The queer hotel says: No straights or lesbos allowed!

Started by FeceMan5 pages

The queer hotel says: No straights or lesbos allowed!

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070528090003.xafs5doi&show_article=1

An Australian hotel popular with gay men has won the right to refuse entry to heterosexuals and lesbians, officials and the owner said Monday. The Peel Hotel in Melbourne won an exemption from the Equal Opportunity Act to prevent insults and abuse directed toward gays in its bars and nightclubs, owner Tom McFeely told AFP.

"The hotel predominantly markets itself towards homosexual males, towards gay men and we want to protect the integrity of the venue as well as continue to make the men feel comfortable," McFeely said.

"When large numbers of heterosexuals or even lesbians are in the hotel that changes the atmosphere and many gay men can feel uncomfortable."

The landmark decision by a civil tribunal gives the establishment -- which does not offer accommodation -- the right to refuse entry to people considered a threat to the safety and comfort of its patrons.

Helen Szoke, the chief executive of the Victoria state government's Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, said the Peel Hotel's gay clientele had experienced harassment, hostility and violence.

"(They) also have felt as though they've been like a zoo exhibit with big groups of women on hens' parties coming to the club," she said.

McFeely said his aim was not to ban all straight patrons and lesbians but to limit their numbers so gay men could freely express their sexuality.

He said he expected a backlash from other patrons, but added: "I'm not worried about it because to be frank I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think.

"My main motivation is to protect my gay male customers and I realise heterosexuals and lesbians may be upset. but I don't care about that.

"We are open at 8.00pm and we go all the way through till the morning. We have two dancefloors -- it is a nightclub environment."

McFeely said it would be easy to sort out desirable gays from undesirable straights and lesbians.

"It is particularly easy to implement with the females 'cause that is pretty obvious.

"With the heterosexual males, if they identify themselves as that at the door, or indeed we question their behaviour in the venue and if they come across as being heterosexual, then we will simply ask them to leave if the behaviour is unappropriate."

Human rights group Liberty Victoria supported the decision, vice-president Michael Pearce said.

"There are numerous places where heterosexual people can go," he said.

"I think what (the tribunal) has said is that there aren't that many places where gay people can go and meet without the risk of being harassed or vilified, and that they are entitled to have their own spaces to do that in."


*Scratches his head.*

That's so Gay

Meh. As long as hotels can also no to homosexuals, I see no problem with it.

Well, I do. But I see less of one.

Originally posted by Kinneary
Meh. As long as hotels can also no to homosexuals, I see no problem with it.

Now if that happened, every single gay group would up in arms against it. Rosie O'Donnell would be the posterchild for them, screaming her ugly head off.

Originally posted by Kinneary
Meh. As long as hotels can also no to homosexuals, I see no problem with it.

Well, I do. But I see [b]less of one. [/B]

I agree, I don't think they can though.

Also, if that is one of Fece's tricks again, I will publicly state now that neither did I read the article nor click the link to make sure that it is not a straight hotel banning homos...

In which case I would also hold the same opinion.

No, it's not a trick.

It's true...

And it's absolutely ****ing ridiculious. Discrimination is just wrong, unless it's against the majority then it's okay...

What kind of an idiotic decision is that?

If other hotels could say no to gays then it would be somewhat fine, but they can't and they won't. So this is just a lot of bullshit.

Re: The queer hotel says: No straights or lesbos allowed!

Originally posted by FeceMan
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070528090003.xafs5doi&show_article=1

*Scratches his head.*

their money is just as green as straight people. sounds like a dumb business move to me.

that's retarded. homophobes wouldn't want to stay in a gay hotel anyway and militant bigots don't need to get in legitimatley to stage an attack anyway. This is just plain segregation and some twisted misogynist and homosexist elitism.

At first I thought this said queeqs hotel......

His taverns so cool, what the hell.......hahaha

WTF? I thought Melbourne was smarter than this.

Blatant discrimination. FEDERAL LAWBREAKAGE.

If it doesn't offer accomodation, in what sense is it a hotel?

This is a private club; it can admit whoeever it likes and reject whoever it likes.

There is no equality discrimination issue here.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
If it doesn't offer accomodation, in what sense is it a hotel?

This is a private club; it can admit whoeever it likes and reject whoever it likes.

There is no equality discrimination issue here.

If it was a hotel, would different rules apply?

Denying accomodation is a little different.

But it is fairly well established that it is not the business of Government to demand who private clubs can and cannot allow in. Else things like Women's Institutes could not exist.

It is also very discriminatory to, effectively, deny one group of people their place to socialise with each other, and allow another group of people to have theirs.

Equality does not mean forced amalgamation.

Those racists . . .

Originally posted by Ushgarak
If it doesn't offer accomodation, in what sense is it a hotel?

This is a private club; it can admit whoeever it likes and reject whoever it likes.

There is no equality discrimination issue here.

Indeed. I hate it when someone beats me to the punch.

He said he expected a backlash from other patrons, but added: "I'm not worried about it because to be frank I don't really care what heterosexuals or lesbians think.

"My main motivation is to protect my gay male customers and I realise heterosexuals and lesbians may be upset. but I don't care about that."


What happens if one denies admittance to homosexuals at a heterosexual club?

If we work on the idea that it was a large group of homosexuals seeking to deliberately upset the point of the club AND we assume that the locations available for heterosexuals to go are limited in the same way then we would have an equitable situation. Seeing as there is no such thing- or any need for- a heterosexual club, that seems unlikely.

Fact of the matter is, there is absolutely no problem at all for heterosexuals in this social sense. There ARE problems for homosexuals.

*Yawn*

Originally posted by Ushgarak
If we work on the idea that it was a large group of homosexuals seeking to deliberately upset the point of the club AND we assume that the locations available for heterosexuals to go are limited in the same way then we would have an equitable situation. Seeing as there is no such thing- or any need for- a heterosexual club, that seems unlikely.

Fact of the matter is, there is absolutely no problem at all for heterosexuals in this social sense. There ARE problems for homosexuals.

It should still be alright for heterosexuals to have hetero only clubs.