I do not understand that where this theory of "Dooku being better then Revan in Saber Combat" came from?
First of all, we need to check some facts that provide a good account of Revan's melee skills.
Case A) Revan killed two Terentatek beasts with ease in a single combat in the Tomb of Naga Sadow.
Now just imagine the level of skill that would be required to accomplish this feat and also keep the following facts in mind:
- Terentatek beasts are immune to Force attacks.
- These monsters were dubbed as "Jedi killers" for a good reason.
So this feat shows that Revan seems to possess exceptional melee combat skills.
Case B) Revan killed Yusanis in a single combat. Now Yusanis is the greatest Echani warrior ever known and was among the top swordsmen in his time. Defeating Yusanis in melee combat was not a small feat. Echani warriors believed that Revan's precognition capabilities were superior to that of Yusanis and thus that helped him a lot in this clash.
Case C) Revan also killed Malak in a duel and as evident from a Duron's vision, Malak was struck down in a Light Saber clash. And Malak was also among the top swordsmen of his age and was possibly adept in offensive Saber techniques including Juyo.
So all these cases suggest that Revan was adept in melee combat as well. But the problem is that we do not know about the full extent of Revan's melee capabilities.
So I really cannot declare that whether Dooku > Revan in Saber Combat or not. And at-least "Case A" makes Revan's case a bit stronger in this regard.
So all those who are outrightly stating that Dooku > Revan in Saber Combat are actually making a mistake because there is no canonical evidence to back this up.