiotic.. but lets supposed humans do evolve or change.. must sudden mutations are not benign to us humans but it does accurr look at down sydrome it is a mutation of an extra chromosome just an example of a sudden genetic change one of many..a less series and slower change in us humans is appearance look at skin tone height build features many are direct adaptation to our surroundings of our ascentors and the climate and the region they originated.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
Using your rationale, humans beings are the only things that are evolving and changing.

Ain't...ahem...I mean don't humans represent evolutionary processes' zenith in terms of superior workmanship? That is why I use human organisms in my posts so frequently. May as well start at the tippy top.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Then evolutionary process is false. If it ain't making me better then it ain't real and it don't exist. (Just felt like adding a little levity to the situation.)

Hahaha, you have to make a logical point before you can prove it false.

Evolution isn't "constantly becoming better" as you think, it's mutation and adaptation to a changing environment.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Ain't...ahem...I mean don't humans represent evolutionary processes' zenith in terms of superior workmanship? That is why I use human organisms in my posts so frequently. May as well start at the tippy top.

What exactly dictates "superior workmanship?"

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
again another retarted comment to somehow disclaim the validity.. i neither made any of those claims that you just referenced to me..

but ill play with you........ first off we modern humans do have a longer life span as well as a better immunities then our predecessors going back hundreds if not thousands of years. now comparing a virus and bacteria to humans and its ability to adapt within 40 or 50 decades is idiotic.. but lets supposed humans do evolve or change.. must sudden mutations are not benign to us humans but it does accurr look at down sydrome it is a mutation of an extra chromosome just an example of a sudden genetic change one of many..a less series and slower change in us humans is appearance look at skin tone height build features many are direct adaptation to our surroundings of our and ascentors and the climate and the region they originated.

Yeah, but it ain't...AHEM, scuze me...(I really got to stop using the word ain't) got a thing to do with evolutionary process.

Why do you believe that humans mutate? Who taught you this poppycock? Look, man...we ain't the X-Men.

Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
and the pose? and the claws? show me a picture of the fossil, not some artistic impression of the fossil.

Come on now, you're not JIA. We can tell how something walked/moved by it's bone structures and muscle placements, we can use modern animals as a blueprint.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
What exactly dictates "superior workmanship?"

I can guess his thinking here, "a bear eats fish, ergo the bear is superior in make!"

Never mind that the fish is far better adapted to it's environment than the bear is.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hahaha, you have to make a logical point before you can prove it false.

Evolution isn't "constantly becoming better" as you think, it's mutation and adaptation to a changing environment.

Then it's still false and ain't my cup of tea. Like I aforesaid: if it ain't making me better then I don't want it--cancel my subscription to evolutionary process posthaste.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Yeah, but it ain't...AHEM, scuze me...(I really got to stop using the word ain't) got a thing to do with evolutionary process.

Why do you believe that humans mutate? Who taught you this poppycock? Look, man...we ain't the X-Men.

apparently if humans dont mutate you need to tell that to ppl with down sydrome and their extra chromosome...

like i stated human mutations are not desireable or benign which does happen again go to school and learn.

Originally posted by AngryManatee
What exactly dictates "superior workmanship?"

Us-ins, you-ins, we-ins of the human persuasion.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Then it's still false and ain't my cup of tea. Like I aforesaid: if it ain't making me better then I don't want it--cancel my subscription to evolutionary process posthaste.

You have absolutely no understanding of Evolution. You're personally not going to evolve; in fact, it seems your devolving with the ever-increasing stupidity of your posts.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Us-ins, you-ins, we-ins of the human persuasion.

(You're swimming in the ocean) If a shark was charging you and a fish and it had every intention of eating you both, who would have the "superior" form of escape? You swimming with your hands and feet which are great for land use or the fish with it's fins and tail?

Edit: Please answer this, JIA.

Originally posted by Robtard
I can guess his thinking here, "a bear eats fish, ergo the bear is superior in make!"

Never mind that the fish is far better adapted to it's environment than the bear is.

Indeed, it seems like he's claiming that we are superior because of our mind, without taking into account that that's just our own way of adapting to our environment. As a matter of fact, through adaptation we've actually sacrificed some of our bipedal running efficiency by adapting our hip structure (having a larger hip structure then our ancestors) so we can fart out these big-headed babies.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Us-ins, you-ins, we-ins of the human persuasion.

That doesn't make sense. What exactly is it about humans that makes us superior in design to other animals?

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
apparently if humans dont mutate you need to tell that to ppl with down sydrome and their extra chromosome...

like i stated human mutations are not desireable or benign which does happen again go to school and learn.

I tawt I taw a putty tat. In the words of Elmer Fudd, "I tawt ebolutionary mutayshuns led to mpruuvements not deklines in organical devilopments. Yuh see downsindromedary is not evidentiary of ebolutionary prahses, it konstatutes da opposit of ebolution."

see we finally found your defense response when you have nothing to say.........

ok guys raise of hands who believes down syndrome is a physical sign of genetic mutation and an extra chromosome?

Originally posted by Robtard
Come on now, you're not JIA. We can tell how something walked/moved by it's bone structures and muscle placements, we can use modern animals as a blueprint.

Originally posted by Robtard
You have absolutely no understanding of Evolution. You're personally not going to evolve; in fact, it seems your devolving with the ever-increasing stupidity of your posts.

(You're swimming in the ocean) If a shark was charging you and a fish and it had every intention of eating you both, who would have the "superior" form of escape? You swimming with your hands and feet which are great for land use or the fish with it's fins and tail?

Edit: Please answer this, JIA.

Elmer Fudd told me to tell you that I plead the fifth.

😐