MJ November 2007

Started by Alpha Centauri7 pages

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Well they're not calling him a pedophile just for having kids over are they? Couple that with the allegations made against him and you've got a reason.

No, I doubt he will ever be able to remove that label, not to those who definitely believe it anyway. It isn't because of idiots who can't keep their noses out though, it's because of the way he acted in Martin Bashir documentary and his other rumoured, and documented antics.

That Bashir documentary was bullshit and everyone knows it. It was entirely unfair and biasedly conducted.

Look, his attitude towards kids in general and what we know he has done with them (Sleepovers.) is, if you wanna call it anything. odd at WORST. You do not know what those parents told those kids, what those kids told the parents. All we know is he got accused of shit that really, people are only assuming is true because has has other odd characteristics, and that is just not right.

So the man likes kids, so what? Although I hate the song, I have to quote it:

"Thou shalt not assume that any man over the age of 30, that plays with a child who is not his own, is a paedophile. Some people are just nice.".

I do not believe he is a paedophile, for one second. Not because of who he is, but because I just don't see enough to make that assumption.

You and others talk about his "bribes". He has money to burn and he KNOWS that people will keep dragging it out and call him guilty ANYWAY, like certain folks are doing here. So if it spared him a year of legal battles that people will just ignore ANYWAY, why not pay an out of court settlement? Furthermore, if he molested your kid, how much would it cost to shut you up? I personally would want to see the man locked away, there would be no price, unless...of course, I was out for money anyway.

-AC

YouTube video

Yeah!!!!

Thx 4 that vid man

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That Bashir documentary was bullshit and everyone knows it. It was entirely unfair and biasedly conducted.

-AC

The Bashir documentary may have been cut biasedly, however Jackson still said those things and still acted that way at some point, that's undeniable. Jackson agreed to have the documentary on him, he made his bed in a way.

His attitude towards kids is odd yes, it's not his attitude that's the worrying thing though. He's got his own child and his attitude towards him appears entirely different than other children.

What you believe is irrelevant in the fact that people have a right to question his innocence, just as you have a right to proclaim his innocence.

The point of the bribes is that in the eyes of the people it suggests that he has something to hide, other than damaging his reputation.It is bizarre that the parents accepted the money yes, though money does talk. What about those that did not accept out of court settlements and took it all the way to court?

I am approaching this from an entirely objective angle and do not have any opinion on it. I'll also admit you've made some very good points.

P.S:- yeah that song's shit.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
The Bashir documentary may have been cut biasedly, however Jackson still said those things and still acted that way at some point, that's undeniable. Jackson agreed to have the documentary on him, he made his bed in a way.

Only a fool would suggest he's done nothing to perhaps make his situation a bit more awkward for himself, but I don't believe that necessarily means anything.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
His attitude towards kids is odd yes, it's not his attitude that's the worrying thing though. He's got his own child and his attitude towards him appears entirely different than other children.

That's nobody's business.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
What you believe is irrelevant in the fact that people have a right to question his innocence, just as you have a right to proclaim his innocence.

Yeah, but people go beyond "I think he did it.". It somehow becomes their business, their right, their right to know etc. It's ridiculous.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
The point of the bribes is that in the eyes of the people it suggests that he has something to hide, other than damaging his reputation.It is bizarre that the parents accepted the money yes, though money does talk. What about those that did not accept out of court settlements and took it all the way to court?

So what? Those kind of people will always think he did it, so in his position, what has he got to lose? He goes to court, wins, they say "He still did it.". He pays someone off to avoid court time, THEY mysteriously vanish, "He still did it!".

As for your last question, what about those people? They lost. Jackson was acquitted. It's still not enough for some people. It's like conspiracy theorists; nothing is ever as it seems, everything is a lie etc. It's just dumb when you accept nothing.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
I am approaching this from an entirely objective angle and do not have any opinion on it. I'll also admit you've made some very good points.

P.S:- yeah that song's shit.

Fair enough.

-AC

As we're not talking about Michael's music here is some off topic news

http://blackvoices.aol.com/blogs/2007/06/04/michael-jackson-white-mans-burden/

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
As if you know more than the American courts who deemed him innocent.

Idiot.

-AC

im talking about the plastic surgery

arse

For someone who doesn't care, you show up here a lot.

-AC

It's fun here 🙂