You Will All Burn In Hell !!!!

Originally posted by FeceMan
I said God could hate, not that God does hate.

Also, asking for salvation is hardly "jumping through hoops," and God certainly can stop people from going to hell.

Your god has to play by the rules. He is bound by time, and makes mistakes.

Actually, God chooses to play by the rules, and He isn't bound by time, and He doesn't make mistakes.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Actually, God chooses to play by the rules, and He isn't bound by time, and He doesn't make mistakes.

Then why did god say to Noah that he regreted making man? That sounds to me like someone who makes mistakes and is stuck with them one they are done.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then why did god say to Noah that he regreted making man? That sounds to me like someone who makes mistakes and is stuck with them one they are done.

Originally posted by FeceMan
God regretted making man because mankind became so crappy. God knew it would happen, but God allowed mankind to make their own choices.

So, you admit that god made a mistake. God had not reason to be upset, because god allowed it to happen. God was an accessory to the crime.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, there are things that god cannot do?

Certainly.

Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
Certainly.

Then the bible is wrong when it says that god is omnipotent.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then the bible is wrong when it says that god is omnipotent.

God can't die or talk.

Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
God can't die or talk.

So, do you think that bible is wrong?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, do you think that bible is wrong?

Mostly.

Originally posted by Blue_Hefner
Mostly.

😆 You just killed perfectly good argument. 😆

Thank you

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, you admit that god made a mistake. God had not reason to be upset, because god allowed it to happen. God was an accessory to the crime.

We can still be sad about things we let happen. If I have a son or daughter and I warn him or her, "Don't touch the cat; she will bite you," and the kid touches the cat and gets bit, I can still be upset that the son or daughter is hurt.

yea but u cant get upset if u created the cat, knowing itd bite, then crated ur son/daughter, knowing hed disobey and be bitten, and then put son/daughter in a positon where theyd disobey, and put the cat there too so itd bite. ur omniscient hence u know everything about everythingm and everything before hand, furtermore, laying the even the foundations with omniscience{creation} is equal to being responsible for the course of events, beginning to end, simply because u cant turn ur head saying, i cudnt have guesss or that wasnt me, ITS ALL YOU, even if u have the power to make the components feal like its them, simply because, the fealing{so called FREE WILL} CAN not let them do sumthing other than what u know is going to happen, its cruelty infact that a person can not change, but still is given fealing enough to feal like its his/her fault.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
yea but u cant get upset if u created the cat, knowing itd bite, then crated ur son/daughter, knowing hed disobey and be bitten, and then put son/daughter in a positon where theyd disobey, and put the cat there too so itd bite. ur omniscient hence u know everything about everythingm and everything before hand, furtermore, laying the even the foundations with omniscience{creation} is equal to being responsible for the course of events, beginning to end, simply because u cant turn ur head saying, i cudnt have guesss or that wasnt me, ITS ALL YOU, even if u have the power to make the components feal like its them, simply because, the fealing{so called FREE WILL} CAN not let them do sumthing other than what u know is going to happen, its cruelty infact that a person can not change, but still is given fealing enough to feal like its his/her fault.

yea but u cant get upset if u created the cat {knowing itd bite}, then crated ur son/daughter {knowing hed disobey and be bitten}, and then put son/daughter in a positon where theyd disobey, and put the cat there too {so itd bite then when they disobey} . ur omniscient, hence u know everything before hand. Furtermore, laying even the the foundations{creation alone without apparently GUIDING the course of the created world} with omniscience is equal to being responsible for the course of events, beginning to end, simply because u cant turn ur head saying "i cudnt have guesss" or "that wasnt me". ITS ALL YOU, even if u have the power to make the components feal like its them. Simply because, the fealing{so called FREE WILL} CAN NOT let them do sumthing OTHER than what YOU{god} KNOWS, IS going to happen. Its cruelty infact that a person can not change, but still is given fealing enough to feal like its his/her fault.

that GOOD ENOUGH, grammer for u to reply?

No, actually, it's horrendous. I'm not going to bother trying to read that until it would pass for a fifth-grade English assignment.

Dolt.

Feceman, i thnk u get the point, but refuse to respond since u know his point is valid....despite its being disorganized

I'm more than willing to respond if he'll clean it up so that I don't have to strain myself deciphering that gibberish.

Originally posted by leonheartmm
yea but u cant get upset if u created the cat {knowing itd bite}, then crated ur son/daughter {knowing hed disobey and be bitten}, and then put son/daughter in a positon where theyd disobey, and put the cat there too {so itd bite then when they disobey} . ur omniscient, hence u know everything before hand. Furtermore, laying even the the foundations{creation alone without apparently GUIDING the course of the created world} with omniscience is equal to being responsible for the course of events, beginning to end, simply because u cant turn ur head saying "i cudnt have guesss" or "that wasnt me". ITS ALL YOU, even if u have the power to make the components feal like its them. Simply because, the fealing{so called FREE WILL} CAN NOT let them do sumthing OTHER than what YOU{god} KNOWS, IS going to happen. Its cruelty infact that a person can not change, but still is given fealing enough to feal like its his/her fault.

that GOOD ENOUGH, grammer for u to reply?