Pakistan says Rushdie knighthood justifies suicide bombings

Started by lil bitchiness4 pages

Pakistan says Rushdie knighthood justifies suicide bombings

Salman Rushdie, as you might be familiar is the author of Satanic Verses

He has recently been granted knighthood by the Queen of England, which sparked the controversy, in Iran and Pakistan, mostly.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article1948375.ece

Britain's decision to award Salman Rushdie a knighthood set off a storm of protest in the Islamic world today, with a Pakistani government minister giving warning that it could provide justification for suicide bomb attacks.

Rushdie was awarded the title in the Queen's Birthday Honours on Saturday. He has lived under police protection since the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran pronounced a fatwa (death sentence) on him over alleged blasphemies against Islam in his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses.

Today, Pakistan's religious affairs minister suggested that the knighthood was so grave an offence that any Muslim anywhere in the world would be justified in taking violent action.

"If somebody has to attack by strapping bombs to his body to protect the honour of the Prophet then it is justified," Mr ul-Haq told the National Assembly.

For nine years Salman Rushdie lived as a virtual prisoner, changing addresses constantly, and protected around the clock by British security at an estimated cost of £10 million

The minister, the son of Zia ul-Haq, the military dictator who died in a plane crash in 1988, later retracted his statement in parliament, then told the AFP news agency that he meant to say that knighting Rushdie would foster extremism.

"If someone blows himself up he will consider himself justified. How can we fight terrorism when those who commit blasphemy are rewarded by the West?" he said.

He said Pakistan should sever diplomatic ties with Britain if it did not withdraw the award, adding:"We demand an apology by the British government. Their action has hurt the sentiments of 1.5 billion Muslims...

"If Muslims do not unite, the situation will get worse and Salman Rushdie may get a seat in the British parliament."

Iran has also condemned Rushdie's knighthood, with hardliners issuing calls for his murder today. Mehdi Kuchakzadeh, a Tehran MP, declared: “It would be a hollow dream for the Queen of England to think that with such an action she could revive one of her mercenaries to oppose Islam... Rushdie died the moment the late Imam (Ayatollah Khomeini) issued the fatwa.”

Backed by the Government, the Pakistan parliament today voted unanimously in favour of a resolution calling on Britain to withdraw the proferred knighthood because it is an insult to "the sentiments of Muslims across the world" and created religious hatred.

Sher Afgan Khan Niazi, the Minister for Parliamentary Affairs who proposed the resolution, called Rushdie a blasphemer. "Every religion should be respected," he told the National Assembly, "I demand the British government immediately withdraw the title as it is creating religious hatred."

Tasnim Aslam, the Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, said that Islamabad would protest to London. "We deplore the decision of the British government to knight him. This we feel is insensitive and we would convey our sentiments to the British government."

Khwaja Asif, an Opposition parliamentarian, warned however that the resolution exposed a contradiction in the Government’s policy as an ally of Britain in the international war on terrorism.

In the Pakistani city of Multan, about 100 Muslim students burnt effigies of the Queen and Rushdie and shouted: "Kill him, kill him".

Rushdie went into hiding and copies of The Satanic Verses were publicly burned on the streets of Bradford after Ayatollah Khomeini issued his fatwa, ordering Muslims to kill him.

Eighteen years ago when Scotland Yard first gave Salman Rushdie police protection senior officers accepted that the operation could take years and cost millions but there was a determination that it had to be done. Senior officers felt that he could not be allowed to become a victim of extremism and Special Branch officers began their guard on him.

The first team were all volunteers because of the risk from a suicide attack. Rushdie now spends much of his time in the United States but the Yard's protection unit will still place an armed team round him when he comes to Britain. The total cost to date has been put at up to £10 million - some of it paid by Rushdie himself.

The comparatively moderate Iranian Government of Mohammad Khatami softened the country's official stance, announcing in 1998, on re-establishing diplomatic relations with Britain, that it did not support the religious edict but was unable revoke it. The country's hardliners have however not swerved in their support for the death sentence.

Yesterday, Mohammad Ali Hosseini , an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, said that Rushdie was "one of the most hated figures" in the Islamic world.

"Honouring and commending an apostate and hated figure will definitely put the British officials (in a position) of confrontation with Islamic societies," Hosseini said.

"This act shows that insulting Islamic sacred (values) is not accidental. It is planned, organised, guided and supported by some Western countries."

The angry reaction in the Muslim world means that now a new threat assessment will have to be written for Rushdie, say sources at Scotland Yard. He will be given fresh advice on the precautions he takes abroad, and the unit around him in Britain may have to be beefed up.

The Satanic Verses’ treatment of the life of Muhammad was seen as blasphemous by many Muslims. Parts that caused particular offence include a suggestion that Islam was founded by the Prophet after experiencing hallucinations caused by smoking hashish.

The British High Commission in Islamabad defended the decision to honour Rushdie, one of the most prominent novelists of the late 20th century whose 13 books have won numerous awards, including the Booker Prize for Midnight’s Children in 1981.

Aidan Liddle, a spokesman from the British High Commission in Islamabad said: "Sir Salman’s honour is richly deserved and the reasons for it are self-explanatory."

Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, the Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain, today added his voice to the chorus of disapproval of the knighthood.

"Salman Rushdie earned notoriety amongst Muslims for the highly insulting and blasphemous manner in which he portrayed early Islamic figures," he said.

