Wolverine

Started by Creshosk56 pages

Originally posted by Disappear
you realize by counting to infinity, i'd be going through all known numbers en route, thus proving my point, yes?

there are times that i truly love you, cresh. one might say i have a cresh crush.

Actully you'd never reach infinity. And that's kind of the point. The only way to get to infinity is to start off with infinity.

You are both right. Disappear says that infinity contains every known number - which is true - and Cresh says that you can't have a percentage of infinity, because even a precetage of infinity is still infinity - which is also true.

wouldn't that simply mean every number is simply a 1/infinity percent of infinity? infinity divided by one is infinity; and infinity divided by infinity is [in principle] one. thus, infinity contains both one and infinity. infinity is also divisible by every other integer, though it's status as an abstract concept keeps the remainder from being anything but infinity.

you cannot count to infinity. that is true. you can [not as a biological entity, but in theory] count infinitely toward infinity, thus negating any numerical value potentially applied to the term and supplementing it with the definition of "ever increasing." and with no upper boundary to the strength the hulk could possess, he could continue to develop strength infinitely, making him an "infinity" of power.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Actully you'd never reach infinity. And that's kind of the point. The only way to get to infinity is to start off with infinity.

Limits, my friend, limits.

Originally posted by Soljer
Limits, my friend, limits.
When talking about the concept of infinity?

Originally posted by Disappear
wouldn't that simply mean every number is simply a 1/infinity percent of infinity? infinity divided by one is infinity; and infinity divided by infinity is [in principle] one. thus, infinity contains both one and infinity. infinity is also divisible by every other integer, though it's status as an abstract concept keeps the remainder from being anything but infinity.

you cannot count to infinity. that is true. you can [not as a biological entity, but in theory] count infinitely toward infinity, thus negating any numerical value potentially applied to the term and supplementing it with the definition of "ever increasing." and with no upper boundary to the strength the hulk could possess, he could continue to develop strength infinitely, making him an "infinity" of power.

You'd never reach infinity. Even if you had an eternity. that's the problem. The number would increase forever but it would never ever reach infinity.

Originally posted by Creshosk
When talking about the concept of infinity?

You'd never reach infinity. Even if you had an eternity. that's the problem. The number would increase forever but it would never ever reach infinity.

No, at eternity, the number WOULD be infinity.

Hence, limits.

Originally posted by Soljer
No, at eternity, the number WOULD be infinity.

Hence, limits.

Umm... You wouldn't reach eternity... the only way to reach infinity is to start off at infinity.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Umm... You wouldn't reach eternity... the only way to reach infinity is to start off at infinity.

HENCE, LIMITS.

>_<.

Originally posted by Soljer
HENCE, LIMITS.

>_<.

To place limits is to remove both eternity and infinity. If you place a limit on the limitless it is no longer that limitless thing.

Originally posted by Creshosk
To place limits is to remove both eternity and infinity. If you place a limit on the limitless it is no longer that limitless thing.

Not 'limit' in the lay sense.

Mathematical limits.

Originally posted by Soljer
No, at eternity, the number WOULD be infinity.

Hence, limits.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Umm... You wouldn't reach eternity... the only way to reach infinity is to start off at infinity.
durverine

Originally posted by Soljer
Not 'limit' in the lay sense.

Mathematical limits.

If you put a limit on it it's no longer infinity.

Tell me you're joking....

Otherwise - I think I might have to round up some Dur's...

Originally posted by Creshosk
If you put a limit on it it's no longer infinity.
none180

I can't tell if you're joking.

Originally posted by Soljer
Tell me you're joking....

Otherwise - I think I might have to round up some Dur's...

Originally posted by SpunkySmurph
none180

I can't tell if you're joking.

creshdur

you keep trying to define infinity in numerical terms, despite that being impossible. it's just as impossible to "start at infinity" as it is to reach infinity, because infinity is continually increasing. the only applicable definition of infinity that can be used is that it increases without bound [the accepted definition in higher mathematics.] attempting to comprehend it as a numerical term is literally impossible.

Originally posted by Disappear
you keep trying to define infinity in numerical terms, despite that being impossible. it's just as impossible to "start at infinity" as it is to reach infinity, because infinity is continually increasing. the only applicable definition of infinity that can be used is that it increases without bound [the accepted definition in higher mathematics.] attempting to comprehend it as a numerical term is literally impossible.

False. Infinity is NOT continually increasing - if it were, it'd have a bound (an expanding bound, but a bound nonetheless). Infinity isn't increasing. It isn't expanding. It simply IS.

Originally posted by Soljer
False. Infinity is NOT continually increasing - if it were, it'd have a bound (an expanding bound, but a bound nonetheless). Infinity isn't increasing. It isn't expanding. It simply IS.

Not bad.... However infinity is often used incorrectly even by scientists. For instance when dealing with black holes the calculations go infinite (Hawking). No Mr. Hawking Black holes are finite. The numbers are just to big for us at the moment. Ambiguity abounds in the infinite........

Wow a infinity discussion in a wolverine thread...wonders never cease

Anybody have an idea who Romulus is? are they making a new villain who they will give a background on? or is Romulus someone we forgot about?

At this point I'd just like to comment that in leading back to what started this discussion, people are trying to make sense of Hulk's power set as if it's more viable than Wolverine's....

Hulk gets his power from pocket demensions.. it's no way in hell more plausible.