The queer hotel says: No straights or lesbos allowed!

Er...

If I'm not mistaken, the law allows for specialized 'discrimination' in order to, in plain terms, 'make up for past wrongdoing'.

You can think of it in this sense:

Because homosexuals have suffered at the hands of the heterosexual majority in the past, they are entitled to certain compensatory rights.

Much like there are racial groups and gender groups which are legally allowed to discriminate between patrons, if certain gay communities feel uncomfortable in situations involving heterosexuals or lesbians, we allow them the freedom to restrict access to said elements.

Please keep in mind what 'discrimination' means. Though it has a colloquially negative context, it refers only to the process of differentiation or the making of distinction. Discrimination isn't inherently wrong, we use it every day, in all parts of our life. Think about it and you'll see what I mean...unless you're one of those people who believe having different washrooms in restaurants and not allowing 7 year olds to drive is 'discriminatory'.

Then you can shut up.

Originally posted by offtheset
Er...

If I'm not mistaken, the law allows for specialized 'discrimination' in order to, in plain terms, 'make up for past wrongdoing'.

You can think of it in this sense:

Because homosexuals have suffered at the hands of the heterosexual majority in the past, they are entitled to certain compensatory rights.

Much like there are racial groups and gender groups which are legally allowed to discriminate between patrons, if certain gay communities feel uncomfortable in situations involving heterosexuals or lesbians, we allow them the freedom to restrict access to said elements.

Please keep in mind what 'discrimination' means. Though it has a colloquially negative context, it refers only to the process of differentiation or the making of distinction. Discrimination isn't inherently wrong, we use it every day, in all parts of our life. Think about it and you'll see what I mean...unless you're one of those people who believe having different washrooms in restaurants and not allowing 7 year olds to drive is 'discriminatory'.

Then you can shut up.

Who is that directed at?

B]YouTube video

durfist [/B][/QUOTE]

Haha, Gay...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Haha, Gay...

Yet, I can't recall ever once hearing a village people song in a gay club....

Originally posted by Devil King
Yet, I can't recall ever once hearing a village people song in a gay club....

Weird me neither.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Weird me neither.

Have you ever heard them in a straight club? I have.

Originally posted by Devil King
Have you ever heard them in a straight club? I have.

No.

But my experience in both fields are similarly limited.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No.

But my experience in both fields are similarly limited.

I just think the village people are one of those baseless intrests assigned to gay people by straight people, because they're so gay.

I don't have a problem with Gay people, i believe in equal rights for everyone..

Originally posted by Faceman
I don't have a problem with Gay people, i believe in equal rights for everyone..

Oh, I wasn't accusing you of anything. I was just talking.

Originally posted by Faceman
I don't have a problem with Gay people, i believe in equal rights for everyone..

Well good, because the logical extension of equal rights is exactly what has happened here.

If you are silly enough to think homogoneity of laws = equality for everyone, then you are forever going to think that there is some sort of unfair agenda here. But that would just be the bias in you.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Who is that directed at?

Anyone who's interested ^_^;;

Originally posted by Ushgarak
That is an exceptionally ignorant comment that borders on the homophobic, to try and even vaguely pretend there is quity in social situation between heteosexuals and homosexuals.

How absurd.

Again, Lil- you are not comparing equal situations. These comparisons are not fair.

Why are they not fair? Homosexuals are not different to heterosexuals.
If one can have exclusively homosexual club, then there should be a strictly heterosexual club.

Even if there was demand for heterosexual clubs only, noone dare say it, as that would imply they are homophobes, and the big question is posted as to ''why would someone want strictly heterosexual club - they MUST be homophobic, otherwise they wouldn't mind homosexuals''.

Homophobes would not go into a homosexual clubs anyway, so what's the problem?

Originally posted by offtheset
Much like there are racial groups and gender groups which are legally allowed to discriminate between patrons, if certain gay communities feel uncomfortable in situations involving heterosexuals or lesbians, we allow them the freedom to restrict access to said elements.

Right. Because lesbians are heterosexual and all, and are making other homosexuals uncomfortable.

Its not only a display of discrimination (heterophobia), but it is also incredibly misogynist.
Which is extremely ironic.

I'm not homosexual, but lesbians make me uncomfortable.

Doing all that stuff.

Together.

They make me "uncomfortable" too.

Originally posted by Robtard
They make me "uncomfortable" too.

I cant bring myself to look at that

disgusting

i need to go wash up. be back in a few

Originally posted by Robtard
They make me "uncomfortable" too.

Very sick indeed.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Well good, because the logical extension of equal rights is exactly what has happened here.

If you are silly enough to think homogoneity of laws = equality for everyone, then you are forever going to think that there is some sort of unfair agenda here. But that would just be the bias in you.

Actually heteros not being allowed straight only clubs is not equal.

Not saying it is wrong to not let them have it....but it certainly is not equal....English language-y ... we can at least agree on that, right?