Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Well they're not calling him a pedophile just for having kids over are they? Couple that with the allegations made against him and you've got a reason.No, I doubt he will ever be able to remove that label, not to those who definitely believe it anyway. It isn't because of idiots who can't keep their noses out though, it's because of the way he acted in Martin Bashir documentary and his other rumoured, and documented antics.
That Bashir documentary was bullshit and everyone knows it. It was entirely unfair and biasedly conducted.
Look, his attitude towards kids in general and what we know he has done with them (Sleepovers.) is, if you wanna call it anything. odd at WORST. You do not know what those parents told those kids, what those kids told the parents. All we know is he got accused of shit that really, people are only assuming is true because has has other odd characteristics, and that is just not right.
So the man likes kids, so what? Although I hate the song, I have to quote it:
"Thou shalt not assume that any man over the age of 30, that plays with a child who is not his own, is a paedophile. Some people are just nice.".
I do not believe he is a paedophile, for one second. Not because of who he is, but because I just don't see enough to make that assumption.
You and others talk about his "bribes". He has money to burn and he KNOWS that people will keep dragging it out and call him guilty ANYWAY, like certain folks are doing here. So if it spared him a year of legal battles that people will just ignore ANYWAY, why not pay an out of court settlement? Furthermore, if he molested your kid, how much would it cost to shut you up? I personally would want to see the man locked away, there would be no price, unless...of course, I was out for money anyway.
-AC