Originally posted by .😮U812:.
I don't know why you feel that way, man doesn't have to mean only one but can mean many and the bible doesn't say that god created only one man or woman but created man and woman. Paul talks about man and or Adam in the singular but not in Genisis.
But Adam was created a man and a man is a fully formed human being--not a single-celled organism.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
None of evolutionary theory is provable or proven so to believe in evolution is true blind faith.
Not true, but i'll go along with it for a second.
Should people be allowed to choose their own blind faiths? Shouldn't people be allowed to think on their own make up their own mind.
I don't mind your not believing in evolution. Just your idiot mission to change the minds of those who do.
And again, what about other religions? Are they all false too?
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveGod created man and it doesn't say that he was fully grown, time means nothing to god as the bible says so god breathed life into the earth that formed man and to god a million years is just a blink of the eye. God still created man, we do not say that we created a zygote but we created a child that we all know will grow into a child and then to a man or woman.
But Adam was created a man and a man is a fully formed human being--not a single-celled organism.
Originally posted by .😮U812:.
God created man and it doesn't say that he was fully grown, time means nothing to god as the bible says so god breathed life into the earth that formed man and to god a million years is just a blink of the eye. God still created man, we do not say that we created a zygote but we created a child that we all know will grow into a child and then to a man or woman.
God didn't have to say the obvious. For example, I do not have to say that I am having a conversation with you--but I am.
Do you understand what a man is? It is not anything other than a full grown adult.
Originally posted by PrabhodhSorry witting is not my best subject sometimes.
"God still created man, we do not say that we created a zygote but we created a child that we all know will grow into a child and then to a man or woman."What are you trying to say? What did god make? Try using commas and break down your sentences.
What I mean is that when we say that we made a baby or child that it first started out as an egg and sperm that grew up to be a child then to a man or woman. The same way can be seen as god creating man, that he took the earth and blew life into it which would form into man, this could have taken millions and millions of years but for god this would be a blink of an eye.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
God didn't have to say the obvious. For example, I do not have to say that I am having a conversation with you--but I am.Do you understand what a man is? It is not anything other than a full grown adult.
And it's painfully obvious he's interpreting the Bible his own way, just as you do/have.
To him, Adam/man = mankind, it seems.
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveI do know what a man is please try and be civil but man doesn't always mean a full grown adult. Man can also mean all humans such as in the word mankind, this doesn't mean just adult males, but what about the Hebrew word for man is Adam?
God didn't have to say the obvious. For example, I do not have to say that I am having a conversation with you--but I am.Do you understand what a man is? It is not anything other than a full grown adult.
Originally posted by Prabhodh
Not true, but i'll go along with it for a second.Should people be allowed to choose their own blind faiths? Shouldn't people be allowed to think on their own make up their own mind.
I don't mind your not believing in evolution. Just your idiot mission to change the minds of those who do.
And again, what about other religions? Are they all false too?
Scientists have never created life from non-life matter, nor have they produced new genetic information, created by random mutations of DNA, in a lab. Not to mention there are no transitional fossils between any one species and another showing any link or gradual change from one into the other. Hence, evolution is unscientific.
These are the facts.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Scientists have never created life from non-life matter, nor have they produced new genetic information, created by random mutations of DNA, in a lab. Not to mention there are no transitional fossils between any one species and another showing any link or gradual change from one into the other. Hence, evolution is unscientific.These are the facts.
I'm not going to talk about evolution anymore. You've got no clue and are not willing to learn.
OTHER RELIGIONS, ARE THEY ALL FALSE?