Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Nah, I was calling you jealous. Maybe, because I can get my point across, without blue faces to represent my emotion. Or maybe, because I can get it across without having my caps lock light on.
EVERYTIME I SEE YOUR NAME ON MY THREAD, I WON'T READ IT, AND I'LL JUST THINK YOU ARE ACTING ON YOUR JEALOUSY...........
IGNORED (DON'T WORRY, IT TAKES SOME AWHILE TO FIGURE THIS OUT)
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
EVERYTIME I SEE YOUR NAME ON MY THREAD, I WON'T READ IT, AND I'LL JUST THINK YOU ARE ACTING ON YOUR JEALOUSY...........IGNORED (DON'T WORRY, IT TAKES SOME AWHILE TO FIGURE THIS OUT)
Yeah, especially you. Given the fact you've said it a good four times already.
Oh, yeah, since when was this your thread?
i didnt read all this because after a while it just sounded like people trying to act smart lmao
but 70 and below, or maybe its 75 and below, either way
its supposed to be mentally challenged, so if it says 70 is average im gonna assume this was an online quiz, meaning it smost likely not a r eal one, not official or anything, never trust things u see online, its often a lie and since 130 and bove is supposedly supposed to be smart-genius range
idk it sounds wrong to me, also alot of stuff may be guessed on/done by will in situations like that, so the results are often not fully correct
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Maybe it's because you need to work on your own. Hint: 'I CAN'T READ THIS GUYS ENGLISH'.
DIDN'T READ.
DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS GUYS ENGLISH AND HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND MINE........
I TOLD HIM HE WAS IGNORED, YET AGGRESSIVELY POSTS WITH MY QUOTES...AND ONCE I SEE HIS NAME, I KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE STUPID AND ADDS NO VALUE TO ANYBODY BUT HIS EGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
JEALOUSY............
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
DIDN'T READ.DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS GUYS ENGLISH AND HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND MINE........
I TOLD HIM HE WAS IGNORED, YET AGGRESSIVELY POSTS WITH MY QUOTES...AND ONCE I SEE HIS NAME, I KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE STUPID AND ADDS NO VALUE TO ANYBODY BUT HIS EGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
JEALOUSY............
Well, you're not ignoring me are you? You're trying to have the last word, even if the last word is 'I'm ignoring this guy'. Idiot.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
DIDN'T READ.DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS GUYS ENGLISH AND HE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND MINE........
I TOLD HIM HE WAS IGNORED, YET AGGRESSIVELY POSTS WITH MY QUOTES...AND ONCE I SEE HIS NAME, I KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE STUPID AND ADDS NO VALUE TO ANYBODY BUT HIS EGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
JEALOUSY............
Perhaps if you just put him on your ignore list instead of saying you are ignoring him you wouldn't look like a f*****g clown shoe, then again maybe not. Also seeing as we invented the language, maybe you should try harder.
out of all the GOOD that is written, with zero personal attacks initiated by me, I am somehow annoying....well, i wasn't attacked until I gave the definition to the word niger that pissed someone off, then it was a matter of ganging up on me, which is fine, as that shows inferiority, when you have to use different people to attacke ONE person, that shows something right there.
i do not like blacks who act this way, attacking someone just b/c they give a definition they disagree with, the way they handled it was UNCIVILIZED, you can disagree without going on an attack, but i won't change my views on the word niger, mainly b/c i was attacked and still am b/c of MY VIEWS.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarinai do not like blacks who act this way, attacking someone just b/c they give a definition they disagree with, the way they handled it was UNCIVILIZED, you can disagree without going on an attack, but i won't change my views on the word niger, mainly b/c i was attacked and still am b/c of MY VIEWS.
Actually you do not like blacks regardless of how they act because even the "civilized" have some "hidden intention."
I am the lieutenant of some secret black organization who goes to online forums and convinces the people of white guilt and black privilege! Listen to me! Remember what your ancestors did to us! 😆
**** outta here. 😮💨
I.Q testing has a, not so proud histoy. even uptil NOW, no1 has been able to satisfactorily DEFINE, intelligence. so how come, i.q testing has recieved the amount of respect that it has now?????. im taking psychology as a subject, and its well known that i.q tests are a novel alternative severely lacking ecological validity, of real life situations in which one's ability to solve the problem MIGHT be seen as a PART/COMPONENT of intelligence, needless to say, they shudnt have anywhere near the level of validity that they seem to garner in people's minds. i mean really, how can u even design tests to measure sumthing that cant be defined. {also the definitions of fluid intelligence etc given here are quite contreversial in psychology, as it doesnt indicate that the basic ability required for either is the SAME in similiar processes, from most tests, it can be seen that fluid intelligence questions, depending on the question, require many completely different parts of the brain to fuction and completely different synaptic pathways/processing to reach an answer fo the question. meaning, two FLUIDITY QUESTIONS might be representing no more uniformity in the required ability than two completely different TYPES of questions. i.e one fluid and another one the opposite}
Originally posted by leonheartmmWow, you study Psychology?
