boriquaking55
Pak is a straight fool
Thoughts on the new Thor series.....
Hey guys, I've been reading through the new Thor series and I have really enjoyed I so far. I love the artwork, think the writing is excellent, and I'm enjoying the new characterization of Thor. However, there is one major thing about the book that just aren't sitting well with me that I thought I'd discuss.
I really, and I mean really, dislike the way the rebuilding of Asgard is being handled. It feels way too contrived to me. Why on earth would Thor, needing to rebuild Asgard, choose a location in Oklahoma, or anywhere in the United States, to rebuild? This makes no sense whatsoever. Why did he not choose a more practical domain, perhaps something obvious like the mountainous region of Scandanavia, or above the oceans, to do this.
To me it seems like an all-too obvious attempt to tie it in to the events of Civil War & registration, and to set up a "cool" fight with Iron Man, and it makes no sense to me. It didn't seem in character for Thor to just choose a location in the American midwest to me. Sure he was there at the time, but that's not justification It just wasn't necessary. Iron Man and Thor would have come to blows without that.
Which brings me to my other point - why did the writers feel it was necessary to show Thor rebuilding Asgard here on earth in the first place? This utterly kills the mystery and fantastical wonder that is supposed to be Asgard itself. It's not supposed to be a place mere mortals can just see hovering above their land. I think it's an unnecessary retcon and almost feels insulting. I hope that Marvel doesn't plan on keeping things that way. I much prefer the way the whole thing was handled in the Ultimate universe, keeping Asgard mysterious and vague. Don't show Asgard immediately, and keep it mostly off-panel if you're going to do it.
I just thought I'd vent for a moment, it's just really bugging me. Anyone else feel this way?