Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yeah, the difference is; It was one retarded kid, playing in the street and you were laughing at him in secret.The intent remains the same, except you found his disability to be worthy of a laugh. We are just making light of mass exaggeration.
-AC
No you were making light of 4 babies being essentially tortured.
Originally posted by Starhawk
No you were making light of 4 babies being essentially tortured.
We were making fun, but well aware that nobody here thinks it's a good thing, the two CAN be separate.
It's worse to laugh at a disability, but I'm not gonna say you're wrong, as you're not abusing the kid.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
We were making fun, but well aware that nobody here thinks it's a good thing, the two CAN me separate.It's worse to laugh at a disability, but I'm not gonna say you're wrong, as you're not abusing the kid.
-AC
No they can not be separate. And I myself am disabled, I suffer from a disease called Fibromyalgia.
Originally posted by Starhawk
No they can not be separate. And I myself am disabled, I suffer from a disease called Fibromyalgia.
They can, actually, as we are all living proof of.
None of us, certainly not me, actually believe this is a good situation or occurance. Us making light of it does not suggest otherwise, or suggest anything other than we do not think it's AS bad as you do, i.e; Sacred from humour.
We're living proof that you are wrong.
-Ac
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's been revealed that Starhawk thinks a retard playing in the middle of the street is good for a bit of a laugh.-AC
sickening. not the retard playing in the street, i mean the hypocrisy...thats sickening.
Originally posted by Starhawk
There is a difference.1) I wouldn't laugh at the guy directly.
2) He isn't a victim like these kids were.
no, im sure he/she would be asking for it, right? same as a toddler playing in the street. Roflzilla on LOLerskates. oh wait thats different.
no yapsquawk, you're right. a retarded person who is so poorly parented that they would end up unsupervised and about to be killed in traffic is not a victim. because you said so. because retarded people arent real people, right?
Originally posted by Starhawk
No your not as I still think anyone who finds it funny has a demented sense of humor.
That wasn't the issue. Think that all you want, however, my point was that finding humour in it does not mean we do not think it's a bad thing.
You said they cannot be separated, they can, we're proof.
Not very sharp for a law student.
-AC
Originally posted by Starhawk
No your not as I still think anyone who finds it funny has a demented sense of humor.
absolutely! anyone who finds it funny for a neglected retarded person to be killed in traffic must be a monster.
i guess people like you just find only humor in the pain and suffering of innocent mentally challenged people and their families. sickening
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That wasn't the issue. Think that all you want, however, my point was that finding humour in it does not mean we do not think it's a bad thing.You said they cannot be separated, they can, we're proof.
Not very sharp for a law student.
-AC
In your mind your proof, I think you all have a very sick idea of humor. You can think what you want, but that is my opinion of you guys.
Originally posted by Schecter
absolutely! anyone who finds it funny for a neglected retarded person to be killed in traffic must be a monster.i guess people like you just find only humor in the pain and suffering of innocent mentally challenged people and their families. sickening
Never was it stipulated that the kid would be hit by a car. Don't lie and put words in my mouth.
Originally posted by Starhawk
Never was it stipulated that the kid would be hit by a car. Don't lie and put words in my mouth.
no, a retarded person playing in traffic is a safe and innocent thing to laugh at. you're right. same if it was a child.
its much safer to be on pavement where 1-2 ton vehicles fly by at 60 miles per hour than to get hit with a magazine.
Originally posted by Schecter
no, a retarded person playing in traffic is a safe and innocent thing to laugh at. you're right. same if it was a child.its much safer to be on pavement where 1-2 ton vehicles fly by at 60 miles per hour than to get hit with a magazine.
It was also never stipulated that there was cars involved at all in the scenario. Your still lying.
Originally posted by Starhawk
In your mind your proof, I think you all have a very sick idea of humor. You can think what you want, but that is my opinion of you guys.
What are you not getting? Think that all you want, fine, cool.
The POINT was; Thinking it's bad does not mean we cannot find humour in it.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
What are you not getting? Think that all you want, fine, cool.The POINT was; Thinking it's bad does not mean we cannot find humour in it.
-AC
To you it doesn't, Whats next? Your gonna make fun of rape victims? I bet to you guys 9/11 was nothing more the a sketch comedy routine.
Originally posted by Starhawk
It was also never stipulated that there was cars involved at all in the scenario. Your still lying.
so now you resort to deliberate stupidity and childish games. you laugh at someone who's not fit to look after themselves, playing in the street, which is an obvious and disgusting reference to the idea that they would be struck and killed. not even to mention that you would be so cruel and low as to laugh at retarded people.
great job yipsquark. takes a real humanitarian to laugh at and mock those less fortunate than you. sickening.
oh but some kids gets hit with magazines and you get to piss and cry and demand that everyone piss and cry, and insult anyone who doesnt.
Originally posted by Schecter
so now you resort to deliberate stupidity and childish games. you laugh at someone who's not fit to look after themselves, playing in the street, which is an obvious and disgusting reference to the idea that they would be struck and killed. not even to mention that you would be so cruel and low as to laugh at retarded people.great job yipsquark. takes a real humanitarian to laugh at and mock those less fortunate than you. sickening.
Stop using my name incorrectly, WD already covered that. If in any way AC had said the kid would be hit by a car then no, I would not find it funny, but he didn't so stop pretending he did.
Originally posted by Starhawk
LOL whatever, I know you guys for what you are and thats good enough for me.You may now continue your ranting about how funny child abuse is.
ok good, and you continue to be a crying antagonistic hypocrite, degrading people less fortunate than you. and ill lol at every well deserved misfortune that comes your way. el oh el