Originally posted by chillmeistergen
You can't say it's OK when I do it, but I have a problem with other people's decisions as to how much they feel appropriate to use. You either don't approve at all, or tolerate it.
Originally posted by Yuna_And_Tidus
I never did. I said it was okay as long as it doesn't become a habit, for ANYONE. My 3 times of doing it have never become habitual.
Why is there an assumption that other people, and public in general, cannot decide for themselves what they are to do with their bodies, so there has to be this whole ''what is good for you and what is not''?
Why is there an assumption that there is an objective and true higher moral platform in regards to drugs and anyone else who disagrees must be, not only wrong, but stupid?
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Why is there an assumption that there is an objective and true higher moral platform in regards to drugs and anyone else who disagrees must be, not only wrong, but stupid?
Hey, it's not just drugs. I pretty much think people are wrong and or stupid about everything.
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Why is there an assumption that other people, and public in general, cannot decide for themselves what they are to do with their bodies, so there has to be this whole ''what is good for you and what is not''?Why is there an assumption that there is an objective and true higher moral platform in regards to drugs and anyone else who disagrees must be, not only wrong, but stupid?
Girl fight!
(Please)
Originally posted by HK47
Query: What does it being none of my business have to do with anything?Second query: What prevents it from being my buisness?
Response: It has everything to do with it, you don't want people to take drugs because you personally don't like the idea of them. It's their business what they do to their own bodies. Why should it be your business to make judgements for other people? It's completely condescending, and a lot of people who take drugs have a lot better sense of judgement than you; why should you get to choose for them?
Second response: The fact that it's their body, you're not told how to treat your property, why should you be told how to treat your body?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Response: It has everything to do with it, you don't want people to take drugs because you personally don't like the idea of them. It's their business what they do to their own bodies. Why should it be your business to make judgements for other people?
You need to re-read my posts apparently bucko. I never said drugs should be illegal. But to say I don't have a right to judge them, well, that's just retarded. If someone has the right to smoke crack then ceartainly someone has the right to judge.
It's completely condescending, and a lot of people who take drugs have a lot better sense of judgement than you; why should you get to choose for them?
Second response: The fact that it's their body, you're not told how to treat your property, why should you be told how to treat your body? [/B]
Conclusion:
You don't have any rights fool. And you will never have any rights untill there is zero government. Any rights you have are merely what the government has forseen as a bone to throw at you to get you to shutup, cooperate, but has no significant impact on them. The idea that you think you have rights is laughable.
Originally posted by HK47
Observation:You were the one that pointed out that drugs saved lives. So now that I've called you on that assetment you runback to civil rights. Which i'm not arguing about.
Conclusion:
There is no point in debating with you. You're nothing but an ape who likes to hear himself talk.
Statement:
I stand by my conviction. Drugs should not be illegal, but they are useless and anybody who does them is a moron.
Conclusion: You are an imbecile.
Originally posted by inimalist
Is the legality of a substance to you an important quality of it being a drug? I know I shouldn't ask you to explain things, heaven forbid, but maybe you could give me more information on what you mean when you say a drug is something that causes people in authority to be uncomfortable?
?
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Why is there an assumption that other people, and public in general, cannot decide for themselves what they are to do with their bodies, so there has to be this whole ''what is good for you and what is not''?Why is there an assumption that there is an objective and true higher moral platform in regards to drugs and anyone else who disagrees must be, not only wrong, but stupid?
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
So you condone drug use, just not drug use to a level you see as being excessive? Do you not think that's hypocritical?
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Girl fight!(Please)
Originally posted by Yuna_And_Tidus
No, not at all. I wish drugs had never been created but since they were and since there's no stopping its usage, I'd hope to God that people were smart about it, but there's really no "smart" to drug usage.
just because you tag on this negative and reckless stigma to smoking a joint doesnt mean its negative and reckless. in fact it would have more to say about your behavior than the substance itself
some people drink 14 beers and drive 120 mph on the freeway.
some people crack open one or two beers in front of the tv and relax on a lazy sunday.
which do you think defines the moral/ethical standing of alcohol? thats right, NEITHER. its simply a substance.
Originally posted by Schecter
just because you tag on this negative and reckless stigma to smoking a joint doesnt mean its negative and reckless. in fact it would have more to say about your behavior than the substance itselfsome people drink 14 beers and drive 120 mph on the freeway.
some people crack open one or two beers in front of the tv and relax on a lazy sunday.which do you think defines the moral/ethical standing of alcohol? thats right, NEITHER. its simply a substance.