First off, you don't need to try to talk down to me like you do Legend or Neb here.
Then do two things: a.) start paying closer attention and b.) start supporting your assertions. All you've done is attempted to compromise my points instead of offering any of your own or trying to dodge them. That's not how you prove your argument.
Secondly, that statement would be worthless to even state if meant to be as literal as you're now stating. What difference would it be how powerful Yoda is if it were all for not in comparison to Mace?
This is one of those moments where you need to pay more attention. The quote isn't worthless. The novelization calls Yoda "the most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness had ever known." Emphasis on 'powerful'. Mace is not as powerful as either Yoda or Sidious; I haven't stated nor implied that he is. In his fight with Sidious, he beat him because his form enabled him to do so thanks to mystical properties. In Yoda's case, since Yoda is a Light Sider, the properties have no effect on him.
Also, if you would have paid attention, you will notice I never said that you said that Vaapad and shatterpoint were the same thing. I said, for people who may have had a misconception about it, that they are two separate abilities, both of which give Mace an advantage in a fight.
Precisely: two advantages Dooku has no defense against.
Also, you didn't comment on Dooku beating another Vaapad user.
You're comparing Sora Bulq to Mace Windu. One of them [Windu] created and mastered the form. The other [Bulq] attempted to master the form and failed to do so. Windu himself coments that "Vaapad mastered him", not the other way around.
And you think that Dooku mastering Makashi to the absolute highest degree still comes up short to Mace creating Vaapad?
Which one of them impresses me more? Windu, easily. One of them [Windu] created the undisputed deadliest lightsaber form, according to Yoda, at an incredibly young age. The other required decades to master a classic form [Dooku]. Both are impressive and both of them are among the finest swordsmen ever, but Windu is undoubtably more impressive.
It's similar to comparing Jimi Hendrix to Randy Rhoads. Both of them mastered the guitar and were world-class guitarists, but one of them achieved international recognition for making innovations and new methods of playing. That's why Hendrix is - and will forever be - a household name whilst Rhoads isn't.
As far as just saber work (taking out the ability to redirect darkside powers) you think that Mace is a better technical saber duelist than Dooku?
If by 'technical' you mean accurate and precise, no. Dooku's form is based on efficiency, precision, and accuracy moreso than any other form. Mace might rival him in that category if only for his ability to detect shatterpoints, but as far as forms themselves go? No.
But if you're referring to power and speed, yes, Mace's form is better.
Again, I didn't say you said it was impossible for Mace to lose; I said thats the way you're making it sound; also as if Dooku doesn't have what it take to finish him early.
Do I see Dooku taking him out early? Hell no. Dooku's form is based on precision and accuracy, most of his duels are long and drawn out. Mace is based on power and speed, usually indicating quick fights. Sidious - whose form is similar - couldn't overcome Windu, merely kept him on the defensive.
Also, you're last point sounds like you're basing it on a possible ABC argument, which you of all people should know, doesn't always work.
This isn't an ABC argument. Because the skills and techniques Mace used to overcome Sidious apply here with Dooku, and there is absolutely no indication that Dooku will have any better luck. It wasn't based on circumstance or 'luck-of-the-draw' that Windu beat Sidious, it was based on the properties of Windu's form that apply to all fights with dark siders.
Windu will win a lightsaber fight.