So I thought I knew my neighbors...

Started by Shelbert Lemon5 pages

105 registered varied offences in the county I live in. 2 of which were convicted with Indecent Liberties with Minors less then a mile from where I live. I think I should show this to my daughters. hmm

Information will help them better then momma packing heat. 😖

Originally posted by Shelbert Lemon
105 registered varied offences in the county I live in. 2 of which were convicted with Indecent Liberties with Minors less then a mile from where I live. I think I should show this to my daughters. hmm

Information will help them better then momma packing heat. 😖

Whats wrong with both?

yeah....whats wrong with having a loaded firearm that your kids might find and play with when you're not in the room? wouldnt you feel safer?

I would, my kids frighten and confuse me.

Asking for things I can't provide, like love and food and clothing and not raping them... Man, when did this country go down the shitter? People now bother me when I beat them in public. Not even worth having kids anymore.

Not a problem if you exercise proper control. If you are responsible the only one with a bullet in it's head should be the filthy Sex Offender.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Not a problem if you exercise proper control. If you are responsible the only one with a bullet in it's head should be the filthy Sex Offender.

That's what people always say until they come home to a kid with a new hole in their head.

Because they were careless.

yup, but at least junior's cornhole wouldnt be molested. not a single traumatic memory of rape in his/her brain....splattered on a wall among chunks of skull fragments. safe and secure and unmolested 👆

Originally posted by Starhawk
Whats wrong with both?
because I dont believe I need a gun to protect my family.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Not a problem if you exercise proper control. If you are responsible the only one with a bullet in it's head should be the filthy Sex Offender.
Originally posted by Starhawk
Because they were careless.

WHy are you so fukking murder happy? 😖
You want to bring justice to those who murder and commit pedophilia and use the death penalty. ... and put a bullet in the head of a would be offender yourself... so it seems you are encouraging..

...either way it goes you want someone to die. You have issues.

Originally posted by Shelbert Lemon

...either way it goes you want someone to die. You have issues.

its always the case. he's always talking about people he labels "not human" and how he'd like to murder them or see them executed or murdered. and gruesome ways they should be executed or murdered.

we're supposed to all think he's not a sick person

No I think they deserve to die and self-defense is not murder.

"Sex Offender Registries: Putting Lives At Risk?" by Gitika Ahuja

The brutal slayings of two convicted sex offenders from Maine have re-ignited national debate on whether online sex offender registries should provide extensive personal information on their registrants.

Twenty-year-old Stephen Marshall of Nova Scotia, Canada, killed himself aboard a Boston-bound bus after allegedly murdering two convicted sex offenders in Maine, whom he'd found on the state's sex offender Web site.

One of the victims, 24-year-old William Elliott, was convicted four years ago of having sex with a girlfriend who was only days away from her 16th birthday. Elliott served four months in jail.

Marshall, who had no previous criminal record, had earlier gone online and obtained personal information on both Elliott and Joseph L. Gray, 57, another convicted sex offender, whom Marshall is also suspected of murdering earlier that day.

Investigators also revealed that Marshall obtained the addresses and other information of 34 people from Maine's online sex offender registry.

Now some are asking, what about the privacy rights of sex offenders? Do state Web sites provide too much information and even promote vigilante violence?

Without the registry, "he'd still be alive today," Shirley Turner, Elliott's mother, told The Boston Globe. "He didn't say anything; he just shot him in cold blood," she said.

She described her son as a "warm, loving young man" who suffered from disabilities and "was doing so good."

The state of Maine makes photos, names, addresses, ages and criminal histories of about 2,200 registered sex offenders available online.

The online sex registry in Maine was temporarily taken down after it got word of the deaths, but it has since been re-established.

Outrage Across State Lines

The Vermont chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union has argued that its online state registry should be removed in light of legislation the state Senate recently approved that would would make it easier to post information on sex offenders by expanding the kind of offenses that would require registration.

"This is a stark reminder that there's no evidence that online sex offender registries increase public safety. In fact, they might just do the opposite," said Allen Gilbert, executive director of the Vermont ACLU.

"They should not be making any changes to the online registry unless they can determine that, indeed, the registry increases public safety. We think they never should have created it. They should just pull it immediately."

Not the First Case

While incidents of vigilante violence against sex offenders are rare, this week's case is not the first.

In September Michael A. Mullen of Bellingham, Wash., was charged with the murders of two convicted sex offenders after he admitted to police that he wanted to kill them after he saw the information listed on the state's online sex offender Web site. He sits in jail awaiting trial.

In a 2004 case, the state of New Hampshire sent 57-year-old Lawrence Trant to jail for 10 to 30 years after he pleaded guilty to charges of attempted murder on two convicted sex offenders whose names and addresses he'd located on the state's sex offender registry.

In an interview with The Boston Globe, Trant said, "I don't want people to steal the souls of little kids. I'm doing 30 years for something I think is morally justified."

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I think they deserve to die and self-defense is not murder.

Trivia question:

"Yes I think they deserve to die, and I hope they burn in Hell!"

Who said this and in what movie?

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I think they deserve to die and self-defense is not murder.
I wouldnt want you as a member on a jury much less a lawyer. I dont trust people who always seem to turn to death as a solution.

Originally posted by Schecter
its always the case. he's always talking about people he labels "not human" and how he'd like to murder them or see them executed or murdered. and gruesome ways they should be executed or murdered.

we're supposed to all think he's not a sick person

Yes I see that...

words fail me tonight as Im not feeling well.. so I wil say to this...

major LoL's

Sex Offenders and Murderers deserve to die for what they do, but within the law, either by self-defense or by execution.

Originally posted by chithappens
Trivia question:

"Yes I think they deserve to die, and I hope they burn in Hell!"

Who said this and in what movie?

Samuel L. Jackson - A Time to Kill

YouTube video

Originally posted by Starhawk
Sex Offenders and Murderers deserve to die for what they do, but within the law, either by self-defense or by execution.

So why are you keeping a gun near after they have already been convicted?

http://thegreenman.net.au/mt/gun_deaths_in_usa.htm

30.000 people died in the US in 2001 because of guns, that's a lot of unnecessary dead people to protect yourself from a few pedophiles who have already been thrown in jail and have been punished already.

Of course it's true that they are never "healed" from their attraction and are more likely to repeat themselves, but what do you want to do then? Keep your gun at hand at all times, and always stay near your children? Do you think pedophiles act when the parents are around? Or do you think they are a tiny bit smarter and take the children when they are alone???

The only thing a gun will be able to do is kill your own children. 2 children below 15 die a day in the US because of gun related accidents. Guns don't protect your family from pedophiles.

Originally posted by Schecter
yeah....whats wrong with having a loaded firearm that your kids might find and play with when you're not in the room? wouldnt you feel safer?

no kids for me. and there are safety precautions for such scenarios.

The best being not having a gun.