"The granting of a knighthood to him can only do harm to the image of our country in the eyes of hundreds of millions of Muslims across the world. Many will interpret the knighthood as a final contemptuous parting gift from Tony Blair to the Muslim world."

Thoughts?

Re: Pakistan says Rushdie knighthood justifies suicide bombings

"...justifies suicide bombings" Not sure that fit's in with the "Islam is a religion of peace" mantra. Let's face it, did they need "justification" in previous S-B's? This is just another excuse, guy wrote a ****ing book 20 years ago, nothing more.

Bumping this thread Lil B, silly how threads of some sustenance get overlooked...

P.S. Show me your butt-hole.

I saw this on the news the other day, but they were very brief about the details.

To be honest, I think the threats made are utterly ridiculous. I don't believe that all people of Islamic faith, are by any means offended by this knighthood. It could well be a carefully placed spin on the facts by extremist groups. It also seems to carefully coincide in its relation to the Alan Johnston situation.

Stupid thing for the Minister to say- another nail in the coffin of how the world views Islam.

I am faintly surprised that Knighthoods still carry such currency outside of the UK for anyone to care about it, actually. Which is kinda nice I suppose.

I've always thought it'd be great if we ran out of soldiers and celebrity knights had to fight in a war. Completely unfeasible of course, but it would be funny.

What qualifies people for Knighthood status? Though A. Hopkins is a great actor and E. John is a great musician, I fail to see what either of them did for crown and country. Don't Knights defend and uphold the law of the land?

To be honest, I'm that not queen and country myself; that I have no idea. I think it must just be doing a great service in some way, a lot of people get a knighthood for charity work.

I agree with Ush, its kinda nice that knighthood from UK is still looked upon as important to that extent.

Although I doubt its about the status, its more about spite and the fact that UK honored someone who criticized Islam.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
I agree with Ush, its kinda nice that knighthood from UK is still looked upon as important to that extent.

Although I doubt its about the status, its more about spite and the fact that UK honored someone who criticized Islam.


Precisely, it's not the knighthood, it's just the fact that the UK are honouring someone for doing something that they didn't agree with.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Precisely, it's not the knighthood, it's just the fact that the UK are honouring someone for doing something that they didn't agree with.

Which sucks for them, and if some idiots decide to blow themselves up to kill this knight then that is a far bigger problem, but something that you just have to risk.

It is absolutely insane that country's like this think that threats like that could prevent us from doing what we want. At least it should be insane.

To be honest, I'm that not queen and country myself; that I have no idea. I think it must just be doing a great service in some way, a lot of people get a knighthood for charity work.

In this country you can get knighted if you do some great things for this country. Meaning pretty much every good public entertainer, national or international medal winning athlete and some of the greatest politicians we have had end up with a medal.

I'd imagine it be much the same in the UK... Making the title pretty worthless if you ask me, way to many people have the title.

No point in saying anything. You know the score.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Precisely, it's not the knighthood, it's just the fact that the UK are honouring someone for doing something that they didn't agree with.

But it IS the Knnighthood. Rushdie has received plenty of awards over time, but it's only when it is a Knighthood that suddenly all this happens.

It is resented for him to have a 'Sir' in front of his name, because that is, apparently, a title that carries weight globally.

It's very interesting, that such ancient institutions still have that evocative power.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Although I doubt its about the status, its more about spite and the fact that UK honored someone who criticized Islam.

Rushdie has lived with a deathmark on his head for 20 years. (despite the fact that no one has tried to do anything in a really long time) He deserves to be a "Sir". He saw the bullshit in Islam, and called them on it.

The Satanic verses isn´t that bad really, the lunatic clerics probably havn´t even read it. But any excuse to jump on the "holy war" train and they are first at the ticket office.

they can´t have much confidence in thier religion if the slightest comment against it causes such calamity.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
But it IS the Knnighthood. Rushdie has received plenty of awards over time, but it's only when it is a Knighthood that suddenly all this happens.

It is resented for him to have a 'Sir' in front of his name, because that is, apparently, a title that carries weight globally.

It's very interesting, that such ancient institutions still have that evocative power.


It's because the knighthood is probably the highest honour a person can get in this country. It's got nothing to do with the traditions of the honour or what it means, it's just the principle.

Perhaps it was a... strategic move on Britain's part. Perhaps they wanted the extremists to react like that, trick them into giving themselves a bad impression. Well, baddER anyways.

Shame they didnt order a fatwa on Ian Botham

Originally posted by §P0oONY
It's because the knighthood is probably the highest honour a person can get in this country. It's got nothing to do with the traditions of the honour or what it means, it's just the principle.

That depends on the Knihthood, bit frankly, you don't ever see this kind of fuss made on such a globally different level about honours levelled by other countries.

Pakistan is a Commonwealth country so there might be a link there; Iran is more surprising. But the fact of the matter is that the world still pays attention to someone being made a Knight.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
That depends on the Knihthood, bit frankly, you don't ever see this kind of fuss made on such a globally different level about honours levelled by other countries.

Pakistan is a Commonwealth country so there might be a link there; Iran is more surprising. But the fact of the matter is that the world still pays attention to someone being made a Knight.


It's not just anyone being made a knight though, it's a man that has been in hiding due to threats by extremists across the globe.

The out cry may very well have been influenced by Pakistan's Commonwealth status, it is basically their queen giving an honour to a man they despise.