God (YHWH) has fans: Allah, Muhammed, Muslims

Originally posted by Devil King
Indeed. How many times does the Torah mention Jesus by name? Or mary and Joseph? It doesn't. In fact, the inclusion of the first five books of the bible that do not mention Jesus are included to ellude to the fact that Jesus is the Jewish savior being awaited by the Jews. This is where JIA will hide, lending credence to his own faith while denying the legitimacy of any and all others.

Also, it shouldn't suprise you that he's being willfully ignorant, that's what socks do.

Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God said, "Let [COLOR=blue]Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not become taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand [B]Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God said, "Let [COLOR=blue]Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not become taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one. [/B]

Or it could mean any number of gods.

Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God [i.e. 'Elohiym {el-o-heem'}]
said, "Let Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand [B]Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not become taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one. [/B]

You already posted this. Why did you post it again?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand [B]Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God [i.e. 'elohiym {el-o-heem'}]
said, "Let Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not become taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one. [/B]

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Or it could mean any number of gods.

Originally posted by Fatima
Mohammad in the Bible ....!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c4Sj_GRZ_o

Mohammed or Muhammed is not mentioned once in the Bible.

Originally posted by Fatima
Mohammad in the Bible ....!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c4Sj_GRZ_o

Muhammad, Mohammed, or Muhammed is not mentioned once in the Bible.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Mohammed or Muhammed is not mentioned once in the Bible.

homer

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Jesus is not mentioned by His earthly Name, no, but you need to understand [B]Who Jesus really is (Jesus is God). Jesus is God in the flesh, i.e. the Word flesh-covered. In the very first book of the Torah (i.e. Genesis) it is written:

Genesis 1:26
"Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, in Our likeness...."

[COLOR=darkblue]That verse of Scripture undoubtedly refers to the triune God Who is comprised of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

So, Jesus is metioned in the Torah but not by His earthly name because He had not become taken upon Himself human flesh yet. I can give you several other chapters and verses to support what I maintain, but I have give you just one. [/B]

You believe Jesus to be god. We all get that.

And genesis 1:26 isn't talking about Jesus, it's talking about mankind. That would be much more apparent if you posted the rest of the verse. Now, in another thread, you said that god had to create life from another dimension because he had no body. Now you want to say that god made man in his own image? So, now god looks like a man, but is floating around in another dimension with a beard and pretty blue eyes? What kind of drugs are you taking? I really shouldn't have to explain your own religion to you.

Absolutely, tell us all the other verses when Jesus is mentioned in the Torah.

Seriously, why has no one banned this nutbag?

Originally posted by Bardock42

The Bible is God's (YHWH's) Book not Allah's so it cannot refer to a number of gods (in that context).

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The Bible is God's (YHWH's) Book not Allah's so it cannot refer to a number of gods (in that context).

That is the most circular reasoning I have ever....EVER...heard.

Originally posted by Devil King
You believe Jesus to be god. We all get that.

And genesis 1:26 isn't talking about Jesus, it's talking about mankind. That would be much more apparent if you posted the rest of the verse. Now, in another thread, you said that god had to create life from another dimension because he had no body. Now you want to say that god made man in his own image? So, now god looks like a man, but is floating around in another dimension with a beard and pretty blue eyes? What kind of drugs are you taking? I really shouldn't have to explain your own religion to you.

Absolutely, tell us all the other verses when Jesus is mentioned in the Torah.

Seriously, why has no one banned this nutbag?

The part of the verse that states,

"Let Us... Our image... Our likeness...."

is talking about the triune God of which Jesus Christ is included. I purposely excluded the latter part of the verse because it does not pertain to this discussion about Jesus Christ being mentioned in the Torah. But the beginning of the verse does mention Jesus Christ because Jesus is included in the Godhead.

God's image and likeness is "spirit" in terms of essence, but in tems of His shape or features, God has an anthropomorphic anatomy. God's anatomy is where we derive our basic makeup from (our anatomy is not some random, chance occurrence). In addition, the reason that we have a head, torso, arms, hands, waist, legs, and feet is because God has those features. No God does not look like a us per se, we look like Him (in terms of our basic, anatomical compostion).

Now, I never said that God was floating around anywhere with a beard and pretty blue eyes these are your words. If I had said that then I could understand your derogatory remark about me being a nutbag, but these are your words not mine.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
You already posted this. Why did you post it again?

I re-posted it because there was an error in it. I corrected it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That is the most circular reasoning I have ever....EVER...heard.

It is no more circular than you stating that your parents are your true, biological parents. Even if you got a DNA test to prove that your parents and you share some chemical connection, how do you know that the test was not falsified?

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I re-posted it because there was an error in it. I corrected it.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It is no more circular than you stating that your parents are your true, biological parents. Even if you got a DNA test to prove that your parents and you share some chemical connection, how do you know that the test was not falsified?

{"How can you be sure the Bible is true?"
"Because the Bible says it is true"} That is circular reasoning.

Your mother and father being your biological parents because a test says so is actually the opposite of circular reasoning.

And there's no such thing as a false positive on a DNA test.

Originally posted by Strangelove
.....No. That's not right at all.

{"How can you be sure the Bible is true?"
"Because the Bible says it is true"} That is circular reasoning.

Your mother and father being your biological parents because a test says so is actually the opposite of circular reasoning.

And there's no such thing as a false positive on a DNA test.

It is not the opposite if the integrity of the test is brought into question.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
It is not the opposite if the integrity of the test is brought into question.

Circular Reasoning is using something to prove itself. (i.e. The Bible is true because the Bibles says so)

Non-circular reasoning is using an outside source to prove something. (i.e. We are your parents because this test says so)

It doesn't matter if the test is wrong or not, it's not circular reasoning.

Originally posted by Strangelove
No. Wrong again.

Circular Reasoning is using something to prove itself. (i.e. The Bible is true because the Bibles says so)

Non-circular reasoning is using an outside source to prove something. (i.e. We are your parents because this test says so)

It doesn't matter if the test is wrong or not, it's not circular reasoning.

Fine.

😄

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I re-posted it because there was an error in it. I corrected it.

OK, was it too late to fix it with edit?