Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
and that's for the head pharmacist who counts and mixes pills in the back, not the ones in front who run the cash register. If you wanted the chemist in the back filling your prescriptions to only know addition, you'd be dead.
They sent you to Calculus so you could work a cash register? Why not just build a simpler machine?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Mutation does not lead to macroevolutionary change only perhaps variation within a kind.Similarity is not evidence of common ancestry. Comet cleanser and Windex are both composed of chemicals (similarity) but do not share the same ancestor (i.e. manufacturer).
Mutation leads to micro-evolution, given other factors are in order, so if you're going to continue to use the term "macroevolution", accept that macro-e is composed of many (little) steps of micro-e,
A fish doesn't just spawn offspring with legs and lungs capable of land use, as you think macro-e is.
Your analogy is idiotic.
Originally posted by Robtard
Mutation leads to micro-evolution, given other factors are in order, so if you're going to continue to use the term "macroevolution", accept that macro-e is composed of many (little) steps of micro-e, ie a fish doesn't just spawn offspring with legs and lungs capable of land use.Your analogy is idiotic.
assuming that vistigeal organs are signs of evolution..then that in itself supports the theory of evolution... humans with a tail or extra rib pair..and of course our appendex and has anyone ever considered the mud skipper as a possibility of a transitional form?
just saying,,,,,,
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaosfunny. the people who work the cash registers are nothing but peons. the boss, or the manager, whatever you want to call it, the one who mixes the pills in the back is the one who is the licensed pharmacist.
They sent you to Calculus so you could work a cash register? Why not just build a simpler machine?
Originally posted by Robtard
Well, that's a break away from "God made everything as is", now isn't it. Losing your faith in the written word of the Bible, eh?It certainly is possible, as they already was other species of humans and they died out not all that long ago, when looking at life on this planet as a whole, they were called Neanderthals, humans, but an entirely different species.
Though I'd imagine It'd take something like the colonization of a different world though space travel, where the alien environment provided the chance for certain mutations to flourish and this of course would require more time than can logically be tracked.
God did create everything as is but I believe that He also created mechanisms that allow for expanded variation within a kind.
I don’t believe that Neanderthals have been proven to exist.
Time is not a mechanism for macroevolution, a miracle on the other hand would be.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
funny. the people who work the cash registers are nothing but peons. the boss, or the manager, whatever you want to call it, the one who mixes the pills in the back is the one who is the licensed pharmacist.
You shouldn't call yourself a peon. It's terrible for self esteem.
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11
funny. the people who work the cash registers are nothing but peons. the boss, or the manager, whatever you want to call it, the one who mixes the pills in the back is the one who is the licensed pharmacist.
yeah pretty funny that the one with less education happens to have the easiest job and is more then capable of learning your job by experience...without the waste of money to gain a piece of paper..
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
God did create everything as is but I believe that He also created mechanisms that allow for expanded variation within a kind.I don’t believe that Neanderthals have been proven to exist.
Time is not a mechanism for macroevolution, a miracle on the other hand would be.
so how do you explain stone tools art and the genetic difference between neanderthal and modern man since they are not similar in any way making them a different species..
Originally posted by Wild Shadowactually they would have to spend 3 years at pharmacy school, which requires a bachelor's degree and 2 years of junior college to become a licensed pharmacist. there is no working your way up.
yeah pretty funny that the one with less education happens to have the easiest job and is more then capable of learning your job by experience...without the waste of money to gain a piece of paper..
Originally posted by Lord Knightfa11Now if you listed of coruses like this I would be more impressed. BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Listing 100 level classes are pretty much pointless because as it says Introduction, General or Princables which almost anyone with a degree takes even me. 200 is a bit better but not much more, now go into your 300+ and now you are talking.
ha-ha-ha, funny. yet again, internet people prove their stupidity.To become a licensed pharmacist, a student must graduate form an accredited school of pharmacy, pass a state board examination, and serve an internship under a licensed pharmacist in a community or hospital pharmacy. Most states, including Mississippi, require continuing education for license renewal.
Here is a checklist for pre pharmacy
Biology-141 General Botany 4
Biology-142 General Zoology 4
Chem-102 Introductory Chemistry 5
Chem-104 Introductory Chemistry 5
Chem-251 Organic Chemistry 3
Chem-252 Organic Chemistry 3
Chem-261 Organic Chemistry Laboratory 2
*Math-253 Calculus I 5
Math-254 Calculus II 5 (recommended only)
Physcs-140 Principles of Physics I** (or) 5
Physcs-141 General Physics 5
I'm sorry, what were you saying?
So if you have taken Calculus why is your math so off?
Originally posted by Da Pittmanshow me where it is off?
Now if you listed of coruses like this I would be more impressed. BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT COURSE DESCRIPTIONS Listing 100 level classes are pretty much pointless because as it says Introduction, General or Princables which almost anyone with a degree takes even me. 200 is a bit better but not much more, now go into your 300+ and now you are talking.So if you have taken Calculus why is your math so off?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
God did create everything as is but I believe that He also created mechanisms that allow for expanded variation within a kind.I don’t believe that Neanderthals have been proven to exist.
Time is not a mechanism for macroevolution, a miracle on the other hand would be.
So it's safe to say you think God created a horse; then within time all the different types of horses were born out of this horse or one of it's ancestors and spread throughout the planet?
Yeah, they have actually, you can go see some of their remains with your very own eyes. What do you purpose these Neanderthal remains are?
What?
Originally posted by Robtard
So it's safe to say you think God created a horse; then within time all the different types of horses were born out of this horse or one of it's ancestors and spread throughout the planet?Yeah, they have actually, you can go see some of their remains with your very own eyes. What do you purpose these Neanderthal remains are?
What?
I am not sure how many different equine variations God created originally because the Bible does not reveal this. But the mechanism for variation allowed for difference within a kind.
There are a number of theories about the origin of Neanderthal fossils. I do not subscribe to any one at this time.