galactus and all his creations vs all new gods

Originally posted by UniOmni
This has already been debunked.

The Time stream collapsed because Darkseid is so important, not because he's so powerful.

Get it straight.

Without someone there to take his place, the universe will always unravel.
It's not his power, it's his role.

And i made the remark to you, merely because you said people who don't take the intentions of Kirby about his creations seriously are biased against the New Gods.

Which is a weak stance anyway you cut it.

BS. I proved you wrong on this last time, not the other way around.

Darkseid smashed his way into the Source.
http://img353.imageshack.us/my.php?image=f9143934jpgorig1oz.jpg

And yes, it was Darkseid's power that was responsible for the collapse.
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29066pu.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29079yu.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29087ta.jpg

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
BS. I proved [b]you wrong on this last time, not the other way around.

Darkseid smashed his way into the Source.
http://img353.imageshack.us/my.php?image=f9143934jpgorig1oz.jpg

And yes, it was Darkseid's power that was responsible for the collapse.
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29066pu.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29079yu.jpg
http://img394.imageshack.us/my.php?image=legion29087ta.jpg [/B]

Originally posted by UniOmni
Quanchi11..................wtf man?!

You give the NG Black Racer, and access to their tech, but won't allow Galactus access to his greatest weapon?

Galactus and heralds lose, unless you take the BR out of the contest, and allow Galactus to be fed and Tyrant to be at full power.

They can win a few there, but without the UN, the Gods get all their various shonenjump type boxes to one up the last.

Mods, close this thread

Originally posted by starking
What the are you talking about? Orion and Darkseid, have destroyed a bunch of planets, in one of their fights. It's obvious your thinking of something else, because if weren't, then you would've known for sure, that it WASN'T symbolic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
i have sen them clash and no planets were destroyed. its symbollic. if im wrong provide me the comic and page number. i dont have time to look up respect threads on other sites either.

Originally posted by starking
Do you even no what symbolic means? I'm guessing your completely clueless, about the fight I'm talking about. When Orion and Darkseid clashed in their true forms, they DESTROYED a bunch of planets. I forgot where I saw it, but I'm not lying, when say the fight was for real.

Originally posted by quanchi112
i ask for proof and none is provided for me. there is nothing else to say. without proof i still say symbollic beczuz i have seen them fight and nothing extraordinary happens.

Psychology
"The interpretation of abstract symbols has had an important role in religion and psychoanalysis. As envisioned by Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, symbols are not the creations of mind, but rather are distinct capacities within the mind to hold a distinct piece of information. In the mind, the symbol can find free association with any number of other symbols, can be organized in any number of ways, and can hold the connected meanings between symbols as symbols in themselves. Jung and Freud diverged on the issue of common cognitive symbol systems and whether they could exist only within the individual mind or among other minds; whether any cognitive symbolism was defined by innate symbolism or by the influence of the environment around them."

That was just to show you, the difinition of symbolism. I have a question for you. Have you seen the time, Orion and Darkseid clashed in their giant forms? If you haven't, then your most likely, thinking of one of their other fights(and I would hardly call them fights, Ds has wtfpwned Orion several times, if not always).

Originally posted by starking
Psychology
"The interpretation of abstract symbols has had an important role in religion and psychoanalysis. As envisioned by Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung, symbols are not the creations of mind, but rather are distinct capacities within the mind to hold a distinct piece of information. In the mind, the symbol can find free association with any number of other symbols, can be organized in any number of ways, and can hold the connected meanings between symbols as symbols in themselves. Jung and Freud diverged on the issue of common cognitive symbol systems and whether they could exist only within the individual mind or among other minds; whether any cognitive symbolism was defined by innate symbolism or by the influence of the environment around them."

That was just to show you, the difinition of symbolism. I have a question for you. Have you seen the time, Orion and Darkseid clashed in their giant forms? If you haven't, then your most likely, thinking of one of their other fights(and I would hardly call them fights, Ds has wtfpwned Orion several times, if not always).

Originally posted by quanchi112
any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something; "if you have any proof for what you say, now is the time to produce it. this is the definition of proof. wheres ur proof. i give proof. i dont ktake anyones word fo anything. i actaully believed jeph loeb was only writer to script darkie losing till i decided one day to look it up. so from now on if u cant proof something like this. i dont believe you. its symbollic and i havent seen darkseid tear planets apart on panel.

Originally posted by starking
😆 😆
Fine then, you don't have to believe me, but it DID happen in a canon source. You never showed me any PROOF that Thanos defeated the Maker, but I didn't completely throw it out the window, because I didn't see it. I believe they destroyed planets, in the same story where Darkseid rips Orion in half. I can't find the picture, nor can I post them, so you can feel free, to not believe me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
but when i find proof i find a comic an issue number and usually apage. u have no lcue what comic what page u just say i read soemthing likt that. thats the difference i prove things i dont say trust me guys i read it.

Originally posted by starking
Uhhn not really, the only time you've came close to proving something, was when you told Nvr, about Ds caring for Apokolips, in Hunter/Prey. Even then, you were wrong.

You said

"alright here it is. it seems even i know more about ur darkseid that even u do. page 33 of hunter and prey storyline. these wroms flee from the wrath of the creature. but they are my worms, desaad and must be protected. so says darkseid. as i stated earlier he has no problem killing his own soldeirs but if someone else does he gets pissed. i have proved u wrong again. i seem to know more about the character of darkseid that u do even."

Then I reply with

"The guy who wrote Hunter/Prey, said Darkseid shouldn't be a powerful cosmic villain. The only person Ds cares about, is his son."

Tell me what you proved? Btw, you never proved ANYTHING, the only reason Ds was afraid, was because of the father son clause.

Originally posted by starking
You said

"alright here it is. it seems even i know more about ur darkseid that even u do. page 33 of hunter and prey storyline. these wroms flee from the wrath of the creature. but they are my worms, desaad and must be protected. so says darkseid. as i stated earlier he has no problem killing his own soldeirs but if someone else does he gets pissed. i have proved u wrong again. i seem to know more about the character of darkseid that u do even."

Then I reply with

"The guy who wrote Hunter/Prey, said Darkseid shouldn't be a powerful cosmic villain. The only person Ds cares about, is his son."

Tell me what you proved? Btw, you never proved ANYTHING, the only reason Ds was afraid, was because of the father son clause.

Originally posted by starking
You said

"alright here it is. it seems even i know more about ur darkseid that even u do. page 33 of hunter and prey storyline. these wroms flee from the wrath of the creature. but they are my worms, desaad and must be protected. so says darkseid. as i stated earlier he has no problem killing his own soldeirs but if someone else does he gets pissed. i have proved u wrong again. i seem to know more about the character of darkseid that u do even."

Then I reply with

"The guy who wrote Hunter/Prey, said Darkseid shouldn't be a powerful cosmic villain. The only person Ds cares about, is his son."

Tell me what you proved? Btw, you never proved ANYTHING, the only reason Ds was afraid, was because of the father son clause.

Originally posted by quanchi112
i proved to nver he cares about other people than himself. nver said he cared for no one else. i said his sons also look back. why would since u agreed with me would i diagree with atht statement. i proved to nevr although darkseid cares for himself more than anyone else he does care for toher beings in his own way. u were on my side. u disagreed with nver with me how did it feel.

Originally posted by quanchi112
thr afther clause thing doesnt make u afraid, orion isnt afriad of his father and has tried to kill him before. darkseid just wussed out.

Originally posted by starking
Too bad that shit came out of Hunter/Prey 😆

is hunter prey canon? answer me that.

Originally posted by quanchi112
is hunter prey canon? answer me that.