I.Q testing has a, not so proud histoy. even uptil NOW, no1 has been able to satisfactorily DEFINE, intelligence. so how come, i.q testing has recieved the amount of respect that it has now?????. im taking psychology as a subject, and its well known that i.q tests are a novel alternative severely lacking ecological validity, of real life situations in which one's ability to solve the problem MIGHT be seen as a PART/COMPONENT of intelligence, needless to say, they shudnt have anywhere near the level of validity that they seem to garner in people's minds. i mean really, how can u even design tests to measure sumthing that cant be defined. {also the definitions of fluid intelligence etc given here are quite contreversial in psychology, as it doesnt indicate that the basic ability required for either is the SAME in similiar processes, from most tests, it can be seen that fluid intelligence questions, depending on the question, require many completely different parts of the brain to fuction and completely different synaptic pathways/processing to reach an answer fo the question. meaning, two FLUIDITY QUESTIONS might be representing no more uniformity in the required ability than two completely different TYPES of questions. i.e one fluid and another one the opposite}
Wow...you study anything?
Or is it just that you are by coincidence always a specialist on the topic that you discuss
"Terrorism? I met Bin Laden"
"IQ tests? Study Psychology"
"Religion? I was a pastor once"
"Abortion? Medicine as well as ethics was my first major"
"The Civil War? I was Lincoln once."
Originally posted by Bardock42
Wow, you study Psychology?Wow...you study anything?
Or is it just that you are by coincidence always a specialist on the topic that you discuss
"Terrorism? I met Bin Laden"
"IQ tests? Study Psychology"
"Religion? I was a pastor once"
"Abortion? Medicine as well as ethics was my first major"
"The Civil War? I was Lincoln once."
LMAO, is sum1 a little bitter from before?
terrorism: i live in pakistan, been brought up in an islamic extreme enviornement, have parents/reletives in places where they know quite well, people of influence. understand the midset because i had for most of my life, the same mindset as an extremist muslim. know about the place because due to certain events, ive been to some known hotspots and live next door to the most active breeding ground. met osama as a fluke, was too young, doesnt mean much of anything, i hate him.
I.Q. tests: study psychology in A level{where the IQ theme is explored}. have an interest in psychology myself so read lotsa literature, online stuff, books etc. and it does help that ipersonally love philosophy too so implications and viewpoint come into display there{avid reader of freud, jung, piaget and other clasical psychological appproaches}
RELEGION: for all the points described in terrorism, and the fact that im an agnostic/atheist and am so because of reason, and have read multiple books, arguments to justify those reasons, furyther, living in this country, can comment on many of its chortcomings that most people wudnt know about. i also READ BOOKS{i.e. dont have it as a formal subject at all but read at leasure} by relegionus and non relegion authors on comparitive relegions.
ABORTION: take basic and human biology in my A levels, plus the fact that you learn about the physical/chemical components of a conciounce in psychology, and thus form my oppinion backed up by my thoughts on philosophical implications on when a "soul" or conciounce is physically present or absent, and on that, base my perspective of abortion
PHILOSOPHY: addicted to bertrand russel, john dewey, noam chomsky, somewhat to richard dawkins. furthermore, lotsa interets in physics{take it as a cubject and otherwise read informally about it} and mathematics{which is alos one of my subject and interests, althugh im not actually very good at calculating}. also read aristotle/neitsche/hegel/marx and most of the other classical idiots. all this really gives me a back bone on how to comment on the other things u mentioned.
and i watch the news{albeit more channels and views than most} just like every 1 else
THE CIVIL WAR: i dont ever remember commenting on it. dont know much about it at all.
HAPPY?! really any1 can do it, and many people do, the things i do. what the heck does it matter to you. i know i dont have a very special brain and im no genius, so i sumtimes try to make up for it by learning more, and after all, there isnt much substitute for effort and slow reading, when compared to the vastly inconsistant thing called unusual intelligence. anyway, what exactly was the point ur trying to make???? i wudnt comment on things{specially wudnt say that my oppinion was always more right or knowledgeble than others} i dont know about, ask me about complex geology or the cocionce of plants or meteorology or a whole BUCNH of stufff and i wud only really counter after reading the basics about the specific situation, bloody hell i dont claim to know things by default.