Before I begin, let me give you the concept of a Straw Man.
Basically, it means that you are making an argument against points that I am not arguing for. Basically, I agree with your stance, and if you read what I have posted about health care I have been very specific in stating that there needs to be government involvement to enable accessibility to all people.
Originally posted by Starhawk
1)You don't pay taxes, true, instead you pay high insurance costs in a system that is grossly mismanaged. And as I said if a person in the US gets seriously ill, they can be bankrupted by the medical expenses.
1 - I would never argue in favor of high insurance costs
2 - I would never argue in favor of a mismanaged system
3 - I would never argue in favor of a system that bankrupts people
4 - High taxes are part of a trade off of pros and cons of the public private debate. I would personally much rather pay directly for high quality care could I afford it, however, I would never deny adequate care to someone simply because of cost.
Originally posted by Starhawk
2)what about the people in society that cannot take care of themselves? The disabled and mentally impaired? Those born into poverty? Should they just die? No, we have a moral and in Canada thankfully a legal obligation to pay taxes to help not just ourselves but society as a whole.
1 - I would never argue that the mentally or physically disabled can fend for themselves in a modern western economy, however groups that represent the physically disabled would (if only in favor of the physically disabled).
2 - I would never argue for a system that ostracized those in poverty from the institutions they need.
3 - I've never argued against taxation for certain medical expenditures.
4 - Moral obligation by its nature is subjective and its use in this context shows a lack of understanding of the basics in classical liberal AND conservative philosophy.
5 - Making such extreme counterexamples to points I am not even making is a sign that you are too emotionally involved in this issue to have a non biased opinion. This is what I see as being the most prevalent problem in reaching a real understanding of how best to deliver health care to the people ensuring both high end research and technology but also providing low end accessibility. In my honest opining the UK is probably the best example of this in the world.